Abstract
In two experiments, we investigated the possibility that susceptibility to proactive interference (PI) affects performance on memory span measures. We tested both younger and older adults (older adults were tested because of the suggestion that they are differentially susceptible to PI). We used two different span measures and manipulated testing procedures to reduce PI for these tasks. For older adults, span estimates increased with each PI-reducing manipulation; for younger adults, scores increased when multiple PI manipulations were combined or when PI-reducing manipulations were used in paradigms in which within-task PI was especially high. The findings suggest that PI critically influences span performance. We consider the possibility that interference-proneness may influence cognitive behaviors previously thought to be governed by capacity.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allport, A. (1989). Visual attention. In M. I. Posner (Ed.),Foundations of cognitive science (pp. 631–682). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Anderson, J. R. (1983).The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Baddeley, A. (1986).Working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Baddeley, A. D., &Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 8, pp. 47–89). New York: Academic Press.
Borkowski, J. G. (1965). Interference effects in short-term memory as a function of level of intelligence.American Journal of Mental Deficiency,70, 458–465.
Charness, N. (1987). Component processes in bridge bidding and novel problem-solving tasks.Canadian Journal of Psychology,41, 223–243.
Conrad, R., &Hull, A. J. (1964). Information, acoustic confusion and memory span.British Journal of Psychology,55, 429–432.
Conway, A., &Engle, R. (1994). Working memory and retrieval: A resource-dependent inhibition model.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,123, 354–373.
Craik, F. I. M., &Byrd, M. (1982). Aging and cognitive deficits: The role of attentional processes. In F. I. M. Craik & S. Trehub (Eds.),Aging and cognitive processes (pp. 191–211). New York: Plenum.
Crowder, R. G. (1976).Principles of learning and memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Daneman, M., &Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,19, 450–466.
Daneman, M., &Green, I. (1986). Individual differences in comprehending and producing words in context.Journal of Memory & Language,25, 1–18.
Daneman, M., &Merikle, P. M. (1996). Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,3, 422–433.
Dempster, F. N. (1981). Memory span and short-term memory capacity: A developmental study.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,4, 419–431.
Dempster, F. N. (1985). Proactive interference in sentence recall: Topicsimilarity effects and individual differences.Memory & Cognition,13, 81–89.
Dempster, F. N., &Cooney, J. B. (1982). Individual differences in digit span, susceptibility to proactive interference, and aptitude/achievement test scores.Intelligence,6, 399–416.
Educational Testing Service (1976).Kit of factor-referenced tests. Princeton, NJ: Author.
Engle, R. W., Cantor, J., &Carullo, J. J. (1992). Individual differences in working memory and comprehension: A test of four hypotheses.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 972–992.
Engle, R.W., Carullo, J. J., &Collins, K.W. (1991). Individual differences in working memory for comprehension and following directions.Journal of Educational Research,84, 253–262.
Engle, R.W., Conway, R., Tuholski, S.W., &Shisler, R. J. (1995). A resource account of inhibition.Psychological Science,6, 122–125.
Fry, A., &Hale, S. (1996). Processing speed, working memory, and fluid intelligence: Evidence for a developmental cascade.Psychological Science,7, 237–241.
Gerard, L., Zacks, R. T., Hasher, L., &Radvansky, G. A. (1991). Age deficits in retrieval: The fan effect.Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences,46, 131–136.
Gick, M. L., Craik, F. I. M., &Morris, R. G. (1988). Task complexity and age differences in working memory.Memory & Cognition,16, 353–361.
Hamm, V. P., &Hasher, L. (1992). Age and the availability of inferences.Psychology & Aging,7, 56–64.
Hartman, M., &Hasher, L. (1991). Aging and suppression: Memory for previously relevant information.Psychology & Aging,6, 587–594.
Hasher, L., &Zacks, R. T. (1988). Working memory, comprehension, and aging: A review and a new view. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 22, pp. 193–225). San Diego: Academic Press.
