Abstract
Exponential growth presented by numerical series or graphs is grossly underestimated by human subjects. This misperception was considerably lessened by presenting decreasing functions; this conclusion holds for both numeric and graphic stimuli. In the numerical conditions, about 25% of the subjects performed according to the statistical norm. In contrast with previous results, considerable individual differences with respect to sensitivity for rate of growth were observed. This finding was interpreted in terms of task difficulty: Extrapolation of ascending series is too difficult a task to be discriminative. Extrapolation of descending series is much easier, and may therefore better discriminate among subjects.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dawes, R. M.Fundamentals of artitude measurement. New York: Wiley. 1972.
Jones, G. V. Polynomial perception of exponential growth.Perception & Psychophysics, 1977,21, 197–198.
Siegel, S.Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1956.
Tversky, A., &Kahneman, D. Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability.Cognitive Psychology, 1973,5, 207–232.
Wagenaar, W. A., &Sagasia, S. Misperception of exponential growth.Perception & Psychophysics, 1975,18, 416–422.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Timmers, H., Wagenaar, W.A. Inverse statistics and misperception of exponential growth. Perception & Psychophysics 21, 558–562 (1977). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198737
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198737