Abstract
Recognition memory judgments have long been assumed to depend on the contributions of two underlying processes: recollection and familiarity. We measured recollection with receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) data and remember-know judgments. Under standard remember-know instructions, the two estimates of recollection diverged. When subjects were told they might need to justify theirremember responses to the experimenter, the two estimates were more likely to agree. The data support the conclusion thatremember responses are generally based on a continuous underlying process but that specific task instructions can produce data that appear consistent with a high-threshold recollective process. Models based on signal detection theory provide a better account of these data than does the dual-process model (Yonelinas, 1994) or process-pure interpretations.
Article PDF
References
Coltheart, M. (1981). The MRC Psycholinguistic Database.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,33A, 497–505.
Donaldson, W. (1996). The role of decision processes in remembering and knowing.Memory & Cognition,24, 523–533.
Dunn, J. C. (2004). Remember-know: A matter of confidence.Psychological Review,111, 524–542.
Gardiner, J. M., &Richardson-Klavehn, A. (2000). Remembering and knowing. In E. Tulving & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.),The Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 229–244). New York: Oxford University Press.
Hicks, J. L., &Marsh, R. L. (1999). Remember-know judgments can depend on how memory is tested.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,6, 117–122.
Higham, P. A., &Vokey, J. R. (2004). Illusory recollection and dualprocess models of recognition memory.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,57A, 714–744.
Hirshman, E., &Henzler, A. (1998). The role of decision processes in conscious recollection.Psychological Science,9, 61–65.
Hirshman, E., &Master, S. (1997). Modeling the conscious correlates of recognition memory: Reflections on the remember-know paradigm.Memory & Cognition,25, 345–351.
Kučera, H., &Francis, W. N. (1967).Computational analysis of presentday American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
Rajaram, S. (1993). Remembering and knowing: Two means of access to the personal past.Memory & Cognition,21, 89–102.
Rotello, C. M., Macmillan, N. A., &Reeder, J. A. (2004). Sum-difference theory of remembering and knowing: A two-dimensional signal detection model.Psychological Review,111, 588–616.
Tulving, E. (1985). Memory and consciousness.Canadian Psychology,26, 1–12.
Wixted, J. T., &Stretch, V. (2004). In defense of the signal detection interpretation of remember/know judgments.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,11, 616–641.
Yonelinas, A. P. (1994). Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: Evidence for a dual-process model.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 1341–1354.
Yonelinas, A. P. (2001). Consciousness, control, and confidence: The 3 Cs of recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,130, 361–379.
Yonelinas, A. P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research.Journal of Memory & Language,46, 441–517.
Yonelinas, A. P., Dobbins, I., Szymanski, M. D., Dhaliwal, H. S., &King, L. (1996). Signal-detection, threshold, and dual-process models of recognition memory: ROCs and conscious recollection.Consciousness & Cognition,5, 418–441.
Yonelinas, A. P., Kroll, N. E. A., Dobbins, I., Lazzara, M., &Knight, R. T. (1998). Recollection and familiarity deficits in amnesia: Convergence of remember-know, process dissociation, and receiver operating characteristic data.Neuropsychology,12, 323–339.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by Grant R01 MH60274 from the National Institutes of Health to C.M.R. and N.A.M.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rotello, C.M., Macmillan, N.A., Reeder, J.A. et al. Theremember response: Subject to bias, graded, and not a process-pure indicator of recollection. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 12, 865–873 (2005). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196778
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196778