Abstract
This paper describes research whose goal is to determine the implications of verba] classificatory, judgments for recognition memory and recall. Toward this end, St were required to answer 100 queries of attribution and superordination ds a TWINGE sudden? Is SPINACH ecstatic? Is a CORKSCREW an opener? Is a DUNGEON a scholar? before being tested unexpectedly on their ability to remember either the uppercase “keywords” or the lowercase “descriptors.” Lexical memory did not depend on whether a word had been part of an attributive or a superordinate query. But words from “incongruous” queries almost invariably were more poorly remembered-under conditions of free recall, cued recall, and recognition memory-than words from “congruous” queries. Congruous cues, but not incongruous ones, greatly facilitated recall, with keywords being more effective cues than descriptors. Recognition memory of keywords was uniformly superior to that of descriptors. It is argued that the large and pervasive memorial advantages of congruity arise because a congruous query, unlike an incongruous one, fosters a relational encoding of keyword and descriptor.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Begg, I. Recall of meaningful phrases. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 1972, 11,431–439.
Brown, R., & McNeill, D. The “tip of the tongue” phenomenon. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 1966, 5, 325–337.
Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 1972, 11,671–684.
Fillenbaum, S. Memory for gist: Some relevant variables Language & Speech. 1966, 9, 217–227.
Freedman, J. L., & Loftus, E. F. Retrieval of words from long-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 197l, 10, 107–115.
Horowitz, L. M., & Manelis, L. Towards a theory of redintegrative memory: Adjective-noun phrases. In G. H. Bower and J. T. Spence (Eds.),The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory. Vol. 5. New York: Academic Press. 1972.
Horowitz, L. M., & Prytulak, L. S. Redintegrative memory. Psychological Review, 1969, 76, 519–531.
Hyde, T. S., & Jenkins, J. J. Differential effects of incidental tasks on the organization of recall of a list of highly associated words. Journal of l Experimental Psychology. 1969, 82. 472–481.
Katz, J., & Fodor, J. The structure of a semantic theory. Language. 1963, 39, 170–210.
Kintsch, W. Abstract nouns: Imagery value versus lexical complexity. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior. 1972, 11, 59–65.
Lockhart, R. S, Retrieval asymmetry in the recall of adjectives and nouns. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969, 79, 12–17.
McCormack, P. D., & Swenson, A. L. Recognition memory for common and rare words. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1972, 95, 72–77.
Meyer, D. E. On the representation and retrieval of stored semantic information. Cognitive Psychology. 1970, 1, 242–299.
Paivio, A. Mental imagery in associative learning. Psychological Review, 1969, 76,241–263.
Schulman, A. I. Word length and rarity in recognition memory. Psychonomic Science, 1967, 9. 211–212.
Schulman, A. I. Recognition memory for targets from a scanned word list. British Journal of Psychology. 1971, 62, 335–346.
Schulman. A. I. The declining course of recognition memory. Memory & Cognition. in press.
Shepard, R. N. Recognition memory for words, sentences, and pictures. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 1967. 6, 156–163.
Thorndike, E. L., & Lorge, I.The teacher’s word book of 30,000 words. New York: Columbia University Press. 1944.
Tulving, E., & Osler, S. Effectiveness of retrieval cues in memory for words. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1968, 77, 593–601.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schulman, A.I. Memory for words recently classified. Memory & Cognition 2, 47–52 (1974). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197491
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197491