Abstract
Although copious research has investigated the role of phonology in reading, little research has investigated the precise nature of the entailed speech representations. The present study examined the similarity of “inner speech” in reading to overt speech. Two lexical decision experiments (in which participants gave speeded word/nonword classifications to letter strings) assessed the effects of implicit variations in vowel and word-initial consonant length. Responses were generally slower for phonetically long stimuli than for phonetically short stimuli, despite equal orthographic lengths. Moreover, the phonetic length effects displayed principled interactions with common factors known to affect lexical decisions, such as word frequency and the similarity of words to nonwords. Both phonetic length effects were stronger among slower readers. The data suggest that acoustic representations activated in silent reading are best characterized as inner speech rather than as abstract phonological codes.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Anderson, R. D. (1982). Speech imagery is not always faster than visual imagery.Memory & Cognition,10, 371–380.
Baddeley, A. D, Thomson, N., &Buchanan, M. (1975). Word length and the structure of short-term memory.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,14, 575–589.
Balota, D. A., &Chumbley, J. I. (1984). Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 340–357.
Chen, M. (1970). Vowel length variation as a function of the voicing of the consonant environment.Phonetica,22, 129–159.
Chomsky, N., &Halle, M. (1968).Sound patterns of English. New York: Harper & Row.
Clark, H. H. (1973). The “language as fixed effect” fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,12, 335–359.
Coltheart, M. (1978). Lexical access in simple reading tasks. In G. Underwood (Ed.),Strategies of information processing (pp. 151–216). London: Academic Press.
Coltheart, M, Besner, D, Jonasson, J. T., &Davelaar, E. (1979). Phonological encoding in the lexical decision task.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,31, 489–505.
Dell, G. S., &Repka, R. J. (1993). Errors in inner speech. In B. J. Baars (Ed.),Experimental slips and human errors: Exploring the architecture of volition (pp. 237–262). New York: Plenum.
Donnenworth-Nolan, S, Tanenhaus, M., &Seidenberg, M. S. (1981). Multiple code activation in word recognition: Evidence from rhyme monitoring.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,7, 170–180.
Faaborg-Anderson, K., &Edfeldt, A. W. (1958). Electromyography of intrinsic and extrinsic laryngeal muscles during silent speech correlate with reading activity.Acta Otolaryngology,49, 478–482.
Foss, D. J., &Hakes, D. T. (1978).Psycholinguistics: An introduction to the psychology of language. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Fredriksen, J., &Kroll, J. (1976). Spelling and sound: Approaches to the internal lexicon.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,2, 361–379.
Glushko, R. J. (1979). The organization of orthographic knowledge in reading aloud.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,5, 674–691.
Gough, P. B. (1972). One second of reading. In J. F. Kavanagh& I. G. Mattingly (Eds.),Language by ear and by eye (pp. 331–358). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Grainger, J, O’Regan, K. J, Jacobs, A. M., &Segui, J. (1989). On the role of competing word units in visual word recognition: The neighborhood frequency effect.Perception & Psychophysics,45, 189–195.
Hanson, V. L, Goodell, E. W., &Perfetti, C. A. (1991). Tonguetwister effects in the silent reading of hearing and deaf college students.Journal of Memory & Language,30, 319–330.
Hardyck, C. D., &Petrinovich, L. F. (1970). Subvocal speech and comprehension level as a function of difficulty level of the reading material.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,9, 647–652.
Healy, A. F. (1976). Detection errors on the word the: Evidence for reading units larger than letters.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,2, 235–242.
House, A. S., &Fairbanks, G. (1953). The influence of consonant environment upon secondary acoustical characteristics of vowels.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,25, 106–113.
Huey, E. B. (1968).The psychology and pedagogy of reading. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Original work published 1908)
Jared, D, McRae, K., &Seidenberg, M. S. (1990). The basis of consistency effects in word meaning.Journal of Memory & Language,29, 687–715.
Klapp, S. T. (1971). Implicit speech inferred from response latencies in same-different decisions.Journal of Experimental Psychology,91, 262–267.
Klatt, D. H. (1976). The linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: Acoustic and perceptual evidence.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,59, 1208–1221.
Klima, E. S., &Bellugi, U. (1979).The signs of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kučera, H., &Francis, W. N. (1967).Computational analysis of presentday American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
Ladefoged, P. (1975).A course in phonetics. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Lewellen, M. J, Goldinger, S. D, Pisoni, D. B., &Greene, B. G. (1993). Lexical familiarity and processing efficiency: Individual differences in naming, lexical decision, and semantic categorization.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,122, 316–330.
Luce, P. A., &Charles-Luce, J. (1985). Contextual effects on vowel duration, closure duration, and the consonant/vowel ratio in speech production.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,78, 1949–1957.
Lukatela, G., &Turvey, M. T. (1993). Phonemic similarity effects and prelexical phonology.Memory & Cognition,18, 128–152.
