Abstract
What is the nature of the representation underlying memory for future tasks such as calling the doctor or buying milk? If this representation consists of a verbal instruction that is translated into action at the time of retrieval, then memory should be better when tested via verbatim recall of the instruction than when tested via actual performance. Three experiments rejected this possibility, indicating better memory for a perform mode of report than for a recall mode of report. This was true in Experiment 1 in which subjects saw a series of verbal instructions (e.g., “move the eraser,” “lift the cup,” “touch the ashtray”), with advance information regarding the mode of report required during testing. In Experiment 2, the advance cue was valid only in 75% of the trials. Memory depended more heavily on the expected mode of report thanon the actual mode ofreport, suggesting that the perform superiority is due to processes that occur during encoding. In Experiment 3, subjects learned 20 phrases depicting minitasks were remembered by subjects tested via performance than by subjects tested via verbatim recall. A second part of Experiment 3 also indicated superior memory when a perform test was expected, regardless of which mode of report was actually required. The results were compared with the finding that subject-performed tasks are better remembered thanare their verbal instructions, which suggeststhat the representation underlying memory for future assignments-may-take advantage of the imaginal-enactive properties ofthe envisagedacts. Other possible differences between memory for to-be-recalled tasks and memory for to-be-performed tasks are discussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, R. E. (1984), Did I do it or did I only imagine doing it?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,113, 594–613.
Backman, L., &Nillson, L.-G., (1984). Aging effects in free recall: An exception to the rule.Human Learning,3, 53–69.
Backman, L., Nilsson, L.-G., &Chalom, D. (1986). New evidence on the nature of the encoding of action events.Memory & Cognition,14, 339–346.
Bennett, H. L. (1983). Remembering drink orders: The memory skills of cocktail waitresses.Human Learning,2, 157–169.
Cohen, R. L. (1981). On the generality of some memory laws.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,22, 267–281.
Cohen, R. L. (1983). The effect of encoding variables on the free recall of words and action events.Memory & Cognition,11, 575–582.
Cohen, R. L., &Stewart, M. (1982). How to avoid developmental effects in free recall.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,23, 9–15.
Engelkamp, J., &Zimmer, H. D. (1984). Motor programme information as a separable memory unit.Psychological Research,46, 283–299.
Engelkamp, J., &Zimmer, H. O. (1985). Motor programs and their relation to semantic memory.German Journal of Psychology,9, 239–254.
Greenwald, A. G. (1981). Self and memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 15, pp. 201–236). New York: Academic Press.
Harris, J. E. (1984). Remembering to do things: A forgotten topic. In J. E. Harris & P. E. Morris (Eds.),Everyday memory actions and absent mindedness (pp. 71–92). London: Academic Press.
Helstrup, T. (1986). Separate memory laws for recall of performed acts?Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,27, 1–29.
Helstrup, T. (1987). One, two, or three memories? Aproblem-solving approach to memory for performed acts.Acta Psychologica,66, 37–68.
Johnson, M. K. (1988). Reality monitoring: An experimental phenomenological approach.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,117, 390–394.
Kausler, D. H., &Hakami, M. K. (1983). Memory for activities: Adult age differences and intentionality.Developmental Psychology,19, 889–894.
Klatzky, R. L., Pellegrino, J. W., McCloskey, B. P., &Doherty, S. (1989). Can you squeeze a tomato? The role of motor representation in semantic sensibility judgments.Journal of Memory & Language,28, 56–77.
Koriat, A., &Ben-Zur, H. (1988). Remembering that I did it: Processes and deficits in output monitoring. In M. Gruneberg, P. Morris, & R. Sykes (Eds.),Practical aspects of memory: Current research and issues (Vol. 1, pp. 203–208). Chichester: Wiley.
Koriat, A., Ben-Zur, H., &Sheffer, D. (1988). Telling the same story twice: Output monitoring and age.Journal of Memory & Language,27, 23–39.
Levin, J. R. (1976). What have we learned about maximizing what children learn? In G. R. Levin & V. L. Allen (Eds.),Cognitive learning in children (pp. 105–134): New York: Academic Press.
Marschark, M., Richman, C. L., Yuille, J. C., &Hunt, R. R. (1987). The role of imagery in memory: On shared and distinctive information.Psychological Bulletin,102, 28–41.
Mohr, G., Engelkamp, J., &Zimmer, H. D. (1989). Recall and recognition of self-performed acts.Psychological Research,51, 181–187.
Paivio, A. (1971).Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Paivio, A. (1986).Mental representations: A dual-coding approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Saltz, E., &Dixon, D. (1982). Let’s pretend: The role of motoric imagery in memory for sentences and words.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,34, 77–92.
Saltz, E., &Donnenwerth-Nolan, S. (1981). Does motoric imagery facilitate memory for sentences? A selective interference test.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,20, 322–332.
Tversky, B. (1969). Pictorial and verbal encoding in a short-term memory task.Perception & Psychophysics,6, 225–233.
Wilkins, A. J., &Baddeley, A. D. (1978). Remembering to recall in everyday life: An approach to absent-mindedness, In M. Gruneberg, P. Morris, & R. Sykes (Eds.),Practical aspects of memory. London: Academic Press.
Winograd, E. (1988). Some observations on prospective remembering. In M. Gruneberg, P. Morris, & R. Sykes (Eds.),Practical aspects of memory: Current research and issues (Vol. 1, pp. 348–353). Chichester: Wiley.
Zimmer, H. D., &Engelkamp, J. (1985). An attempt to distinguish between kinematic and motor memory components.Acta Psychologica,58, 81–106.
Zimmer, H. D., &Engelkamp, J. (1989). One, two or three memories: Some comments and new findings.Acta Psychologica,70, 293–304.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The study was conducted at the Institute of Information Processing and Decision Making, University of Haifa.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Koriat, A., Ben-Zur, H. & Nussbaum, A. Encoding information for future action: Memory for to-be-performed tasks versus memory for to-be-recalled tasks. Memory & Cognition 18, 568–578 (1990). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197099
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197099