Abstract
Previous studies have shown that the voluntary allocation of attention to a location in space can influence accuracy in two ways. First, additional processing resources can be allocated to the attended location, leading to an improvement in perceptual quality for objects presented at that location. Second, decision processes can be restricted to information arising from the attended location, which improves accuracy without influencing the perceptual representation. The present study examined the operation of these two attentional mechanisms when nonpredictive peripheral cues were used to capture attention automatically. Experiment 1 showed that, like predictive cues, nonpredictive cues influence accuracy by summoning perceptual resources and also by influencing decision processes. However, both the cues and the targets in this experiment were defined by luminance increments, making it possible that the cuing effects were mediated by a task-controlled attentional set rather than being fully automatic. Experiments 2 and 3 examined this possibility by using luminance-defined cues and color-defined targets; evidence was again obtained for both perceptual-level and decision-level attention effects. The capture of attention by a nonpredictive peripheral cue thus appears to influence both perceptual resource allocation and postperceptual decision processes.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cheal, M., &Gregory, M. (1997). Evidence of limited capacity and noise reduction with single-element displays in the location-cuing paradigm.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,23, 51–71.
Cheal, M. L., &Lyon, D. R. (1991). Central and peripheral precuing of forced-choice discrimination.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,43A, 859–880.
Cohen, A., &Ivry, R. B. (1989). Illusory conjunctions inside and outside the focus of attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 650–663.
Cohen, A., &Ivry, R. B. (1991). Density effects in conjunction search: Evidence for a coarse location mechanism of feature integration.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,17, 891–901.
Egeth, H. E., &Yantis, S. (1997). Visual attention: Control, representation, and time course.Annual Review of Psychology,48, 269–297.
Eriksen, C. W., &Hoffman, J. E. (1974). Selective attention: Noise suppression or signal enhancement?Bulletin of the Psvchonomic Society,4, 587–589.
Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., &Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 1030–1044.
Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., &Johnston, J. C. (1993). Contingent attentional capture: A reply to Yantis (1993).Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,19, 682–685.
Giesbrecht, B. L., &Di Lollo, V. (1998). Beyond the attentional blink: Visual masking by object substitution.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 1454–1466.
Handy, T. C., Kingstone, A., & Mangun, G. R. (in press). Spatial distribution of visual attention: Perceptual sensitivity and response latency.Perception & Psychophysics.
Hawkins, H. L., Hillyard, S. A., Luck, S. J., Mouloua, M., Down-Ing, C. J., &Woodward, D. P. (1990). Visual attention modulates signal detectability.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 802–811.
Hawkins, H. L., Shafto, M. G., &Richardson, K. (1988). Effects of target luminance and cue validity on the latency of visual detection.Perception & Psychophysics,44, 484–492.
Henderson, J. M. (1996). Spatial precues affect target discrimination in the absence of visual noise.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,22, 780–787.
Henderson, J. M., &Macquistan, A. D. (1993). The spatial distribution of attention following an exogenous cue.Perception & Psychophysics,53, 221–230.
Hillstrom, A. P., &Yantis, S. (1994). Visual motion and attentional capture.Perception & Psychophysics,55, 399–411.
Jonides, J. (1981). Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind’s eye’s movement. In J. [B.] Long & A. [D.] Baddeley (Eds.),Attention and performance IX (pp. 187–203). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kahneman, D. (1973).Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Lappin, J. S., &Uttal, W. R. (1976). Does prior knowledge facilitate the detection of visual targets in random noise?Perception & Psychophysics,20, 367–374.
Luck, S. J. (1995). Multiple mechanisms of visual-spatial attention: Recent evidence from human electrophysiology.Behavioural Brain Research,71, 113–123.
Luck, S. J., Hillyard, S. A., Mouloua, M., &Hawkins, H. L. (1996). Mechanisms of visual-spatial attention: Resource allocation or uncertainty reduction?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,22, 725–737.
Luck, S. J., Hillyard, S. A., Mouloua, M., Woldorff, M. G., Clark, V. P., &Hawkins, H. L. (1994). Effects of spatial cuing on luminance detectability: Psychophysical and electrophysiological evidence for early selection.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 887–904.
Palmer, J., Ames, C. T., &Lindsey, D. T. (1993). Measuring the effect of attention on simple visual search.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,19, 108–130.
Posner, M. I., &Cohen, Y (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.),Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 531 -556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Reinitz, M. T. (1990). Effects of spatially directed attention on visual encoding.Perception & Psychophysics,47, 497–505.
Shapiro, K. L., &Raymond, J. E. (1994). Temporal allocation of visual attention: Inhibition or interference. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.),Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 151–188). San Diego: Academic Press.
Shaw, M. L. (1984). Division of attention among spatial locations: A fundamental difference between detection of letters and detection of luminance increments. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.),Attention and performance X (pp. 109–121). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Shiu, L., &Pashler, H. (1994). Negligible effect of spatial precuing on identification of single digits.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 1037–1054.
Sperling, G. (1960). The information available in brief visual presentations.Psychological Monographs,74.
Sperling, G., &Dosher, B. A. (1986). Strategy and optimization in human information processing. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.),Handbook of perception and human performance (pp. 2–65). New York: Wiley.
Tassinari, G., Aglioti, S., Chelazzi, L., Peru, A., &Berlucchi, G. (1994). Do peripheral non-informative cues induce early facilitation of target detection?Vision Research,34, 179–189.
Yantis, S. (1993). Stimulus-driven attentional capture and attentional control settings.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Per-ception & Performance,19, 676–681.
Yantis, S., &Hillstrom, A. P. (1994). Stimulus-driven attentional capture: Evidence from equiluminant visual objects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 95–107.
Yantis, S., &Jonides, J. (1990). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Voluntary versus automatic allocation.Journal of Experi-mental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 121–134.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This study was supported by Grant 95-38 from the McDonnell-Pew Program in Cognitive Neuroscience and by a Grant-in-Aid of Research from the National Academy of Sciences, through Sigma Xi, the Scientific Research Society.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Luck, S.J., Thomas, S.J. What variety of attention is automatically captured by peripheral cues?. Perception & Psychophysics 61, 1424–1435 (1999). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206191
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206191