Abstract
Using a short-term recognition technique, musically experienced and musically inexperienced subjects indicated whether or not the contour of a probe, consisting of a sequence of six tones (auditory) or of a marker changing positions on each of six vertical lines (visual), was the same as that of an auditory or visual target presented just before. Thus there were four modality conditions: auditory target-auditory probe (A-A), auditory target-visual probe (A-V), visual target-auditory probe CV-A), and visual target-visual probe (V-V). All subjects were tested at five different presentation rates: 1/10, 1/4, 1/2, 1, and 2 sec per note/position. For the A-V, V-A, and V-V conditions, recognition accuracy increased as presentation rate became slower. However, for purely auditory recognition (A-A), accuracy increased more slowly (for musically experienced subjects) or not at all (for inexperienced ones). This interaction of modality condition and rate is discussed in terms of its implications for the abstraction of contour from melody.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Achim, A., &Bregman, A. S. (1973). Visual stream segregation.Perception & Psychophysics,13, 451–454.
Attneave, F. (1954). Some informational aspects of visual perception.Psychological Review,61, 183–193.
Baker, M. A., &Loeb, M. (1973). Implications of measurements of eye fixations for a psychophysics of form perception.Perception & Psychophysics,13, 185–192,
Balch, W. R. (1984). The effects of auditory and visual interference on the immediate recall of melody.Memory & Cognition,12, 581–589.
Bartlett, J. D., &Dowling, W. J. (1980). The recognition of transposed melodies: A key distance effect in developmental perspective.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,6, 501–515.
Bregman, A. S. (1978). The formation of auditory streams. In J. Requin (Ed.),Attention and performance VII (pp. 63–75). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bregman, A. S., &Campbell, J. (1971). Primary auditory stream segregation and perception of order in rapid sequences of tones.Journal of Experimental Psychology,89, 244–249.
Bregman, A. S., &Rudnicky, A. I. (1975). Auditory segregation: Stream or streams?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,1, 263–267.
Brooks, L. R. (1968). Spatial and verbal components of the act of recallCanadian Journal of Psychology,22, 349–368.
Chase, W. G., &Calfee, A. C. (1969). Modality and similarity effects in short-term recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology,81, 510–514.
Dowling, W. J. (1978) Scale and contour: Two components of a theory of memory for melodies.Psychological Review,85, 341–354.
Dowling, W. J. (1982). Contour in context: Comments on Edworthy.Psychomusicology,2, 47–48.
Dowling, W J, &Bartlett, J. C. (1981). The importance of interval information in long-term memory for melodies.Psychomusicology,1, 30–49.
Dowling, W. J., &Fujitani, D. S. (1971). Contour, interval and pitch recognition in memory for melodies.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,49, 524–531.
Dyson, M. C., &Watkins, A. J. (1984). A figurai approach to the role of melodic contour in melody recognition.Perception & Psychophysics,35, 477–488.
Edworthy, J. (1982) Pitch and contour m music processing.Psychomusicology,1, 44–46.
Garner, W. R., &Gottwald, R. L. (1968). The perception and learning of temporal patterns.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,20, 97–109.
Idson, W. L., &Massaro, D. W. (1978) A bidimensional model of pitch in the recognition of melodies.Perception & Psychophysics,24, 551–565.
Loftus, G. R. (1978). On interpretation of interactions.Memory & Cognition,6, 312–319.
O’leary, A., &Rhodes, G. (1984). Cross-modal effects on visual and auditory object perception.Perception & Psychophysics,35, 565–569.
Swets, J. A. (1973). The relative operating characteristic in psychology.Science,182, 990–1000.
Trehub, S. E., Bull, D., &Thorpe, L. A. (1984). Infants’ perception of melodies: The role of melodic contour.Child Development,55, 821–830.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This work was supported by a Pennsylvania State University Faculty Development Grant to the first author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Balch, W.R., Muscatelli, D.L. The interaction of modality condition and presentation rate in short-term contour recognition. Perception & Psychophysics 40, 351–358 (1986). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203027
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203027