Abstract
The effects on recognition of changes in environmental context between learning and test are examined. A context effect occurs when memory tests that take place in an environmental context that is different from the learning context produce consistent differences in performance. A formal model of context-dependent recognition within a global activation framework is presented. The model generates the predictions that (1) context effects will be present when items are tested in a new context that was not seen during learning and (2) context effects will be absent or very small when items are tested in a context that was experienced during learning but that differs from the context in which the test item was learned. Both predictions were verified in an experiment that varied the nature of the different-context test within subjects. Implications for research concerned with context-dependent recognition are discussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bjork, R. A., Richardson-Klavehn, A. (1989). On the puzzling relationship between environmental context and human memory. In C. Izawa (Ed.),Current issues in cognitive processes: The Tulane Floweree Symposium on Cognition (pp. 313–344). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Dulsky, S. G. (1935). The effect of a change in background on recall and relearning.Journal of Experimental Psychology,18, 725–740.
Eich, E. (1985). Context, memory, and integrated item/context imagery.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,11, 764–770.
Eich, J. M. (1982). A composite holographic associative recall model.Psychological Review,89, 627–661.
Eich, J. M. (1985). Levels of processing, encoding specificity, elaboration, and CHARM.Psychological Review,92, 1–38.
Emmerson, P. G. (1986). Effects of environmental context on recognition memory in an unusual environment.Perceptual & Motor Skills,63, 1047–1050.
Fernandez, A., &Glenberg, A. M. (1985). Changing environmental context does not reliably affect memory.Memory & Cognition,13, 333–345.
Francis, W. N., &Kučera, H. (1982).Frequency analysis of English usage: Lexicon and grammar. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Friedman, H. (1968). Magnitude of experimental effect and a table for its rapid estimation.Psychological Bulletin,70, 245–251.
Geiselman, R. E., &Bjork, R. A. (1980). Primary versus secondary rehearsal in imagined voices: Differential effects on recognition.Cognitive Psychology,12, 188–205.
Geiselman, R. E., &Glenny, J. (1977). Effects of imagining speakers’ voices on the retention of words presented visually.Memory & Cognition,5, 499–504.
Gillund, G., &Shiffrin, R. M. (1984). A retrieval model for both recognition and recall.Psychological Review,91, 1–67.
Godden, D. R., &Baddeley, A. D. (1980). When does context influence recognition memory?British Journal of Psychology,71, 99–104.
Hintzman, D. L. (1986). “Schema abstraction” in a multiple-trace memory model.Psychological Review,93, 411–428.
Hintzman, D. L. (1988). Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model.Psychological Review,95, 528–551.
Hintzman, D. L. (1990). Human learning and memory: Connections and dissociations.Annual Review of Psychology,41, 109–139.
Humphreys, M. S., Bain, J. D., &Pike, R. (1989). Different ways to cue a coherent memory system: A theory for episodic, semantic and procedural tasks.Psychological Review,96, 208–233.
Humphreys, M. S., Pike, R., Bain, J. D., &Tehan, G. (1988). Using multilist designs to test for contextual reinstatement effects in recognition.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,26, 200–202.
Jacoby, L. L. (1983). Perceptual enhancement: Persistent effects of experience.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning, Memory, & Cognition,9, 21–38.
Mensink, G.-J. [M.], &Raaijmakers, J. G. W. (1988). A model for interference and forgetting.Psychological Review,95, 434–455.
Mensink, G.-J. M., &Raaijmakers, J. G. W. (1989). A model for contextual fluctuation.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,33, 172–186.
Murdock, B. B. (1982). A theory for the storage and retrieval of item and associative information.Psychological Review,89, 609–626.
Murdock, B. B. (1989). Learning in a distributed memory model. In C. Izawa (Ed.),Current issues in cognitive processes: The Tulane Floweree Symposium on Cognition (pp. 69–106). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Murnane, K., &Phelps, M. P. (1993). A global activation approach to the effect of changes in environmental context on recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 882–894.
Peterson, L. R., &Peterson, M. J. (1959). Short-term retention of individual verbal items.Journal of Experimental Psychology,58, 193–198.
Raaijmakers, J. G. [W.], &Shiffrin, R. M. (1981). Search of associative memory.Psychological Review,88, 93–134.
Raaijmakers, J. G. [W.], &Shiffrin, R. M. (1992). Models for recall and recognition.Annual Review of Psychology,43, 205–234.
Smith, S. M. (1979). Remembering in and out of context.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,5, 460–471.
Smith, S. M. (1982). Enhancement of recall using multiple environmental contexts during learning.Memory & Cognition,10, 405–412.
Smith, S. M. (1985). Environmental context and recognition memory reconsidered.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,23, 173–176.
Smith, S. M. (1986). Environmental context-dependent recognition memory using a short-term memory task for input.Memory & Cognition,14, 347–354.
Smith, S. M. (1988). Environmental context-dependent memory. In G. M. Davies & D. M. Thompson (Eds.),Memory in context: Context in memory (pp. 13–34). New York: Wiley.
Smith, S. M. (in press). Theoretical principles of context-dependent memory. In P. Morris & M. Gruneberg (Eds.),Aspects of memory: Theoretical aspects (2nd ed.).
Smith, S. M., Glenberg, A. [M.], &Bjork, R. A. (1978). Environmental context and human memory.Memory & Cognition,6, 342–353.
Smith, S. M., & Vela, E. (1986, November).Outshining: The relative effectiveness of cues. Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, New Orleans.
Smith, S. M., &Vela, E. (1992). Environmental context-dependent eyewitness recognition.Applied Cognitive Psychology,6, 125–139.
Tulving, E. (1983).Elements of episodic memory. New York: Oxford University Press.
Tulving, E., &Thompson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory.Psychological Review,80, 352–373.
Vela, E. (1989, November).Environmental context dependent memory: A meta-analytic review. Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Atlanta.
Weiss, W., &Margolius, G. (1954). The effect of context stimuli on learning and retention.Journal of Experimental Psychology,48, 318–322.
Wright, D. L., &Shea, C. H. (1991). Contextual dependencies in motor skills.Memory & Cognition,19, 361–370.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Preparation of this article was supported by NSF Grant SBR-9319549, an Alumni Faculty Research Fellowship, and a Research Initiation Grant from Pennsylvania State University to the first author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Murnane, K., Phelps, M.P. When does a different environmental context make a difference in recognition? A global activation model. Memory & Cognition 22, 584–590 (1994). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198397
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198397