Hasher, L., Zacks, R. T., &May, C. P. (1999). Inhibitory control, circadian arousal, and age. In A. Koriat & D. Gopher (Eds.),Attention and performance XVII (pp. 653–675). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Jensen, A. R. (1964).Individual differences in learning: Interference factor (Final Rep., Cooperative Research Project No. 1897). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Office of Education.
Just, M. A., &Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension.Psychological Review,87, 329–354.
Just, M. A., &Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory.Psychological Review,99, 122–149.
Kahneman, D. (1973).Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Kane, M. J., &Hasher, L. (1995). Interference. In G. Maddox (Ed.),Encyclopedia of aging (2nd ed., pp. 514–516). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Kausler, D. H. (1974).Psychology of verbal learning and memory. New York: Academic Press.
Kyllonen, P. C., &Christal, R. E. (1990). Reasoning ability is (little more than) working-memory capacity?!Intelligence,14, 389–433.
Kyllonen, P. C., &Stephens, D. L. (1990). Cognitive abilities as determinants of success in acquiring logic skill.Learning & Individual Differences,2, 129–160.
Lustig, C., & Hasher, L. (1998).Working memory span: The role of interference from the past. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Masson, M. E. J., &Miller, J. A. (1983). Working memory and individual differences in comprehension and memory of text.Journal of Educational Psychology,75, 314–418.
McDowd, J. M., Oseas-Kreger, D. M., &Filion, D. L. (1995). Inhibitory processes in cognition and aging. In F. N. Dempster & C. J. Brainerd (Eds.),Interference and inhibition in cognition (pp. 363–401). San Diego: Academic Press.
Navon, D. (1988a). The importance of being visible: On the role of attention in a mind viewed as an anarchic intelligence system. I. Basic tenets.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,1, 191–213.
Navon, D. (1988b). The importance of being visible: On the role of attention in a mind viewed as an anarchic intelligence system. II. Basic tenets.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,1, 215–238.
Rabinowitz, J. C., Craik, F. I. M., &Ackerman, B. P. (1982). A processing resource account of age differences in recall.Canadian Journal of Psychology,36, 325–344.
Rosner, S. R. (1972). Primacy in preschooler’s short-term memory: The effects of repeated tests and shift-trials.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,13, 220–230.
Salthouse, T. A. (1988). The role of processing resources in cognitive aging. In M. L. Howe & C. J. Brainerd (Eds.),Cognitive development in adulthood (pp. 185–239). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Shah, P., &Miyake, A. (1996). The separability of working memory resources for spatial thinking and language processing: An individual differences approach.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,125, 4–27.
Shute, V. J. (1991). Who is likely to acquire programming skills?Journal of Educational Computing Research,7, 1–24.
Traxler, A. J. (1973). Retroactive and proactive inhibition in young and elderly adults using an unpaced modified recall test.Psychological Reports,32, 215–222.
Underwood, B. J. (1957). Interference and forgetting.Psychological Review,64, 49–60.
Watkins, O. C., &Watkins, M. J. (1975). Build-up of proactive inhibition as a cue-overload effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,1, 442–452.
Wickens, D. D., &Cammarata, S. A. (1986). Response class interference in STM.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,24, 266–268.
Wickens, D. D., &Gittis, M. M. (1974). The temporal course of recovery from interference and degree of learning in the Brown-Peterson paradigm.Journal of Experimental Psychology,102, 1021–1026.
Winocur, G., &Moscovitch, M. (1983). Paired associate learning in institutionalized and noninstitutionalized old people: An analysis of interference and context effects.Journal of Geronotology,38, 455–464.
Young, C.W., &Supa, M. (1941). Mnemic inhibition as a factor in the limitation of the memory span.American Journal of Psychology,54, 546–552.
Zacks, R. T., Radvansky, G. A., &Hasher, L. (1996). Studies of directed forgetting in older adults.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 143–156.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by Grant 4306 from the National Institute on Aging.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
May, C.P., Hasher, L. & Kane, M.J. The role of interference in memory span. Memory & Cognition 27, 759–767 (1999). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198529
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198529