Abstract
The current status of the concept ofdistinctiveness as applied to memory research is discussed. In spite of the fact that distinctiveness is difficult to define, an increasing number of memory phenomena have been explained in terms of distinctiveness. These phenomena are grouped into four classes, which vary in how distinctiveness is operationalized. Distinctiveness has different effects on memory performance, depending on how it is defined, suggesting that the concept of distinctiveness has been overapplied. In addition, current theoretical explanations of the effects of distinctiveness on memory fail to specify what the different definitions of distinctiveness have in common, and fail to encompass adequately the broad range of phenomena to be explained. A limited theory of distinctiveness is proposed, in order to explain why conceptually incongruent material is remembered well.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, J. R., &Bower, G. H, (1972). Recognition and retrieval processes in free recall.Psychological Review,79, 97–123.
Atkinson, R. C, &Shiffrin, R, M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K. W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds.),The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 2, pp. 89–195). New York: Academic Press.
Baddrly, A. D. (1978). The trouble with levels: A reexamination of Craik and Lockhart’s framework for memory research.Psychological Review,85, 139–152.
Begg, I., &Snider, A. (1987). The generation effect: Evidence for generalized inhibition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition.13, 553–563.
Begg, I., Snider, A., Foley, F., &Goddard, R. (1989). The generation effect is no artifact: Generating makes words distinctive.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 977–989.
Bird, C. P. (1980). The isolation effect as a function of unique processing orientation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,6, 267–275.
Bohannon, J. N. (1988). Flashbulb memories of the space shuttle disaster: A tale of two theories.Cognition,29, 179–196.
Bower, G. H. (1981). Mood and memory.American Psychologist,36, 129–148.
Bower, G. H., Black, J. B., &Turner, T. J. (1979). Scripts in memory for text.Cognitive Psychology,11, 177–220.
Brown, R., &Kulik, J. (1977). Flashbulb memories.Cognition,5, 73–99.
Bruce, D., &Gaines, M. T. (1976). Tests of an organizational hypothesis of isolation effects in free recall.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,15, 59–72.
Cermak, L. S., &Craik, F. I. M. (1979).Levels of processing in human memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Christianson, S.-Å. (1989). Flashbulb memories: Special, but not so special.Memory & Cognition,17. 435–443.
Christianson, S.-Å, &Loftus, E. F. (1987). Memory for traumatic events.Applied Cognitive Psychology,1, 225–239.
Clark, M., Milberg, S., &Ross, J. (1983). Arousal cues arousal-related material in memory: Implications for understanding effects of mood on memory.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,22, 633–649.
Clifford, B. R., &Hollin, C. R. (1981). Effects of the type of incident and the number of perpetrators on eyewitness memory.Journal of Applied Psychology,66, 364–370.
Cohen, M. E., &Carr, W. J. (1975). Facial recognition and the von Restorff effect.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,6, 383–384.
Conway, M. A., &Gathercole, S. E. (1987). Modality and long-term memory.Journal of Memory & Language,26, 341–361.
Conway, M. A., &Gathercole, S. E. (1990). Writing and long-term memory: Evidence for a “translation” hypothesis.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,42A, 513–527.
Cronbach, L. J., &Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests.Psychological Bulletin,52, 281–302.
Craik, F. I. M., &Blankstein, K. R. (1975). Psychophysiology and human memory. In P. H. Venables & M. J. Christie (Eds.),Research in psychophysiology (pp. 388–417). London: Wiley.
Craik, F. I. M., &Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,11, 671–684.
Craik, F. J. M., &Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,104, 268–294.
Desrochers, A., &Begg, I. (1987). A theoretical account of encoding and retrieval processes in the use of imagery-based mnemonic techniques: The special case of the keyword method. In M. A. McDaniel & M. Pressley (Eds.),Imagery and related mnemonic processes: Theories, individual differences, and applications (pp. 56–77). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Duncan, C. P. (1974). Retrieval of low-frequency words from mixed lists.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,4, 137–138.
