Abstract
Two experiments were carried out to investigate the roles of joint accent structure and familiarity in delayed recognition of relatively long tonal melodies. Melodic themes of target melodies were defined by correlating contour-related pitch accents with temporal accents (accent coupling) during an initial familiarization phase. Later, subjects gave recognition responses to key-transposed versions of the target melodies as well as to decoys withsame anddifferent contour accent patterns. In Experiment 1, all to-be-recognized melodies occurred both in an original rhythm, which preserved accent coupling, and in a new rhythm, which did not. Listeners were best at distinguishing targets fromdifferent decoys, especially in the original rhythm. In Experiment 2, the familiarity of target tunes and the rhythmic similarity in recognition were varied.Similar rhythms preserved accent coupling, whereasdissimilar rhythms did not. Listeners were most adept in distinguishing familiar targets fromdifferent decoys (Experiment 2A), particularly when they appeared in novel but similar rhythms. However, insimilar rhythm conditions, listeners also frequently mistooksame decoys for targets. With less familiar targets (Experiment 2B), these effects were attenuated, and performance showed general effects of pitch contour.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bamber, C. (1975). The area above the ordinal dominance graph and the area below the receiver operating characteristic graph.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,12, 387–415.
Bartlett, J. C., &Dowling, W. J. (1980). The recognition of transposed melodies: A key-distance effect in developmental perspective.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,6, 501–515.
Boltz, M., &Jones, M. R. (1986). Does rule recursion make melodies easier to reproduce? If not, what does?Cognitive Psychology,18, 389–431.
Burbidge, S., &Jones, M. R. (1982). The function of rule-governed serial contexts in recognition of embedded tones.Psychomusicology,2, 47–63.
Butler, D., &Brown, H. (1984). Tonal structure versus function: Studies of the recognition of harmonic motion.Music Perception,2, 6–24.
Davison, T. C. B., &Jagacinski, R. J. (1977). Nonparametric analysis of signal detection confidence ratings.Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation,9, 545–546.
Deliege, I. (1987). Grouping conditions in listening to music: An approach to Lerdahl & Jackendoff’s grouping preference rules.Music Perception,4, 325–359.
Deutsch, D. (1980). The processing of structured and unstructured tonal sequences.Perception & Psychophysics,28, 381–389.
Dowling, W. J. (1973). Rhythmic groups and subjective chunks in memory for melodies.Perception & Psychophysics,14, 37–40.
Dowling, W. J. (1978). Scale and contour: Two components of a theory of memory for melodies.Psychological Review,85, 341–354.
Dowling, W. J., &Barlett, J. C. (1981). The importance of interval information in long-term memory for melodies.Psychomusicology,1, 30–49.
Dowling, W. J., &Fujitani, D. S. (1971). Contour, interval, and pitch recognition in memory for melodies.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,49, 524–531.
Dowling, W. J., &Harwood, D. L. (1986).Music Cognition. New York: Academic Press.
Dyson, M. C., &Watkins, A. J. (1984). A figural approach to the role of melodic contour in melody recognition.Perception & Psychophysics,35, 477–488.
Edworthy, J. (1985). Melodic contour and musical structure. In P. Howell, I. Cross, & R. West (Eds.),Musical structure and cognition (pp. 169–188). New York: Academic Press.
Handel, S. (1984). Using polyrhythms to study rhythm.Music Perception,1, 465–484.
Handel, S. (1989).Listening: An introduction to perception of auditory events. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Idson, W. L., &Massaro, D. W. (1976). Cross-octave masking of single tones and musical sequences: The effects of Structure on auditory recognition.Perception & Psychophysics,19, 155–175.
Jones, M. R. (1976). Time, our lost dimension: Toward a new theory of perception, attention, and memory.Psychological Review,83, 323–355.
Jones, M. R. (1981). Music as a stimulus for psychological motion: Part I. Some determinants of expectancies.Psychomusicology,1, 34–51.
Jones, M. R. (1982). Music as a stimulus for psychological motion: Part II. An expectancy model.Psychomusicology,2, 1–13.
Jones, M. R. (1985). Structural organization of events in time. In J. Michon & J. Jackson-Roy (Eds.),Time, mind, and behavior (pp. 192–214). Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
Jones, M. R. (1987). Dynamic pattern structure in music: Recent theory and research.Perception & Psychophysics,41, 621–634.
Jones, M. R. (1990). Musical events and models of musical time. In A. Block (Ed.),Cognitive models of psychological time (pp. 207–240). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Jones, M. R., &Boltz, M. (1989). Dynamic attending and responses to time.Psychological Review,96, 459–491.
Jones, M. R., Boltz, M., &Kidd, G. (1982). Controlled attending as a function of melodic and temporal context.Perception & Psychophysics,32, 211–218.
Jones, M. R., Summerell, L., &Marshburn, E. (1987). Recognizing melodies: A dynamic interpretation.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,39, 89–121.
Martin, J. G. (1972). Rhythmic (hierarchical) versus serial structure in speech and other behavior.Psychological Review,79, 487–509.
Monahan, C., &Carterette, E. C. (1985). Pitch and duration as determinants of musical space.Music Perception,3, 1–32.
Monahan, C. B., Kendall, R. A., &Carterette, E. C. (1987). The effect of melodic and temporal contour on recognition memory for pitch change.Perception & Psychophysics,41, 576–600.
Palmer, C., &Krumhansl, C. L. (l987a). Independent temporal and pitch structures in determination of musical phrases.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,13, 116–126.
Palmer, C., &Krumhansl, C. L. (1987b). Pitch and temporal contributions to musical phrase perception: Effects of harmony, performance timing, and familiarity.Perception & Psychophysics,41, 505–518.
Pollack, I., Norman, D. A., &Galanter, E. (1964). An efficient non-parametric analysis of recognition memory.Psychonomic Science,1, 327–328.
Povel, D.-J., &Essens, P. (1985). Perception of temporal patterns.Music Perception,2, 411–440.
Povel, D.-J., &Okkerman, H. (1981). Accents in equitone sequences.Perception & Psychophysics,30, 565–572.
Thomassen, J. M. (1982). Melodic accent: Experiments and a tentative model.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,71, 1596–1605.
Wallace, W. T., & Rubin, D. C. (in press). Characteristics and constraints in ballads and their effects on memory.Discourse Processes.
Watkins, A. J. (1985). Scale, key, and contour in the discrimination of tuned and mistuned approximations to melody.Perception & Psychophysics,37, 275–285.
Yeston, M. (1976).The stratification of musical rhythm. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by Grant BNS-820481 1 from the National Science Foundation awarded to Man Riess Jones.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jones, M.R., Ralston, J.T. Some influences of accent structure on melody recognition. Memory & Cognition 19, 8–20 (1991). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198492
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198492