Abstract
Splitting up the familiar tune “Yankee Doodle” by placing successive notes in different octaves makes it very difficult to recognize. The present experiments generalize this finding to more than one familiar tune and to presentation by actual musical instruments. Tunes differ in the degree to which their recognizability is affected by scrambling into different octaves, but recognition of all 10 tunes investigated was substantially diminished by the distortion. Increasing pitch proximity of temporally adjacent notes by leaving pairs or triples of successive notes intact within the same octave increases recognizability of at least some scrambled tunes. Leaving the melodic contour (the pattern of ups and downs) intact while splitting up the melody increases recognizability for subjects informed of the preservation of contour, though recognition is still worse than for undistorted versions.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blackwell, H. R., &Schlosberg, H. Octave generalization. pitch discrimination, and loudness thresholds in the white rat.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1943,33, 407–419.
Bregman, A. S., &Campbell, J. Primary auditory stream segregation and perception of order in rapid sequences of tones.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971,89, 244–249.
Deutsch, D. Octave generalization and tune recognition.Perception & Psychophysics, 1972,11, 411–412.
Deutsch, D. Octave generalization of specific interference effects in memory for tonal pitch.Perception & Psychophysics, 1973,13, 273–275.
Dowling, W. J. The perception of interleaved melodies.Cognitive Psychology, 1973,5, 322–337.
Dowling, W. J., &Fujitani, D. S. Contour, interval, and pitch recognition in memory for melodies.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1971,49, 524–531.
Frances, R.La perception de la musique. Paris: Vrin, 1958.
Grout, D. J.A history of western music. New York: Norton, 1960.
Hochberg, J. Perception: 1. Color and shape. In J. W. Kling & L. A. Riggs (Eds.).Experimental psychology (3rd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston. 1971. Pp. 395–474.
Kolinski, M. Review of A. P. Merriam Ethnomusicology of the Flathead Indians.Ethnomusicology, 1970,14, 77–99.
Miller, G. A., &Heise, G. A. The trill threshold.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1950,22, 637–638.
Noorden, L. Van. Rhythmic fission as a function of tone rate.Institute for Perception Research. Annual Progress Report. 1971,6, 9–12.
Noorden, L. Van.Temporal coherence in the perception of tone sequences. Eindhoven. The Netherlands: Institute for Perception Research, 1975.
Terhardt, E. Pitch, consonance, and harmony.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1974,55, 1061–1069.
Ward, W. D. Subjective musical pitch.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1954,26, 369–380.
Ward, W. D. Absolute pitch.Sound, 1963,2(3), 14–21. & 2(4). 33–41.
Webern, A.Symphonie. Op. 21. Vienna: Universal Edition, 1929.
White, B. Recognition of distorted melodies.American Journal of Psychology, 1960,73, 100–107.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dowling, W.J., Hollombe, A.W. The perception of melodies distorted by splitting into several octaves: Effects of increasing proximity and melodic contour. Perception & Psychophysics 21, 60–64 (1977). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199469
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199469