Abstract
Digitized photographs of snowflakes were presented for a recognition test after retention intervals of varying durations. While overall accuracy and discrimination remained constant, as the retention interval increased, primacy increased from chance to reliably better than chance while recency decreased to chance levels. A variation of Murdock’s (1960) distinctiveness model accounted for the changing primacy and recency effects observed in both between- and within-subjects designs. The generality of the model was examined in two different paradigms: lexical access during sentence processing, and free recall in the continual distractor paradigm. In both cases, the model made accurate qualitative predictions for both latency and accuracy measures.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baddeley, A. D. (1992). Working memory.Science,255, 556–559.
Bentley, W. A., &Humphreys, W. J. (1962).Snow crystals. New York: Dover.
Bjork, R. A., &Bjork, E. L. (1992). A new theory of disuse and old theory of stimulus fluctuation. In A. F. Healy, S. M. Kosslyn, & R. M. Shiffrin (Eds.),From learning processes to cognitive processes: Essays in honor of William K. Estes (Vol. 2, pp. 35–67). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Broadbent, D. (1987). Simple models for experimentable situations. In P. E. Morris (Ed.),Modeling cognition. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Burnham, W. H. (1888). Memory, historically and experimentally considered.American Journal of Psychology,2, 39–90, 255–270, 431–464, and 566–622.
Calkins, M. W. (1894). Association.Psychological Review,1, 476–483.
Cornell, H. H., &Bergstrom, L. I. (1983). serial position effects in infants’ recognition memory.Memory & Cognition,11, 494–499.
Craik, F. I. M. (1970). The fate of primary memory items in free recall.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,9, 143–148.
Crowder, R. G. (1976).Principles of learning and memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Crowder, R. G. (1982). General forgetting theory and the locus of amnesia. In L. S. Cermak (Ed.),Human memory and amnesia (pp. 33–41). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Crowder, R. G., &Neath, I. (1991). The microscope metaphor in human memory. In W. E. Hockley & S. Lewandowsky (Eds.),Relating theory and data: Essays on human memory in honor of Bennet B. Murdock, Jr. (pp. 111–125). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Donaldson, W. (1992). Measuring recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,121, 275–278.
Gardiner, J. M., &Hampton, J. A. (1988). Item-specific processing and the generation effect: Support for a distinctiveness account.American Journal of Psychology,101, 495–504.
Gernsbacher, M. A., Hargreaves, D. J., &Beeman, M. (1989). Building and accessing clausal representations: The advantage of first mention versus the advantage of clause recency.Journal of Memory & Language,28, 735–755.
Glenberg, A. M., &Swanson, N. C. (1986). A temporal distinctiveness theory of recency and modality effects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,12, 3–24.
Goldstein, A. G., &Chance, J. E. (1970). Visual recognition memory for complex configurations.Perception & Psychophysics,9, 237–241.
Greene, R. L. (1986). Sources of recency effects in free recall.Psychological Bulletin,99, 221–228.
Helson, H. (1964).Adaptation-level theory. New York: Harper & Row.
Hintzman, D. L. (1991). Why are formal models useful in psychology? In W. E. Hockley & S. Lewandowsky (Eds.),Relating theory and data: Essays on human memory in honor of Bennet B. Murdock, Jr. (pp. 39–56). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Johnson, G. J. (1991). A distinctiveness model of serial learning.Psychological Review,98, 204–217.
Koffka, K. (1935).Principles of Gestalt psychology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Madigan, S. A., &McCabe, L. (1971). Perfect recall and total forgetting: A problem for models of short-term memory.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,10, 101–106.
McDaniel, M. A., &Einstein, G. O. (1986). Bizarre imagery as an effective memory aid: The importance of distinctiveness.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,12, 54–65.
Murdock, B. B., Jr. (1960). The distinctiveness of stimuli.Psychological Review,67, 16–31.
Murdock, B. B., Jr. (1974).Human memory: Theory and data. Potomac, MD: Erlbaum.
Murdock, B. B., Jr. (1985). An analysis of the strength-latency relationship.Memory & Cognition,13, 511–521.
Neath, I. (in press). Contextual and distinctive processes and the serial position function.Journal of Memory and Language.
Neath, I., &Crowder, R. G. (1990). Schedules of presentation and temporal distinctiveness in human memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 316–327.
Neath, I., & Crowder, R. G. (1993).Distinctiveness and very short-term recency effects. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Pollack, I., &Norman, D. A. (1964). A non-parametric analysis of recognition experiments.Psychonomic Science,1, 125–126.
Potter, M. C., &Levy, E. I. (1969). Recognition memory for a rapid sequence of pictures.Journal of Experimental Psychology,81, 10–15.
Schmidt, S. R. (1991). Can we have a distinctive theory of memory?Memory & Cognition,19, 523–542.
Snodgrass, J. G., Volvovitz, R., &Walfish, E. R. (1972). Recognition memory for words, pictures, and words + pictures.Psychonomic Science,27, 345–347.
Von Restorff, H. (1933). Analyse von Vorgangen im Spurenfeld: I. Über die Wirkung von Bereichsbildung im Spurenfeld.Psychologische Forschung,18, 299–342.
Wright, A. A., Santiago, H. C., Sands, S. F., Kendrick, D. F., &Cook, R. G. (1985). Memory processing of serial lists by pigeons, monkeys, and people.Science,229, 287–289.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Neath, I. Distinctiveness and serial position effects in recognition. Memory & Cognition 21, 689–698 (1993). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197199
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197199