MacKay, D. G. (1981). The problem of rehearsal or mental practice.Journal of Motor Behavior,13, 274–285.
Marslen-Wilson, W. D., &Welsh, A. (1978). Processing interactions and lexical access during spoken word recognition in continuous speech.Cognitive Psychology,10, 29–63.
Massaro, D, Venezky, R., &Taylor, G. (1979). Orthographic regularity, positional frequency, and visual processing of letter strings.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,108, 107–124.
McClelland, J. L., &Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interaction activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings.Psychological Review,88, 375–407.
McCusker, L, Hillinger, M., &Bias, R. (1981). Phonological recoding and reading.Psychological Bulletin,89, 217–245.
McCutchen, D., &Perfetti, C. (1982). The visual tongue-twister effect: Phonological activation in silent reading.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,21, 672–687.
McGuigan, F. J. (1984). How is linguistic memory accessed? A psychophysiological approach.Pavlovian Journal of Biological Science,19, 119–138.
Meyer, D. E, Schvaneveldt, R. W., &Ruddy, M. G. (1974). Functions of graphemic and phonemic codes in visual word recognition.Memory & Cognition,2, 309–321.
Nusbaum, H. C, Pisoni, D. B., &Davis, C. K. (1984).Sizing up the Hoosier mental lexicon: Measuring the familiarity of 20,000 words (Research on Speech Perception Progress Report No. 10). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Perfetti, C. A, Zhang, S., &Berent, I. (1992). Reading in English and Chinese: Evidence for a “universal” phonological principle. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.),Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 227–248). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Peterson, G., &Lehiste, I. (1960). Durations of syllabic nuclei in English.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,32, 693–703.
Port, R. (1979). Relation between voice onset time and vowel duration.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,66, 654–662.
Port, R. (1981). Linguistic timing factors in combination.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,69, 262–274.
Reed, H. B. (1916). The existence and function of inner speech in thought processes.Journal of Experimental Psychology,1, 365–392.
Rohrman, N. L., &Gough, P. B. (1967). Forewarning, meaning, and semantic decision latency.Psychonomic Science,9, 217–218.
Seidenberg, M. S., &McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming.Psychological Review,96, 523–568.
Seidenberg, M. S, Waters, G, Barnes, M., &Tanenhaus, M. (1984). When does irregular spelling or pronunciation influence word recognition?Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,23, 383–404.
Sharf, D. (1962). Duration of post-stress intervocalic consonants and preceding vowels.Language & Speech,5, 25–30.
Smith, S. M, Brown, H, Toman, J., &Goodman, L. S. (1947). The lack of cerebral effects of D-tubocararine.Anesthesiology,8, 1–14.
Sokolov, A. N. (1972).Inner speech and thought. New York: Plenum.
Spoehr, K., &Smith, E. (1971). The role of orthographic and phonotactic rules in perceiving letter patterns.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,104, 21–34.
Stevens, K. N., &House, A. S. (1963). Perturbations of vowel articulations by consonantal context: An acoustical study.Journal of Speech & Hearing Research,6, 111–128.
Stone, G. O., &Van Orden, G. C. (1993). Strategic processes in printed word recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,19, 744–774.
Stricker, S. S. (1880). Studien über die Sprachvorstellungen [Studies of imagined speech]. Vienna: Braumiller.
Umeda, N. (1975). Vowel duration in American English.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,58, 434–445.
Umeda, N. (1977). Consonant duration in American English.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,61, 846–858.
Van Orden, G. C. (1987). A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound and reading.Memory & Cognition,15, 181–198.
Van Orden, G. C., &Goldinger, S. D. (1994). Interdependence of form and function in cognitive systems explains perception of printed words.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 1269–1291.
Van Orden, G. C, Pennington, B. F., &Stone, G. O. (1990). Word identification in reading and the promise of subsymbolic psycholinguistics.Psychological Review,97, 488–522.
Waters, G. S., &Seidenberg, M. S. (1985). Spelling-sound effects in reading: Time course and decision criteria.Memory & Cognition,13, 557–572.
Watson, J. B. (1919).Psychology from the standpoint of a behaviorist. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott.
Weber, R. J., &Castleman, J. (1970). The time it takes to imagine.Perception & Psychophysics,8, 165–168.
Whaley, C. P. (1978). Word-nonword classification time.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,17, 143–154.
Zhang, S., &Perfetti, C. A. (1993). The tongue-twister effect in reading Chinese.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 1082–1093.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was originally reported in the first author’s Master’s thesis. Support was provided by an Arizona State University Research Incentive Award and by NIDCD Grant R29-DC02629-02 to S.D.G.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Abramson, M., Goldinger, S.D. What the reader’s eye tells the mind’s ear: Silent reading activates inner speech. Perception & Psychophysics 59, 1059–1068 (1997). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205520
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205520