Abstract
Five experiments investigated the effects of semantically interpreting faces on their recognition. Experiment 1 demonstrated that faces could meaningfully be related to occupational categories. In Experiments 2–5, each of a set of faces was presented with either the label of a congruent occupational category or a noncongruent label. Presenting a face with a congruent occupational label was found to enhance recognition that the face had previously been seen (Experiments 2–4), but congruent labeling also impaired the detection of distractor faces that matched previously seen faces’ categories (Experiments 3 and 4). In a forced-choice recognition test, in which distractors were highly similar to originally seen faces, congruent occupational labeling failed to increase recognition of previously seen faces (Experiment 5). These results indicate that interpreting faces, with respect to stereotyped categories, ratherthan improving a physical codein memory, led to theformation of a semantic code, which increased recognition of old items at the expense of the detection of new items. Another general finding was that faces that were rated more stereotypical were more recognizable, regardless of the accompanying label.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baddeley, A. Applied cognitive and cognitive applied psychology: The case of face recognition. In L.-G. Nilsson (Ed.),Perspectives on memory research. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1979.
Bartlett, J. C., Till, R. E., &Levy, J. C. Retrieval characteristics of complex pictures: Effects of verbal encoding.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1980,19, 430–449.
Bower, G. H., &Karlin, M. B. Depth of processing pictures of faces and recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1974,103, 751–757.
Craik, F. I. M., &Lockhart, R. S. Levels of processing: A framework for memory research.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1972,11, 671–684.
Dictionary of Occupational Titles (4th ed.). Washington, D.C: U.S. Department of Labor, 1977.
Daniel, T. C. Nature of the effect of verbal labels on recognition memory for form.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1972,96, 152–157.
Dooling, D. J., &Lachman, R. Effects of comprehension on retention of prose.Journal of ExperimentalPsychology, 1971,88, 216–222.
Franks, J. J., &Bransford, J. D. Abstraction of visual patterns.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971,90, 65–74.
Friedman, A. Framing pictures: The role of knowledge in automatized encoding and memory for gist.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1979,108, 316–355.
Goodman, G. S. Picture memory: How the action schema affects retention.Cognitive Psychology, 1980,12, 473–495.
Hochhaus, L. A table for the calculation of d’ and β.Psycho-logical Bulletin, 1972,77, 375–376.
Klatzky, R. L. Visual memory: Definitions and functions. In R. Wyer, T. Srull, & J. Hartwick (Eds.),Handbook of social cognition. Hilisdale, N.J: Erlbaum, in press.
Klatzky, R. L., Mantin, G. L., & Kane, R. A. Influence of social-category activation on processing of visual information.Social Cognition, in press.
Klatzky, R. L., &Stoy, A. M. Semantic information and visual information processing. In J. W. Cotton & R. L. Klatzky (Eds.),Semantic factors in cognition. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1978.
Light, L. L., Kayra-Stuart, F., &Hollander, S. Recognition memory for typical and unusual faces.Journal of Experimental F’sychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1979,5, 212–228.
Litterer, O. Stereotypes.Journal of Social Psychology, 1933,4, 59–68.
Malpass, R. S., Laviguer, H., &Weldon, D. E. Verbal and visual training in face recognition.Perception & Psychophysics, 1973,14, 285–292.
Mandler, J. M., &Ritchey, G. H. Long-term memory for pictures.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1977,3, 386–396.
Nelson, D. L., Reed, V. S., &Walling, J. R. Pictorial superiority effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1976,2, 523–538.
Paivio, A.Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, 1971.
Patterson, K. E., &Baddeley, A. D. When face recognition fails.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1977,3, 406–417.
Rafnel, K. J., &Klatzky, R. L. Meaningful-interpretation effects on codes of nonsense pictures.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1978,4, 631–646.
Sergent, J., &Bindra, D. Differential hemispheric processing of faces: Methodological considerations and reinterpretation.Psychological Bulletin, 1981,89, 541–554.
Shoemaker, D., South, D., &Lowe, J. Facial stereotypes of deviants and judgments of guilt or innocence.Social Forces, 1973,51, 427–433.
Winograd, E. Elaboration and distinctiveness in memory for faces.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1981,7, 181–190.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by Grant MH 25090 from the National Institute of Mental Health to the first author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Klatzky, R.L., Martin, G.L. & Kane, R.A. Semantic interpretation effects on memory for faces. Memory & Cognition 10, 195–206 (1982). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197630
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197630