Abstract
Kim and Cave (1999) used spatial probes in order to measure the effects of bottom-up and top-down factors on the allocation of spatial attention over time. Subjects searched for a target with a unique shape, with a uniquely colored distractor present on each trial. The singleton distractor captured attention early in processing, whereas attention homed in on the target’s location later on. Kim and Cave (1999) concluded that top–down factors cannot prevent the presence of a salient distractor from delaying target selection. The present study tested the idea that such results were obtained only because subjects adopted the strategy of searching for the most salient item. Kim and Cave’s (1999) finding was replicated in Experiment 1. In Experiment 2, instead of a feature search, subjects performed a conjunction search—that is, a task that could not be performed using a salience–based strategy. Probe response times were longest at the salient distractor’s location at both the short and the long stimulus onset asynchronies. These results suggest that, early in processing, top–down factors can exert their influence and prevent the capture of attention by a salient distractor.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Rererences
Bacon, W. F., &Egeth, H. E. (1994). Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture.Perception & Psychophysics,55, 485–496.
Bundesen, C. (1990). A theory of visual attention.Psychological Review,97, 523–547.
Cave, K. R., &Wolfe, J. M. (1990). Modeling the role of parallel processing in visual search.Cognitive Psychology,22, 225–271.
Folk, C. L., Leber, A. B., &Egeth, H. E. (2002). Made you blink! Contingent attentional capture produces a spatial blink.Perception & Psychophysics,64, 741–753.
Folk, C. L., &Remington, R. W. (1998). Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant feature singletons: Evidence for two forms of attentional capture.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 847–858.
Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., &Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert attention orienting is contingent on attentional control settings.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 1030–1044.
Hoffman, J. E., &Nelson, B. (1981). Spatial selectivity in visual search.Perception & Psychophysics,30, 283–290.
Hoffman, J. E., Nelson, B., &Houck, M. R. (1983). The role of attentional resources in automatic detection.Cognitive Psychology,15, 379–410.
Kim, M.-S., &Cave, K. R. (1995). Spatial attention in visual search for features and feature conjunctions.Psychological Science,6, 376–380.
Kim, M.-S., &Cave, K. R. (1999).Top-down and bottom-up attentional control: On the nature of the interference from a salient distractor.Perception & Psychophysics,61, 1009–1023.
Lamy, D., & Egeth, H. E. (in press). Bottom–up capture in the singletondetection and in feature search.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance.
Lamy, D., Leber, A., & Egeth, H. E. (2002).Effects of bottom-up salience within the feature search mode. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Lamy, D., &Tsal, Y. (1999). A salient distractor does not disrupt conjunction search.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,6, 93–98.
Pashler, H. (1988). Cross-dimensional interaction and texture segregation.Perception & Psychophysics,43, 307–318.
Remington, R. W., Johnston, J. C., &Yantis, S. (1992). Involuntary attentional capture by abrupt onsets.Perception & Psychophysics,51, 279–290.
Theeuwes, J. (1991a). Cross–dimensional perceptual selectivity.Perception & Psychophysics,50, 184–193.
Theeuwes, J. (1991b). Exogenous and endogenous control of attention: The effect of visual onsets and offsets.Perception & Psychophysics,49, 83–90.
Theeuwes, J. (1992). Perceptual selectivity for color and form.Perception & Psychophysics,51, 599–606.
Theeuwes, J. (1995). Temporal and spatial characteristics of preattentive and attentive processing.Visual Cognition,2, 221–233.
Theeuwes, J., Atchley, P., &Kramer, A. F. (2000). On the time course of top-down and bottom-up control of visual attention. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.),Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 105–124). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Theeuwes, J., &Burger, R. (1998). Attentional control during visual search: The effect of irrelevant singletons.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 1342–1353.
Todd, S., &Kramer, A. F. (1994). Attentional misguidance in visual search.Perception & Psychophysics,56, 198–210.
Treisman, A., &Sato, S. (1990). Conjunction search revisited.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 459–478.
Turatto, M., &Galfano, G. (2001). Attentional capture by color without any relevant attentional set.Perception & Psychophysics,63, 286–297.
Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided Search 2.0: A revised model of visual search.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,1, 202–238.
Yantis, S., &Egeth, H. E. (1999). On the distinction between visual salience and stimulus-driven attentional capture.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,25, 661–676.
Yantis, S., &Jonides, J. (1990). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Voluntary versus automatic allocation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 121–134.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Support for this research was provided by NIMH Grant MH57388 to H.E.E. and by an Israel Science Foundation grant to Y.T.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lamy, D., Tsal, Y. & Egeth, H.E. Does a salient distractor capture attention early in processing?. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 10, 621–629 (2003). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196524
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196524