Einstein, G. O., &McDaniel, M. A. (1987). Distinctiveness and the mnemonic benefits of bizarre imagery. In M. A. McDaniel & M. Pressley (Eds.),Imagery and related mnemonic processes: Theories, individual differences, and applications (pp. 78–102). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Einstkin, G. O., McDaniel, M. A., &Lackey, S. (1989). Bizarre imagery, interference, and distinctiveness.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 137–146.
Ellis, H. C. (1985). On the importance of mood intensity and encoding demands in memory: Commentary on Hasher, Rose, Zacks, Sanft, and Dören.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,114, 392–395.
Ellis, H. C, Thomas, R. L., McFarlano, A. D., &Lane, J. W. (1985). Emotional mood states and retrieval in episodic memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, dt Cognition.11, 363–370.
Ellis, H. C, Thomas, R. L., &Rodriguez, I. A. (1984). Emotional mood states and memory: Elaborative encoding, semantic processing, and cognitive effort.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,10, 470–482.
Ellis.N. R., Detterman, D. K., Runcie, D., Mccarver, R. B., &Craig.E. (1971). Amnesic effects in short-term memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology,89, 357–361.
Eysenck.M. W. (1978). Levels of processing: A critique.British Journal of Psychology,69, 157–169.
Eysenck, M. W. (1979). Depth, elaboration, and distinctiveness. In L. S. Cermak & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.),Levels of processing in human memory (pp. 89–118). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Friedman, A. (1979). Framing pictures: The role of knowledge in automatized encoding and memory for gist.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,108, 316–355.
Gardiner, J. M., &Gregg, V. H. (1979). When auditory memory is not overwritten.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,18, 705–719.
Garner, W. R., Hake, H., &Eriksen, C. W. (1956). Operationism and the concept of perception.Psychological Review,63, 149–159.
Gathercole, S. E., &Conway, M. A. (1988). Exploring long-term modality effects: Vocalization leads to best retention.Memory & Cognition,16, 110–119.
Gati, I, &Ben-Shakhar, G. (1990). Novelty and significance in orientation and habituation: A feature-matching approach,Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,119, 251–263.
Gati, I., &Tversky, A. (1984). Weighting common and distinctive features in perceptual and conceptual judgments.Cognitive Psychology,16, 341–370.
Gati, I., &Tversky, A. (1987). Recall of common and distinctive features of verbal and pictorial stimuli.Memory & Cognition,15, 97–100.
Going, M., &Read, J. D. (1974). Effects of uniqueness, sex of subject, and sex of photograph on facial recognition.Perceptual & Motor Skills,39, 109–110.
Goodman, G. S. (1980). Picture memory; How the action schema affects retention.Cognitive Psychology,12, 473–495.
Graesser, A. C, Gordon, S. E., &Sawyer, J. D. (1979). Recognition memory for typical and atypical actions in scripted activities: Tests of a script pointer + tag hypothesis.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,18, 319–332.
Graf, P., &Ryan, L. (1990). Transfer-appropriate processing for implicit and explicit memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 978–992.
Green, R. T. (1958). The attention-getting value of structural change.British Journal of Psychology,49, 311–314.
Gregg, V. H. (1976). Word frequency, recognition and recall. In J. Brown (Ed.),Recall and recognition (pp. 183–215). London: Wiley.
Gregg, V. H., Montgomery, D. C, &Castano, D. (1980). Recall of common and uncommon words form pure and mixed lists.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,19, 240–245.
Heuer, F., &Rkisberg, D. (1990). Vivid memories of emotional events: The accuracy of remembered minutiae.Memory & Cognition,18, 496–506.
Hirshman, E. (1988). The expectation-violation effect: Paradoxical effects of semantic relatedness.Journal of Memory & Language,27, 40–58.
