Abstract
The framework of dimensional interaction was used to test the hypothesis that the Stroop effect is partially rooted in mismatches in baseline discriminability, with stimulus differences along the word dimension typically exceeding stimulus differences along the color dimension. Subjects made speeded classifications, with either keypresses or vocalizations, of either words or colors. Stroop congruity and Garner interference were measured under conditions in which discriminabilities were (1) matched (Experiments1 and 4), (2) mismatched in favor of colors (Experiment 2), or (3) mismatched in favor of words (Experiment3). When matched, colors and words appeared separable, with small interactive effects being reduced or eliminated through practice. When mismatched, asymmetric Stroop and Garner effects emerged, with the more discriminable dimension disrupting classification of the less discriminable dimension. Asymmetric effects were obtained in both response modes, and were not alleviated by practice. We conclude that (1) the Stroop effect is an optional effect, and (2) unequal discriminability causes a mandatory failure of selective attention.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ashby, F. G., & Maddox, W. T. (1992). A response time theory of separability and integrality in speeded classification. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Ashby, F. G., &Townsend, J. T. (1986). Varieties of perceptual independence.Psychological Review,93, 154–179.
Callaghan, T. C. (1984). Dimensional interaction of hue and brightness in preattentive field segregation.Perception & Psychophysics,36, 25–34.
Clark, H. H., &Brownell, H. H. (1976). Position, direction, and their perceptual integrality.Perception & Psychophysics,19, 328–334.
Cohen, J. D., Dunbar, K., &McClelland, J. L. (1990). On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect.Psychological Review,97, 332–361.
Dunbar, K., &Macleod, C. M. (1984). A horse race of a different color: Stroop interference patterns with transformed words.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 622–639.
Dyer, F. N. (1973). The Stroop phenomenon and its use in the study ofperceptual, cognitive, and response processes.Memory & Cognition,1, 106–120.
Dyer, F. N., &Severance, L. J. (1972). Effects of irrelevant colors on reading of color names: Acontrolled replication ofthe “reversed Stroop” effect.Psychonomic Science,28, 336–338.
Flowers, J. H., &Stoup, C. M. (1977). Selective attention between words, shapes and colors in speeded classification and vocalization tasks.Memory & Cognition,5, 299–307.
Flowers, J. H., Warner, J. L., &Polansky, M. L. (1979). Response and encoding factors in “ignoring” irrelevant information.Memory & Cognition,7, 86–94.
Fraisse, P. (1969). Why is naming longer than reading?Acta Psychologica,30, 96–103.
Garner, W. R. (1974a). Attention: The processing ofmultiple sources of information. In E. C. Carterette & M. P. Friedman (Eds.),Handbook of perception (Vol. 2, pp. 23–59). New York: Academic Press.
Garner, W. R. (1974b).The processing of information and structure. Potomac, MD: Erlbaum.
Garner, W. R. (1983). Asymmetric interactions of stimulus dimensions in perceptual information processing. In T. J. Tighe & B. E. Shepp (Eds.),Perception, cognition, and development: Interactional analyses (pp. 1–37). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Garner, W. R., &Felfoldy, G. L. (1970). Integrality of stimulus dimensions in various types of information processing.Cognitive Psychology,1, 225–241.
Glaser, M. O., &Glaser, W. R. (1982). Time course analysis of the Stroop phenomenon.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,8, 875–894.
Green, D. M., &Swets, J. A. (1966).Signal detection theory and psychophysics, New York: Wiley.
Gumenik, W. E., &Glass, R. (1970). Effects of reducing the readability of the words in the Stroop color-word test.Psychonomic Science,20, 247–248.
Jacoby, L. L., &Dallas, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,3, 306–340.
Jonides, J., &Yantis, S. (1988). Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention.Perception & Psychophysics,43, 346–354.
Keele, S. (1972). Attention demands of memory retrieval.Journal of Experimental Psychology,93, 245–248.
Kemler, D. G. (1983). Holistic and analytic modes in perceptual and cognitive development. In T. Tighe & B. E. Shepp (Eds.),Perception, cognition, and development:Interactional analyses (pp. 77–102). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kirsner, K., &Dunn, J. (1985). The perceptual record: A common factor in repetition priming and attribute retention. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Mann (Eds.),Attention and performance XI (pp. 547–565). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Lockhead, G. R. (1972). Processing dimensional stimuli: Anote.Psychological Review,79, 410–419.
Lockhead, G. R. (1979). Holistic versus analytic process models: A reply.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,5, 746–755.
Lockhead, G. R. (1992). Psychophysical scaling: Judgments of attributes or objects?Behaviorial & Brain Sciences,15, 543–601.
Logan, G. D. (1980). Attention and automaticity in Stroop and priming tasks: Theory and data.Cognitive Psychology,12, 523–553.
Logan, G. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization.Psychological Review,95, 492–527.
Macleod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review.Psychological Bulletin,109, 163–203.
Macleod, C. M., &Dunbar, K. (1988). Training and Stroop-like interference: Evidence for a continuum of automaticity.Journal of Experimental Psychology; Learning, Memory, & Cognition,14, 126–135.
McClain, L. (1983). Stimulus-response compatibility affects auditory Stroop interference.Perception & Psychophysics,33, 266–270.
Melara, R. D. (1989). Dimensional interaction between color and pitch.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 69–79.
Melara, R. D. (November, 1990). Mandatory processes: Consider your options. Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, New Orleans.
Melara, R. D., &Marks, L. E. (1990a). Dimensional interactions in language processing: Investigating directions and levels of crosstalk.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 539–554.
Melara, R. D., &Marks, L. E. (1990b). Perceptual primacy of dimensions: Support for a model of dimensional interaction.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 398–414.
