Abstract
In Experiment 1, subjects responded with a buttonpress to a target letter O embedded in a pair of vertical lines. A flanker control method was used to constrain the location and size of the initial attentional focus. The target could appear in one of five locations within a particular horizontal range. There were five ranges, varying from 1.7° to 8.6° in visual angle. Reaction time measures to the target exhibited V-shaped curves, with the lowest reaction time corresponding to the location of the initial focus of attention. The slopes of the curves decreased monotonically with target ranges. Reaction time measures at the extreme locations of the five ranges showed no significant increase with eccentricity, indicating that the influence of retinal sensitivity is negligible in this identification task as compared with the influence of other, presumably attentional, processes. Experiment 2 indicated that within a given range the slopes of the reaction time curves are independent of the number of locations probed. Additional evidence for the attentional range effect was given in Experiments 3 and 4, in which the tasks were detection of an asterisk both with and without flanking vertical lines and identification of the letter O with and without flanking lines. These results do not conform to predictions of a shifting focus theory of attention with the velocity of the focus assumed to be constant, or to the predictions of a gradient theory with total processing capacity assumed to be fixed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anstis, S. M. (1974). A chart demonstrating variations in acuity with retinal position.Vision Research,14, 589–592.
Bergen, J. R., &.Julesz, B. (1983). Focal attention in rapid pattern discrimination.Nature,303, 694–698.
Downing, C. J., &Pinker, S. (1985). The spatial structure of visual attention. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Mann (Eds.),Perception and performance XL Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Erjksen, C. W., &Hoffman, J. E. (1972a). Some characteristics of selective attention in visual perception determined by foveal reaction time.Perception & Psychophysics,11, 169–171.
Eriksen, C. W., &Hoffman, J. E. (1972b). Temporal and spatial characteristics of selection coding from visual displays.Perception & Psychophysics,12, 201–204.
Eriksen, C. W., &Hoffman, J. E. (1973). The extent of processing of noise elements during selective coding from visual displays.Perception & Psychophysics,14, 155–160.
Eriksen, C. W., &Rohrbaugh, J. W. (1970). Some factors determining efficacy of selective attention.American Journal of Psychology,83, 330–343.
Eriksen, C. W , & St. James, J. E. (in press) Focusing attention in the visual field’ A zoom lens model.Perception & Psychophysics.
Eriksen, C. W., &Schultz, D. W. (1977) Retinal locus and acuity in visual information processing.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,9, 81–84
Eriksen, C. W., &Yeh, Y. (1985). Allocation of attention in the visual field.Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception & Performance,11, 583–597
Green, D. G. (1970). Regional variations in the visual acuity for interference fringes on the retina.Journal of Physiology,207, 351 -356
Hillyard, S. A. &Munte, T. F. (1984). Selective attention to color and location: An analysis with event-related brain potentials.Perception & Psychophysics,36, 185–198
Hoffman, J. E. (1975) Hierarchical stages in the processing of visual information.Perception & Psychophysics,18, 348–354.
James, W. (1890).The principles of psychology New York Dover
Jonides, J. (1980). Toward a model of the mind’s eye.Canadian Journal of Psychology,34, 103–112
Jonides, J. (1981). Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind’s eye movement. In J. Long & A. Baddeley (Eds.),Attention and performance, IX. Hillsdale, NJ Erlbaum
Julesz, B. (1984). Toward an axiomatic theory of preattentive vision. In G. M. Edelman, W. E. Gall, & W. M. Cowan (Eds.),Dynamic aspects of neocortical function. New York. Wiley.
Kahneman, D. (1973)Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Laberge, D. (1973) Identification of two components of the time to switch attention: A test of a serial and a parallel model of attention In S. Kornblum (Ed.),Attention and performance, IV (pp. 71–85) New York: Academic Press
Laberge, D. (1983) The spatial extent of attention to letters and words.Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance,9, 371–379
Navon, D. (1985). Attention division or attention sharing. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Mann (Eds.),Perception and performance XI. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Norman, D. A., &Bobrow, D. J. (1975). On data-limited and resourcelimited processes.Cognitive Psychology,7, 44–64.
Osterberg, G. (1935). Topography of the layer of rods and cones in the human retina.Acta Ophthalmology Supplement,6, 11–97.
Polyak, S. L. (1957).The vertebrate visual system. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,32, 3–25.
Posner, M. I., Nissen, M. J., &Ogden, W. C. (1978). Attended and unattended processing modes: The role of set for spatial location. In H. L. Peck & I. J. Saltzman (Eds.),Modes of perceiving and processing information. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Riggs, L. (1965). Visual acuity. In C. H. Graham (Ed.),Vision and visual perception. New York: Wiley.
Shaw, M. L. (1978). A capacity allocation model for reaction time.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,4, 586–598.
Shaw, M. L., &Shaw, P. (1977). Optimal allocation of cognitive resources to spatial locations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,3, 201–211.
Shulman, G. L., Remington, R. W., &Mclean, J. P. (1979). Moving attention through visual space.Journal of Experimental Psychology,5, 522–526.
Shulman, G. L., Wilson, J., &Sheehy, J. B. (1985). Spatial determinants of the distribution of attention.Perception & Psychophysics,37, 59–65.
Treisman, A. M., &Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration model of attention.Cognitive Psychology,12, 97–136.
Tsal, Y. (1983). Movements of attention across the visual field.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,9, 523–530.
Wickens, C. D. (1978). The effects of divided attention on information processing in manual tracking.Journal of Experimental Psychology,105, 1–17.
Yellott, J. I., Wandell, B. A., &Cornsweet, T. N. (1984). The beginnings of visual perception: The retinal image and its initial encoding. InHandbook of physiology: The nervous system (Vol. 3, pp. 257–316). Berlin: Springer
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Laberge, D., Brown, V. Variations in size of the visual field in which targets are presented: An attentional range effect. Perception & Psychophysics 40, 188–200 (1986). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203016
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203016