Abstract
When participants have to respond to stimuli of two modalities, faster reaction times are observed for simultaneous, bimodal events than for unimodal events (the redundant target effect [RTE]). This finding has been interpreted as reflecting processing gains for bimodal relative to unimodal stimuli, possibly due to multisensory interactions. In random stimulus sequences, reaction times are slower when the stimulus is preceded by a stimulus of a different modality (modality switch effect [MSE]). Simple reaction time redundant target experiments with auditory-visual, visual-tactile, and auditory-tactile stimulus combinations were run to determine whether the RTE may be partly explained by MSEs because bimodal stimuli do not require a modality switch. In all three modality pairings, significant MSEs and RTEs were observed. However, the RTE was still significant after reaction times were corrected for the MSE, supporting the hypothesis that coactivation occurs independently of modality switch costs.
Article PDF
References
Giray, M., &Ulrich, R. (1993). Motor coactivation revealed by response force in divided and focused attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,19, 1278–1291.
Miller, J. (1982). Divided attention: Evidence for coactivation with redundant signals.Cognitive Psychology,14, 247–279.
Miller, J. (1986). Timecourse of coactivation in bimodal divided attention.Perception & Psychophysics,40, 331–343.
Miller, J. (1991). Channel interaction and the redundant target effect in bimodal divided attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,17, 160–169.
Miniussi, C., Girelli, M., &Marzi, C. A. (1998). Neural site of the redundant target effect electrophysiological evidence.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,10, 216–230.
Posner, M. I., Nissen, M. J., &Klein, R. M. (1976). Visual dominance: An information processing account of its origins and significance.Psychological Review,83, 157–171.
Raab, D. H. (1962). Statistical facilitation of simple reaction times.Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences,24, 574–590.
Schröger, E., &Widmann, A. (1998). Speeded responses to audiovisual signal changes result from bimodal integration.Psychophysiology,35, 755–759.
Spence, C., Nicholls, M. E. R., &Driver, J. (2001). The cost of expecting events in the wrong sensory modality.Perception & Psychophysics,63, 330–336.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This study was supported by Grant Ro 1226/4-1 to B.R. from the German Research Foundation (DFG).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gondan, M., Lange, K., Rösler, F. et al. The redundant target effect is affected by modality switch costs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 11, 307–313 (2004). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196575
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196575