Melara, R. D., &Marks, L. E. (1990c). Processes underlying dimensional interactions: Correspondences between linguistic and nonlinguistic dimensions.Memory & Cognition,18, 477–495.
Melara, R. D., Marks, L. E., &Lesko, K. E. (1992). Optional processes in similarity judgments.Perception & Psychophysics,51, 123- 133.
Melara, R. D., Marks, L. E., & Potts, B. (in press-a). Early-holistic processing or dimensional similarity? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance.
Melara, R. D., Marks, L. E., & Potts, B. (in press-b). The primacy of dimensions in color perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance.
Melara, R. D., &Nairne, J. S. (1991). Onthenatureofinteractions between the past and the present.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 875–894.
Morton, J., &Chambers, S. M. (1973). Selective attention to words and colours.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,25, 387–397.
Nealis, P. M. (1973). The Stroop phenomenon: Some critical tests of the response competition hypothesis.Perceptual & Motor Skills,37, 147–153.
Palef, S. R., &Olson, D. R. (1975). Spatial and verbal rivalry in a Stroop-like task.Canadian Journal of Psychology,29, 201–209.
Pomerantz, J. R. (1983). Global and local precedence: Selective attention in form and motion perception.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,112, 515–540.
Pomerantz, J. R. (1986). Visual form perception: An Overview. In E. C. Schwab & H. C. Nusbaum (Eds.),Pattern recognition by humans and machines: Visual perception (pp. 1–30). New York: Academic Press.
Pomerantz, J. R. (1991). The structure of visual configurations: Stimulus versus subject contributions. In G. R. Lockhead & J. R. Pomerantz (Eds.),The perception of structure: Essays in honor of Wendell R. Garner (pp. 195–210). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Pomerantz, J. R., Pristach, E. A., &Carson, C. E. (1989). Attention and object perception. In B. E. Shepp & S. Ballesteros (Eds.),Object perception: Structure and process (pp. 53–89). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Posner, M. I., &Snyder, C. R. R. (1975). Facilitation and inhibition in the processing of signals. In P. M. A. Rabbitt & S. Dornic (Eds.),Attention and performance V (pp. 669–682). London: Academic Press.
Pritchatt, D. (1968). An investigation into some of the underlying associative verbal processes of the Stroop colour effect.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,20, 351–359.
Proctor, R. W. (1978). Sources of color-word interference in the Stroop color-naming task.Perception & Psychophysics,23, 413–419.
Proctor, R. W., &Reeve, T. G. (1990).Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective, Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Redding, G. M., &Gerjets, D. A. (1977). Stroop effect: Interference and facilitation with verbal and manual responses.Perceptual & Motor Skills,45, 11–17.
Redding, G. M., &Tharp, D. A. (1981). Processing line location and orientation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,7, 115–129.
Reisberg, D., Baron, J., &Kemler, D. G. (1980). Overcoming Stroop interference: The effects of practice on distractor potency.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,6, 140–150.
Roe, W. T., Wilsoncroft, W. E., &Griffiths, R. S. (1980). Effects of motor and verbal practice on the Stroop task.Perceptual & Motor Skills,50, 647–650.
Schulz, T. (1979). Components ofthe reaction time Stroop-task.Psychological Research,40, 377–395.
Shepp, B. E. (1989). On perceiving objects: Holistic versus featural properties. In B. E. Shepp & S. Ballesteros (Eds.),Object perception: Structure andprocess (pp. 203–233). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Sichel, J. L., &Chandler, K. A. (1969). The color-word interference test: The effects of varied color-word combinations upon verbal response latency.Journal of Psychology,72, 219–231.
Simon, J. R., &Berbaum, K. (1990). Effect ofconflicting cues on information processing: The “Stroop effect” vs. the “Simon effect.”Acta Psychologica,73, 159–170.
Simon, J. R., &Sudalaimuthu, P. (1979). Effects of S-R mapping and response modality on performance in a Stroop task.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,5, 179–187.
Smith, G. J. W. (1970). Change in degree of interference in a Strooplike test (SWT) when the incongruent combinations are mixed with congruent ones.Psychologische Forschung,34, 95–96.
Smith, L. B., &Kemler, D. G. (1977). Developmental trends in free classification: Evidence for a new conceptualization of perceptual development.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,24, 279–298.
Smith, L. B., &Kemler, D. G. (1978). Levels of experienced dimensionality in children and adults.Cognitive Psychology,10, 502–532.
Stroof, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions.Journal of Experimental Psychology,18, 643–662.
Treisman, A. M. (1969). Strategies and models of selective attention.Psychological Review,76, 282–299.
Treisman, A. M., &Gelade, G. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention.Cognitive Psychology,12, 97–136.
Virzi, R. A., &Egeth, H. E. (1985). Toward a translational model of Stroop interference.Memory & Cognition,13, 304–319.
Walker, P., &Smith, S. (1984). Stroop interference based on the synaesthetic qualities of auditory pitch.Perception,13, 75–81.
Winer, B. J. (1971).Statistical principles in experimental design, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Wood, C. C. (1975). Auditory and phonetic levels of processing in speech perception: Neurophysiological and information-processing analyses.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,1, 3–20.
Wright, R. D. (1986). Amiga 1000 hardware timing and reaction-time key interfacing.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,18, 463–465.
Yantis, S., &Jonides, J. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 601–621.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant NS28617 to R.D.M.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Melara, R.D., Mounts, J.R.W. Selective attention to Stroop dimensions: Effects of baseline discriminability, response mode, and practice. Memory & Cognition 21, 627–645 (1993). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197195
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197195