Hirshman, E., &Bjork, R. A. (1988). The generation effect: Support for a two-factor theory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,14, 484–494.
Hirshman, E,, Whelley, M. M., &Palij, M. (1989). An investigation of paradoxical memory effects.Journal of Memorv & Language,28, 594–609.
Hock, H. S., Romanski, L., Galie, A., &Williams, C. S. (1975). Real-world schemata and scene recognition in adults and children.Memory & Cognition,6, 423–431.
Hunt, R. R., &Einstein, G. O. (1981). Relational and item-specific information in memory.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,20, 497–514.
Hunt, R. R., &Elliot, J. M. (1980). The role of nonsemantic information in memory: Orthographic distinctiveness effects on retention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,109, 49–74.
Hunt, R. R., &Mitchell, D, B. (1978). Specificity in nonsemantic orienting tasks and distinctive memory traces.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,4, 121–135.
Hunt, R. R., &Mitchell, D. B. (1982). Independent effects of semantic and nonsemantic distinctiveness.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,8, 81–87.
Isen, A.M. (1984). Toward understanding the role of affect in cognition. In R. Wyer & T. Srull (Eds.),Handbook of social cognition (pp. 179–236). Hillsdale, NL: Erlbaum.
Isen, A. M. (1985). Asymmetry of happiness and sadness in effects on memory in normal college students: Comment on Hasher, Rods, Zacks, Sanft, and Dören.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,114, 388–391.
James, W. (1950).The principles of psychology. New York: Dover. (Original work published 1890)
Jenkins, W. O., &Postman, L. (1948). Isolation and spread of effect in serial learning.American Journal of Psychology,61, 214–221.
Johnston, C. D., &Jenkins, J. J. (1971), Two more incidental tasks that differentially affect associative clustering in recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology,89, 92–95.
Kahneman, D. (1973).Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Kaplan, R. M., &Pascoe, G. C. (1977). Humorous lectures and humorous examples: Some effects upon comprehension and retention.Journal of Educational Psychology,69, 61–65.
Karis, D., Fabiani, M, &Donchin, F. (1984). “P300” and memory; Individual differences in the von Restorff effect.Cognitive Psychology,16, 177–216.
Kausler, D. H. (1973). Orthographic distinctiveness of homonyms and the feature tagging hypothesis.American Journal of Psychology,86, 141–149.
Keenan, J. M., Baillet, S. D., &Brown, P. (1984). The effects of causal cohesion on comprehension and memory.Journal of Verbal Learning &. Verbal Behavior,23, 115–126.
Kinoshita, S. (1989). Generation enhances semantic processing? The role of distinctiveness in the generation effect.Memory & Cognition,17, 563–571.
Kintsch, W., &Bates, E. (1977). Recognition memory for statements from a classroom lecture.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,3, 150–159.
Kleinsmith, L. J., &Kaplan, S. (1963). Paired-associate learning as a function of arousal and interpolated activity.Journal of Experimental Psychology,65, 190–193.
Kolers, P. A. (1973). Remembering operations.Memory & Cognition,1, 347–355.
Kolers, P. A. (1974). Two kinds of recognition.Canadian Journal of Psychology,28, 51–61.
Kolers, P. A. (1975). Memorial consequences of automatized encoding.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,1, 689–701.
Kolers, P. A., &Ostry, D. J. (1974). Time course of loss of information regarding pattern analyzing operations.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,13, 599–612.
Light, L. L., Kayra-Stuart, F., &Hollander, S. (1979). Recognition memory for typical and unusual faces.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,5, 212–228.
Loess, H., &Waugh, N. C. (1967). Short-term memory and intertriai interval,Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,6, 455–460.
Loftus, E. F., &Burns, T. E. (1982). Mental shock can produce retrograde amnesia.Memory & Cognition,10, 318–323.
Maltzman, I., Kantor, W., &Langdon, B. (1966). Immediate and delayed retention, arousal, and the orienting and defensive reflexes.Psychonomic Science,6, 445–446.
