Abstract
Subjects were given a passage to read for meaning while at the same time checking off any misspellings. Critical words in the text were mutilated by either deleting or substituting letters. In half of these mutilations, an ascender in the word was removed, resulting in a large change in the overall shape of the word. In the first experiment, it was found that mutilations involving the substitution of letters were more likely to be noticed than mutilations involving deletions. For both types of mutilation, alterations to word shape were more often noticed than alterations that preserved word shape. When word shape cues were eliminated by using mixed-case stimuli in Experiment 2, the shape effect was abolished. The results are interpreted as evidence for a supraletter feature corresponding to word shape.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, M. J. Models of word recognition.Cognitive Psychology, 1979,11, 133–176.
Baron, J. The word superiority effect: Perceptual learning from reading. In W. K. Estes (Ed.),Handbook of learning and cognitive processes (Vol. 6).Linguistic functions in cognitive theory. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1978.
Bouma, H. Visual recognition of isolated lower case letters.Vision Research, 1971,11, 459–474.
Bouwhuis, D., &Bouma, H. Visual recognition of three letter words as derived from the recognition of the constituent letters.Perception & Psychophysics, 1979,25, 12–224.
Broadbent, D. E. The hidden preattentive process.American Psychologist, 1977,32, 109–118
Broadbent, D. E., &Broadbent, M. H. P. General shape and local detail in word perception. In S. Dornic (Ed.),Attention and performance VI. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1977.
Broadbent, D. E., &Broadbent, M. H. P. Priming and the passive/active model of word recognition. In R. S. Nickerson (Ed.),Attention and performance VIII. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1980.
Bruder, G. A. Role of visual similarity in the word-superiority effects obtained with the simultaneous matching task.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1978,4, 88–100.
Cattell, J. The time taken up by cerebral operations.Mind, 1886,11, 220–242.
Coffin, S. Spectral frequency analysis of block letters does not predict experimental confusions.Perception & Psychophysics, 1978,23, 69–74.
Cohen, G. Reading and searching for spelling errors. In U. Frith (ed.),Cognitive processes in spelling. London: Academic Press, 1980.
Corcoran, D. W. J. An acoustic factor in letter cancellation.Nature, 1966,210, 658.
Ehrlich, S., &Rayner, K. Contextual effects on word perception and eye movements during reading.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1981,20, 641–655.
Eichelman, W. H. Familiarity effects in the simultaneous matching task.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1970,86, 275–282.
Fisher, D. F. Reading and visual search.Memory &’Cognition, 1975,3, 188–196.
Frith, U. Reading by eye and writing by ear. In P. A. Kolers, M. Wrolstead, & H. Bouma (Eds.),Processing of visible language (Vol. 1). New York: Plenum, 1979.
Haber, R. N., &Schindler, R. M. Error in proofreading: Evidence for syntactic control of letter processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1981,7, 573–579.
Healy, A. F. Detection errors on the word the: Evidence for reading units larger than letters.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1976,2, 235–242.
Healy, A. F. Proofreading errors on the word the: New evidence on reading units.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1980,6, 45–47.
Healy, A. F. The effects of visual similarity on proofreading for misspellings.Memory & Cognition, 1981,9, 453–460.
Henderson, L., &Chard, J. The readers implicit knowledge of orthographic structure. In U. Frith (Ed.),Cognitive processes in spelling. London: Academic Press, 1980.
Johnston, J. C., &McClelland, J. L. Visual factors in word perception.Perception & Psychophysics, 1973,14, 365–370.
Johnston, J. C., &McClelland, J. L. Experimental tears of a hierarchical model of word identification.Journal of Verbal Learning and VerbaI Behavior, 1980,19, 503–524.
Kuĉera, H., &Francis, W. N.Computational analysis of presentday American English. Providence, R.I: Brown University Press, 1967.
Massaro, D. M. Perception of letters words and nonwords.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973,100, 349–353.
Massaro, D. M.Experimental psychology and information processing. New York: Rand McNally, 1975.
Mayzner, M. S., &Tresselt, M. E. Tables of single letter and digram counts for various word-length and letter position combinations.Psychonomic Monograph Supplements, 1965,1, 13–32.
Mayzner, M. S., Tresselt, M. E., &Wolin, B. R. Tables of trigram frequency counts for various word-length and letter position combinations.Psychonomic Monograph Supplements, 1965,1, 33–78.
McClelland, J. L. Preliminary letter identification in the perception of words and nonwords.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1976,2, 80–91.
McClelland, J. L. Letter and configuration information in word identification.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 1977,16, 137–150.
McClelland, J. L., &Rumelhart, D. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings.Psychological Review, 1981,88, 357–407.
MorTon, J. A functional model for memory. In D. A. Norman (ed.),Models for human memory. New York: Academic Press, 1970.
Navon, D. Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception.Cognitive Psychology, 1977,9, 353–383.
Rayner, K. The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading.Cognitive Psychology, 1975,7, 65–81.
Rayner, K. Foveal and parafoveal cues in reading. In J. Requin (ed.),Attention and performance VII. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1978.
Rayner, K., McConkie, G., &Ehrlich, S. Eye movements and integrating information across fixations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1980,4, 529–544.
Reicher, G. M. Perceptual recognition as a function of meaningfulness of stimulus material.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969,81, 275–280.
Smith, F. Familiarity of configuration vs discriminability of features in the visual identification of words.Psychonomic Science, 1969,14, 261.
Smith, P. T., &Groat, A. Spelling patterns, letter cancellation and the processing of text. In P. A. Kolers, M. Wrolstead, & H. Bouma (Eds.),Processing of visible language (Vol. 1). New York: Plenum, 1979.
Tinker, M. A.Bases for effective reading. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1965.
Winer, B. J.Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1971.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The first author’s research is supported by a grant from the Medical Research Council.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Monk, A.F., Hulme, C. Errors in proofreading: Evidence for the use of word shape in word recognition. Memory & Cognition 11, 16–23 (1983). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197657
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197657