Abstract
Auditory pulses (1,000 Hz) occurring between the 500-Hz bounding markers of durations being judged were varied in their position and number over three experiments which examined the effects of these factors on measures of amount of filled-duration illusion (FDI) and interduration discriminability. The results establish that the locus of the FDI is postattentive, since some of the incoming sensory information, selected on the basis of simple physical cues, can be excluded from further processing. FDI decreases both when the intervening stimuli come from a different source (earphone channel) to the marker stimuli and when they appear as part of an ongoing sequence of background pulses. Discrimination of durations containing intervening stimuli is enhanced if the filler events are placed such that repetitions of a given subinterval result. Thomas and Brown’s (1974) “chunking” model can account for the observed effects with the additional assumption that the error associated with encoding a given subinterval is sequentially modified as a function of number of recent encodings.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Buffardi, L. Factors affecting the filled-duration illusion in the auditory, tactual and visual modalities.Perception & Psychophysics. 1971,10, 292–294.
Creelman, C. D. Human discrimination of auditory duration.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1962,34, 582–593.
Green, D. M., &Swets, J. A.Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley, 1966.
Grimm, K. Der Einfluss der Zeitform auf die Wahrnehmung der Zeitdauer.Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 1934,132, 104–132. (Cited by Buffardi. 1971).
Handel, S., &Yoder, D. The effects of intensity and interval rhythms on the perception of auditory and visual temporal patterns.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1975,27, 111–122.
Israeli, N. Illusions in the perception of short time intervals.Archives of Psychology, 1930,18, No. 113.
McNicol, D.A primer of signal detection theory. London: George Allen & Unwin. 1972.
Maloney, T., &Calloway, E. The effect of the repeated presentation of a standard interval on the reproduction of the standard.Perception & Psychophysics, 1971,10, 356–357.
Michon, J. A. Studies on subjective duration I. Differential sensitivity in the perception of repeated temporal intervals.Acta Psychologica, 1964,22, 441–450.
Ornstein, R.On the experience of time. Baltimore: Penguin Books. 1969.
Pollack, I. Auditory flutter.American Journal of Psychology, 1952,65, 544–554.
Renshaw, S. An experimental comparison of the production, and auditory discrimination by absolute impression, of a constant tempo.Psychological Bulletin, 1932,29, 659.
Schönemann, P. H., &Tucker, L. R. A maximum likelihood solution for the method of successive intervals allowing for unequal stimulus dispersions.Psychometrika, 1967,32, 403–417.
Thomas, E. A. C., &Brown, I. Time perception and the filledduration illusion.Perception & Psychophysics, 1974,16, 449–458.
Thomas, E. A. C. &Weaver, W. B. Cognitive processing and time perception.Perception & Psychophysics, 1975,17, 363–367.
Ward, L. M., &Lockhead, G. R. Sequential effects and memory in category judgements.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1970,84, 27–34.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Adams, R.D. Intervening stimulus effects on category judgments of duration. Perception & Psychophysics 21, 527–534 (1977). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198733
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198733