Marschark, M. (1985). Imagery and organization in the recall of prose.Journal of Memory & Language,24, 734–745.
Marschark, M., &Hunt, R. R. (1989). A reexamination of the role of imagery in learning and memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 710–720.
Marschark, M., Richman, C. L., Yuille, J. C, &Hunt, R. R. (1987). The role of imagery in memory: On shared and distinctive information.Psychological Bulletin,102, 28–41.
May, R. B., &Tryk, H. E. (1970). Word sequence, word frequency, and free recall.Canadian Journal of Psychology,24, 299–304.
McCloskey, M., Wible, C, &Cohen, N. (1988). Is there a special flashbulb memory mechanism?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,117, 171–181.
McDaniel, M. A., &Einstein, G. O. (1986). Bizarre imagery as an effective memory: The importance of distinctiveness.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,12, 54–65.
McDaniel, M. A., Waddill, P. J., &Einstein, G. O. (1988). A contextual account of the generation effect: A three-factor theory.Journal of Memory & language,27, 521–536.
McGhee, P. E. (1983). The role of arousal and hemispheric lateralization in humor. In P. E. McGhee & J. H. Goldstein (Eds.), Handbook of humor research: Vol. I. Basic issues (pp. 13–37). New York: Springer-Verlag.
McLaughlin, J. P. (1968). Recall and recognition measures of the von Restorff effect in serial learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology,78, 99–102.
Mitchell, D. B., &Hunt, R. R. (1989). How much “effort” should be devoted to memory?Memory & Cognition,17, 337–348.
Morris, C D., Bransford, J. D., &Franks, J. J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,16, 519–533.
Murphy, G. L., &Medin, D. L. (1985). The role of theories in conceptual coherence.Psychological Review,92, 289–316.
Myers, J. L., Shinjo, M., &Duffy, S.A. (1987). Degree of causal relatedness and memory.Journal of Memory & Language,26, 453–465.
Neisser, U. (1982). Snapshots or benchmarks? In U. Neisser (Ed.), Memory observed (pp. 43–48). San Francisco: Freeman.
Nelson, D. L. (1979). Remembering pictures and words: Appearance, significance and name. In L. S. Cermak & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Levels of processing in human memory (pp. 45–76). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Neville, H. J., Kutas, M., Chesney, G, &Schmidt, A. L. (1986). Event-related brain potentials during initial encoding and recognition memory of congruous and incongruous words.Journal of Memory & Language,25, 75–92.
Nosofsky, R. M. (1986). Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,115, 39–57.
O’brien, E. J., &Myers, J. L. (1985). When comprehension difficulty improves memory lor text.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,11, 12–21.
Ohman, A. (1979). The orienting response, attention, and learning: An information-processing perspective. In H. D. Kimmell, E. H. van Olst, & J. E. Orlebeke (Eds.), The orienting reflex in humans (pp. 443–471). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Paivio, A, (1971).imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Paivio, A., &Csapo, K. (1969). Concrete-image and verbal memory codes.Journal of Experimental Psychology,80, 279–285.
Pendergrass, B. E., &Kimmel, H. D. (1968). UCR diminution in temporal conditioning and habituation.Journal of Experimental Psychology,77, 1–6.
Pezdek, K., Whetstone, T., Reynolds, K., Askari, N., &Dougherty, T. (1989). Memory for real-world scenes: The role of consistency with schema expectation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 587–595.
Pillemer, D. (1984). Flashbulb memories of the assassination attempt on President Reagan.Cognition,16, 63–80.
Pillemer, D. (1990). Clarifying the flashbulb memory concept: Comment on McCloskey, Wible, and Cohen (1988).Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,119, 92–96.
Randsdell, S. R., &Fischler, I. (1989). Effects of concreteness and task context on recall of prose among bilingual and monolingual sneakers.Journal of Memory & Language,28, 278–291.
