Abstract
Previous results have implied that pattern goodness, as defined by rotation/reflection equivalence set size, is a determinant of encoding time. A direct test of this implication was made via a discrete RT task using good and poor dot patterns in a two-stimulus discrimination. The following discrimination conditions were used: (1) good vs good; (2) poor vs poor; and (3) good vs poor. Overall RTs for Conditions 1 and 3 were equal, but each was significantly faster than Condition 2. In the first two conditions, there was no difference in RT within pairs and no consistent transitive ordering of the patterns. In Condition 3, however, the good pattern consistently produced the smaller RT. These results indicate that patterns of equal goodness are equally encodable, and the better the pattern, the faster it is encoded. In addition, there was evidence that pattern similarity affects RT.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Checkosky, S. F., &Whitlock.D. Effects of pattern goodness on recognition time in a memory search lask.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971,100, 341–348.
Clement, D. E., &Varnadof, K. W. Pattern uncertainty and the discrimination of visual patterns.Perception & Psychophysics. 1967,2, 427–431.
Garner, W. R.The processing of information and structure. Potomac. Md: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1974.
Garner.W. R., &Clement, D. E. Goodness of pattern and pattern uncertaintyJournal of Vernal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 1963,2, 146–152.
Sternberg, S. Two operations incharacter recognition: Some evidence from reaction time measurements.Perception & Psychophysics, 1967,2, 45–53.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by Grant MH 14229 Irontthe National Institute of Mental Health to Yale University.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Garner, W.R., Sutliff, D. The effect of goodness onencoding time in visual pattern discrimination. Perception & Psychophysics 16, 426–430 (1974). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198567
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198567