Abstract
This study was designed to analyze some performance factors as a possible source of sex-related bias in psychometric tests of visuospatial aptitude. Goldstein, Haldane, and Mitchell (1990) explored the effect of two response styles—slowness of performance and reluctance to guess—by using a 3-D mental rotation test (the task showing the largest cognitive sex difference) and found that time limits and raw scores contributed substantially to the male advantage. We applied two tests in thespeed-power continuum to a representative sample of 621 males and 821 females in their last year of high school in a 2 × 2 (gender × time) full factorial design. Reluctance to guess was similar for males and females. Males obtained more correct responses on both tests, and for both time conditions, than did females. These results are not only statistically significant but also are of substantial practical consequence.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bennet, G., Seashore, H., &Wesman, A. (1974).Differential Aptitude Test Manual (5th ed.) New York: Psychological Corp.
Ben-Shakhar, G., &Sinai, Y. (1991). Gender differences in multiplechoice tests: The role of differential guessing tendencies.Journal of Educational Measurement,28, 23–35.
Blough, P. M., &Slavin, L. K. (1987). Reaction time assessments of gender differences in visual-spatial performance.Perception & Psychophysics,41, 276–281.
Budescu, D., &Bar-Hillel, M. (1993). To guess or not to guess: A decision theoretic view of formula scoring.Journal of Educational Measurement,30, 277–291.
Burnett, S. A. (1986). Sex-related differences in spatial ability: Are they trivial?American Psychologist,41, 1012–1014.
Caplan, P. J., MacPherson, G. M., &Tobin, P. (1985). Do sex-related differences in spatial abilities exist?American Psychologist,40, 786–799.
Casey, M. B., Nuttall, R., Pezaris, E., &Benbow, C. P. (1995). The influence of spatial ability on gender differences in math college entrance test scores across diverse samples.Developmental Psychology,31, 697–705.
Connor, J. M., Schackman, M., &Serbin, L. A. (1978). Sex-related differences in response to practice on a visual-spatial test and generalization to a related test.Child Development,49, 24–29.
Eliot, J. (1986). Comment on Caplan, MacPherson, and Tobin.American Psychologist,41, 1011.
Eliot, J. (1987).Models of psychological space. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Eliot, J., &Smith, I. M. (1983).International directory of spatial tests. Slough, England: NFER-Nelson.
Feingold, A. (1988). Cognitive gender differences are disappearing.American Psychologist,43, 95–103.
Goldstein, D., Haldane, D., &Mitchell, C. (1990). Sex differences in visual-spatial ability: The role of performance factors.Memory & Cognition,18, 546–550.
Halpern, D. F. (1986). A different answer to the question, “Do sexrelated differences in spatial abilities exist?”American Psychologist,41, 1014–1015.
Halpern, D. F. (1992).Sex differences in cognitive abilities (2nd ed.) London: Erlbaum.
Hiscock, M. (1986). On sex-differences in spatial abilities.American Psychologist,41, 1011–1012.
Hyde, J. S. (1981). How large are cognitive gender differences? A meta-analysis using ω2 and δ.American Psychologist,36, 892–901.
Kimura, D. (1992, September). Sex differences in the brain.Scientific American,267, 119–125.
Lohman, D. F. (1979).Spatial ability: A review and reanalysis of the correlational literature (Tech. Rep. No. 8). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Maccoby, E. E., &Jacklin, C. N. (1974).The psychology of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Masters, M. S., &Sanders, B. (1993). Is the gender difference in mental rotation disappearing?Behavior Genetics,23, 337–341.
Parsons, J. E., Adler, T. F., &Kaczala, C. M. (1982). Socialization of achievement attitudes and beliefs: Parental influences.Child Development,53, 322–339.
Pellegrino, J. W., Alderton, D. L., &Shute, V. J. (1984). Understanding spatial ability.Educational Psychologist,19, 239–253.
Pellegrino, J. W., &Hunt, E. B. (1991). Cognitive models for understanding and assessing spatial abilities. In H. Rowe (Ed.),Intelligence: Reconceptualization and measurement (pp. 203–225). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Prieto, G., Carro, J., Pulido, R. F., Palenzuela, D. L., Orgaz, B., &Loro, P. (1994). Selección psicotécnica informatizada de los aspirantes a pilotos.Revista de Aeronáutica y Astronáutica,633, 429–431.
Regian, J. W., &Shute, V. J. (1993). Basic research on the pedagogy of automated instruction. In T. de Jong, H. Spada, & D. M. Towne (Eds.),The use of computer models for explication, analysis, and experiential learning (pp. 121–132). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Resnick, S. M. (1993). Sex differences in mental rotations: An effect of time limits?Brain & Cognition,21, 71–79.
Rosenthal, R., &Rubin, D. B. (1982). A simple, general purpose display of magnitude of experimental effect.Journal of Educational Psychology,74, 166–169.
Sanders, B., Soares, M. P., &D’Aquila, J. M. (1982). The sex difference on one test of spatial visualization: A nontrivial difference.Child Development,53, 1106–1109.
Shute, V. J., Pellegrino, J. W., Hubert, L., &Reynolds, R. W. (1983). The relationship between androgen levels and human spatial abilities.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,21, 465–468.
Steen, L. A. (1987). Mathematics education: A predictor of scientific competitiveness.Science,237, 251–252, 302.
Técnicos Especialistas Asociados (1990).DAT: Tests de aptitudes diferenciales. Manual (10th ed.) Madrid: Author.
Thurstone, T. G., &Thurstone, L. L. (1949).Mechanical aptitude II: Description of group tests (Report No. 54). Chicago: University of Chicago, Psychometric Laboratory.
Yela, M. (1968).Rotación de figuras macizas. Manual. Madrid: Técnicos Especialistas Asociados.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was partially supported by a grant from the Spanish Instituto de la Mujer (Ministerio de Asuntos Sociales) to A.R.D. and G.P.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Delgado, A.R., Prieto, G. Sex differences in visuospatial ability: Do performance factors play such an important role?. Mem Cogn 24, 504–510 (1996). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200938
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200938