Abstract
The recognition and classification of category members was explored, following a variable number of learning trials. In Experiment 1, subjects received 1 or 9 learning trials, followed by a recognition-then-classification test containing old, new, prototype, and foil patterns. In Experiment 2, subjects received 1, 6, or 12 trials, and made either classification or recognition judgments. In each experiment, classification accuracy for all item types was at near-chance -performance after a single trial but steadily increased with increased learning trials. On the transfer test, oldness judgments were highest for the category prototype after a single trial. However, with increased learning trials, oldness judgments increased for old instances and decreased for the category prototype and new instances. We suggest that false recognition of the category prototype, especially after a single learning trial, need not reflect an abstraction process. We discuss the possibility that an abstracted prototype may emerge with additional learning as an unfamiliar, ideal point.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barresi, J., Robbins, D., &Shain, K. (1975). Role of distinctive features in the abstraction of related concepts.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,1, 360–368.
Breen, T. J., &Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1986). Classification of empirically derived prototypes as a function of category experience.Memory & Cognition,14, 313–320.
Busemeyer, J. R., Dewey, G. I., &Medin, D. L. (1984). Evaluation of exemplar-based generalization and the abstraction of categorical information.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,10, 638–648.
Estes, W. K. (1986). Memory storage and retrieval processes in category learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,115, 155–174.
Franks, J. J., &Bransford, J. D. (1971). Abstraction of visual patterns.Journal of Experimental Psychology,90, 65–74.
Hayes-Roth, B., &Hayes-Roth, F. (1977). Concept learning and the recognition and classification of exemplars.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,16, 321–338.
Hintzman, D. L. (1986). “Schema Abstraction” in a multiple-trace memory model.Psychological Review,93, 411–428.
Homa, D. (1978). Abstraction of ill-defined form.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,4, 407–416.
Homa, D. (1984). On the nature of categories. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 18, pp. 49–94). New York: Academic Press.
Homa, D., Cposs, J., Cornell, D., Goldman, D., &Shwartz, S. (1973). Prototype abstraction and classification of new instances as a function of number of instances defining the prototype.Journal of Experimental Psychology,101, 116–122.
Homa, D., &Cultice, J. (1984). Role of feedback, category size, and stimulus distortion on the acquisition and utilization of ill-defined categories.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,10, 83–94.
Homa, D., Dunbar, S., &Nohre, L. (1991). Instance frequency, categorization, and the modulating effect of experience.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 444–458.
Homa, D., Rhoads, D., &Chambliss, D. (1979). The evolution of conceptual structure.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,5, 11–23.
Homa, D., & Smith, C. (1992).When is the prototype recognized as old? Unpublished manuscript.
Homa, D., &Vosburgh, R. (1976). Category breadth and the abstraction of categorical information.Journal of Experimental Psychology,2, 322–330.
Johnson, M. K., Raye, C. L., Wang, A. Y., &Taylor, T. H. (1979). Fact and fantasy: The roles of accuracy and variability in confusing imaginations with perceptual experiences.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,5, 229–240.
Johnson, M. K., &Suengas, A. G. (1989). Reality monitoring judgments of other people’s memories.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,27, 107–110.
Knapp, A., &Anderson, J. A. (1984). Theory of categorization based on distributed memory storage.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,10, 616–637.
McClelland, J. L.,&Rumelhart, D. E. (1986). A distributed model of human learning and memory. In J. L. McClelland & D. E. Rumelhart (Eds.),Parallel distributed processing (Vol. 2, pp. 170–215). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Medin, D. L., &Schaffer, M. M. (1978). Context theory of lassification learning.Psychological Review,85, 207–238.
Metcalfe, J., &Fisher, R. P. (1986). The relation between recognition memory and classification learning.Memory & Cognition,14, 164–173.
Neisser, U. (1967).Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Neumann, P. G. (1977). Visual prototype formation with discontinuous representation of dimensions of variability.Memory & Cognition,5, 187–197.
Nosofsky, R. M. (1988). Exemplar-based accounts of relations between classification, recognition, and typicality.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,14, 700–708.
Nosofsky, R. M. (1991). Tests of an exemplar model for relating perceptual classification and recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,17, 3–27.
Posner, M. I., &Keele, S. W. (1968). On the genesis of abstract ideas.Journal of Experimental Psychology,77, 353–363.
Shepard, R. N. (1987). Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science.Science,237, 1317–1323.
Solso, R. L., &McCarthy, J. E. (1981a). Prototype formation: Central tendency model vs. attribute-frequency model.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,17, 10–11.
Solso, R. L., &McCarthy, J. E. (1981b). Prototype formation of faces: A case of pseudo-memory.British Journal of Psychology,72, 499–503.
Solso, R. L., &Raynis, S. A. (1979). Prototype formation of imaged, kinesthetically and visually presented geometric forms.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,5, 701–712.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Portions of Experiments 1 and 2 were presented to the Western Psychological Association, in Reno, Nevada, April 1989.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Homa, D., Goldhardt, B., Burruel-Homa, L. et al. Influence of manipulated category knowledge on prototype classification and recognition. Memory & Cognition 21, 529–538 (1993). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197184
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197184