Abstract
In previous studies, modalities with a higher Weber fraction have tended to have a lower power-function exponent. Within a modality, however, the Weber fraction and power-function exponent for individual subjects were unrelated, and the present study largely confirms this finding for the numerosity dimension. More important than discriminability in the judgment of numerosity were cognitive factors. A single feedback trial considerably reduced intersubject variability on the magnitude-estimation exponent, although it failed to eliminate individual differences completely (precue and postcue exponents correlated signigicantly, r=+.50). Intrasubject variability, by contrast, seemingly did not involve the underlying exponent. As in previous studies, numerosity generally was underestimated and the power-function exponent was 1.08 for magnitude production and .80 for precue magnitude estimation. Contrary to previous results, however, males and females did not differ in exponent, perhaps because the present procedure allowed self-selection of individuals more interested in numerosity tasks.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Auerbach, C. (1971). Interdependence of Stevens’ exponents and discriminability measures.Psychological Review,78, 556.
Baird, J. C. (1970). A cognitive theory of psychophysics: II. Fechnei’s law and Stevens’ law.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,11, 89–102.
Baird, J. C., Romer, D., &Stein, T. (1970). Test of a cognitive theory of psychophysics: Size discrimination.Perceptual & Motor Skills,30, 495–501.
Burgess, A., &Barlow, H. B. (1983). The precision of numerosity discrimination in arrays of random dots.Vision Research,23, 811–820.
Eisler, H. (1963). Magnitude scales, category scales, and Fechnerian integration.Psychological Review,70, 243–253.
Graf, V., Baird, J. C., &Glesman, G. (1974). An empirical test of two psychophysical models.Acta Psychologica,38, 59–72.
Heinemann, E. G. (1978). Discriminability and ratio scaling. In J. C. Armington, J. Krauskopf, & B. R. Wooten (Eds.),Visual psychophysics and physiology: A volume dedicated to Lomn Riggs pp. 157–166). New York: Academic Press.
Indow, T., &Ida, M. (1977). Scaling of dot numerosity.Perception & Psychophysics,22, 265–276.
Kaufman, E. L., Lord, M. W., Reese, T. W., &Volkmann, J. (1949). The discrimination of visual number.American Journal of Psychology,62,498–525.
Krueger, L. E. (1972). Perceived numerosity.Perception & Psychophysics,11, 5–9.
Krueger, L. E. (1982). Single judgments of numerosity.Perception & Psychophysics,31, 175–182.
Minturn, A. L., &Reese, T. W. (1951). The effect of differential reinforcement on the discrimination of visual number.Journal of Psychology,31, 201–231.
Poulton, E. C. (1979). Models for biases in judging sensory magnitudes.Psychological Bulletin,86, 777–803.
Siegel, S. (1956).Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Stevens, S. S. (1957). On the psychophysical law.Psychological Review,64, 153–181.
Stevens, S. S. (1966). Regression effect in psychophysical judgment.Perception & Psychophysics,1, 439–446.
Stevens, S. S. (1971). Issues in psychophysical measurement.Psychological Review,78,426–450.
Teghtsoonian, M. (1965). The judgment of size.American Journal of Psychology,78, 392–402.
Teghtsoonian, M., &Teghtsoonian, R. (1983). Consistency of individual exponents in cross-modal matching.Perception & Psychophysics,33, 203–214.
Teghtsoonian, R. (1971). On the exponents in Stevens’ law and the constant in Ekman’s law.Psychological Review,78, 71–80.
Teghtsoonian, R., &Teghtsoonian, M. (1978). Range and regression effects in magnitude scaling.Perception & Psychophysics,24, 305–314.
van Oeffelen, M. P., &Vos, P. G. (1982). A probabilistic model for the discrimination of visual number.Perception & Psychophysics,32, 163–170.
Wanschura, R. G., &Dawson, W. E. (1974). Regression effect and individual power functions over sessions.Journal of Experimental Psychology,102, 806–812.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Krueger, L.E. Perceived numerosity: A comparison of magnitude production, magnitude estimation, and discrimination judgments. Perception & Psychophysics 35, 536–542 (1984). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205949
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205949