Raymond, J. E., & Aknell, K. M. (1990, November). Factors producing a temporary “blink” in attention in an RSVP task. Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, New Orleans.
Ritov, I., Gati, I., &Tversky, A. (1990). Differential weighting of common and distinctive components.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,119, 30–41,
Rosch, E. H., (1973). Natural categories.Cognitive Psychology,4, 328–350.
Rosch, E. H., &Mervis, C. B. (1975). Fuzzy set theory and class inclusion relations in semantic categories.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,22, 509–525.
Rosen, R. C, &Beck, J. G. (1988).Patterns of sexual arousal: Psychophysiological processes and clinical applications. New York: Gilford.
Rundus, D. (1971). Analysis of rehearsal processes in free recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology,89, 63–77.
Schmidt, S. R. (1985). Encoding and retrieval processes in the memory for conceptually distinctive events.Journal of Experimental Psychology; Learning, Memory, & Cognition,11, 565–578.
Schmidt, S. R. (1988, May).Is the generation effect a type of distinctiveness? Paper presented at the meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago, IL.
Schmidt, S. R. (1990a, November).Memory for humorous sentences: A preliminary analysis. Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, New Orleans.
Schmidt, S. R. (1990b). A test of resource-allocation explanations of the generation effect.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,28, 93–96.
Schmidt, S. R. (1991). Evaluating the distinctiveness interpretation of the generation effect.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,43A(4).
Schmidt, S. R., &Cherry, K. (1989). The negative generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon.Memory & Cognition,17, 359–369.
Schulz, L. S. (1971). Effects of high-priority events on recall and recognition of other events.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,10, 322–330.
Slamecka, N.J., &Graf, P. (1978). The generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,4, 592–604.
Slamecka, N. J., &Katsaiti, L. T. (1987). The generation effects as an artifact of selective displaced rehearsal.Journal of Memory & Language.26, 589–607.
Sokolov, E. N. (1963).Perception and the conditioned reflex. New York: Macmillan.
Stein, B. S. (1978). Depth of processing reexamined: The effects of precision of encoding and test appropriateness.Journal of Verbal teaming & Verbal Behavior,17, 165–374.
Tulving, E. (1969). Retrograde amnesia in free recall.Science,164, 88–9(1.
Tversky, A. (1977). Features of similarity.Psychological Review,84, 327–352.
Tyler, S. W., Hertel, P. T., McCallum, M. C, &Ellis, H. C. (1979). Cognitive effort and memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,5, 607–617.
Van Dam, G., Peeck, J., Brinkerink, M., &Gorter, U. (1974). The isolation effect in free recall and recognition.American Journal of Psychology,87, 497–504.
Von Restorff, H. (1933). Über die Wirkung von Bereichsbildungen im Spurenfeld.Psychologische Forschung,18, 299–342.
Wallace, W. P. (1965), Review of the historical, empirical, and theoretical status of the von Restorff phenomenon.Psychological Bulletin,63, 410–424.
Watkins, O. C., &Watkins, M. J. (1975). Buildup of proactive inhibition as a cue-overload effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology; Human Learning & Memory,104, 442–452.
Waugh, N. C. (1969). Free recall of conspicuous items.Journal of Verbal learning & Verbal Behavior,8, 448–456.
Weichselgartner, E., &Sperling, G. (1987). Dynamics of automatic and controlled visual attention.Science,238, 778–780.
Wollen, K. A., Weber, A., &Lowry, D. H. (1972). Bizarreness versus interaction of mental images as determinants of learning.Cognitive Psychology,3, 518–523.
Zechmeister, E. B. (1969). Orthographic distinctiveness.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,8, 754–761.
Zechmeister, E. B. (1972). Orthographic distinctiveness as a variable in word recognition.American Journal of Psychology,85, 425–430.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schmidt, S.R. Can we have a distinctive theory of memory?. Memory & Cognition 19, 523–542 (1991). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197149
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197149