Abstract
In this article, we report an experiment that provides further evidence concerning the differences between explicit and implicit measures of memory. The effects of age and divided attention on the implicit conceptual test of category exemplar generation (CEG) were compared with their effects on the explicit test of cued recall, where the category names served as cues in both tasks. Four age groups (20–35, 40–55, 60–75, and 76–90) were compared. Half of the subjects were also required to carry out a secondary letter-detection task during the learning phase. Cued recall performance was significantly impaired by increased age and imposition of the secondary task. In contrast, the CEG task was unaffected by these two factors. These results suggest that implicit conceptual tasks and explicit memory tasks are mediated by different processes. This conclusion opposes those of previous studies that showed that experimental manipulations (level of processing, generation, organization) influenced these two kinds of memory tests in a similar way.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cabeza, R., &Ohta, N. (1993). Dissociating conceptual priming, perceptual priming and explicit memory.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,5, 35–53.
Craik, F. I. M. (1977). Age differences in human memory. In J. E. Birren & K. W. Schaie (Eds.),Handbook of the psychology of aging (pp. 384–420). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Craik, F. I. M. (1986). A functional account of age differences in memory. In F. Klix & H. Hagendorf (Eds.),Human memory and cognitive capabilities (pp. 409–422). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Craik, F. I. M., &Byrd, M. (1982). Aging and cognitive deficits: The role of attentional resources. In F. I. M. Craik & S. Trehub (Eds.),Aging and cognitive processes (pp. 191–211). New York: Plenum.
Eysenck, M. W. (1974). Age differences in incidental learning.Developmental Psychology,10, 936–941.
Gardner, H., Boller, F., Moreines, J., &Butters, N. (1973). Retrieving information from Korsakoff patients: Effects of categorical cues and reference to the task.Cortex,9, 165–175.
Graf, P., &Mandler, G. (1984). Activation makes words more accessible, but not necessarily more retrievable.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,23, 553–568.
Graf, P., Shimamura, A. P., &Squire, L. R. (1985). Priming across modalities and across category levels: Extending the domain of preserved function in amnesia.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,11, 385–395.
Grober, E., Gitlin, H. L., Bang, S., &Buschke, M. (1992). Implicit and explicit memory in young, old and demented adults.Journal of Clinical & Experimental Neuropsychology,14, 298–316.
Hamann, S. B. (1990). Level-of-processing effects in conceptually driven implicit tasks.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 970–977.
Hasher, L., &Zacks, R.T. (1979). Automatic and effortful processes in memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,108, 356–388.
Jacoby, L. L., &Dallas, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,110, 306–340.
Jacoby, L. L., &Witherspoon, D. (1982). Remembering without awareness.Canadian Journal of Psychology,36, 300–324.
Java, R. I., &Gardiner, J. M. (1991). Priming and aging: Further evidence of preserved memory function.American Journal of Psychology,104, 89–100.
Light, L. L., &Albertson, S. A. (1989). Direct and indirect tests of memory for category exemplars in young and older adults.Psychology & Aging,4, 487–492.
Light, L. L., &La Voie, D. (1993). Direct and indirect measures of memory in old age. In P. Graf & M. E. J. Masson (Eds.),Implicit memory: New directions in cognition, development and neuropsychology (pp. 207–230). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Light, L. L., &Singh, A. (1987). Implicit and explicit memory in young and older adults.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 531–541.
Light, L. L., Singh, A., &Capps, J. L. (1986). Dissociation of memory and awareness in young and older adults.Journal of Clinical & Experimental Neuropsychology,8, 62–74.
Mitchell, D. B. (1989). How many memory systems? Evidence from aging.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 31–49.
Mitchell, D. B., Brown, A. S., &Murphy, D. R. (1990). Dissociations between procedural and episodic memory: Effects of time and aging.Psychology & Aging,5, 264–276.
Moscovitch, M. (1982). A neuropsychological approach to perception and memory in normal and pathological aging. In F. I. M. Craik & S. Trehub (Eds.),Aging and cognitive processes (pp. 55–76). New York: Plenum.
Moscovitch, M., Winocur, G., &McLachlan, D. (1986). Memory as assessed by recognition and reading time in normal and memoryimpaired people with Alzheimer’s disease and other neurological disorders.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,115, 331–347.
Parkin, A. J., Reid, T. K., &Russo, R. (1990). On the differential nature of implicit and explicit memory.Memory & Cognition,18, 507–514.
Parkin, A. J., &Russo, R. (1990). Implicit and explicit memory and the automatic/effortful distinction.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,2, 71–80.
Rappold, V. A., &Hashtroudi, S. (1991). Does organization improve priming?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 103–114.
Richardson-Klavehn, A., &Bjork, R. A. (1988). Measures of memory.Annual Review of Psychology,39, 475–543.
Roediger, H. L., III &Blaxton, T. A. (1987). Effects of varying modality, surface features, and retention interval on priming in word fragment completion.Memory & Cognition,15, 379–388.
Roediger, H. L., III,Weldon, M. S., &Challis, B. H. (1989). Explaining dissociations between implicit and explicit measures of retention: A processing account. In H. L. Roediger III & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.),Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in honor of Endel Tulving (pp. 3–36). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Scarborough, D. L., Cortese, C., &Scarborough, H. S. (1977). Frequency and repetition effects in lexical memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,3, 1–17.
Schacter, D. L. (1985). Priming of old and new knowledge in amnesic patients and normal subjects. In D. S. Olton, E. Gamzu, & S. Corkin (Eds.),Memory dysfunctions: An integration of animal and human research from preclinical and clinical perspectives (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 444, pp. 41–53). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
Schacter, D. L. (1987). Implicit memory: History and current status.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 501–518.
Shimamura, A. P., &Squire, L. R. (1984). Paired-associate learning and priming effects in amnesia: A neuropsychological study.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,113, 556–570.
Smith, M. E., &Oscar-Berman, M. (1990). Repetition priming of words and pseudowords in divided attention and in amnesia.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 1033–1042.
Srinivas, K., &Roediger, H. L., III (1990). Classifying implicit memory tests: Category association and anagram solution.Journal of Memory & Language,29, 389–412.
Tourette, G. (1979).Tables catégorielles: Normes de production de 30 catégories sémantiques. Poitiers, France: Laboratoire de Psychologie de l’Université de Poitiers.
Tulving, E., Schacter, D. L., &Stark, H. A. (1982). Priming effects in word-fragment completion are independent of recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,8, 336–342.
Warrington, E. K., &Weiskrantz, L. (1970). Amnesia: Consolidation or retrieval?Nature,228, 628–630.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Isingrini, M., Vazou, F. & Leroy, P. Dissociation of implicit and explicit memory tests: Effect of age and divided attention on category exemplar generation and cued recall. Memory & Cognition 23, 462–467 (1995). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197247
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197247