Abstract
Two experiments are reported in which subjects performed working memory and enumeration tasks. In the first experiment, subjects scoring low on the working memory task also performed poorly on the attention-demanding “counting” portion of the enumeration task. Yet no span differences were found for the non-attention-demanding “subitizing” portion. In Experiment 2, conjunctive and disjunctive distractors were added to the enumeration task. Although both high and low working memory span subjects were adversely affected by the addition of conjunctive distractors, the effect was much greater for the low-span subjects. Implications from these findings are that differences in working memory capacity correspond to differences in capability for controlled attention.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baddeley, A. D. (1986).Working memory. New York: Oxford University Press.
Baddeley, A. D., &Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 47–90). New York: Academic Press.
Cantor, J., &Engle, R. W. (1993). Working memory capacity as longterm memory activation: An individual differences approach.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,5, 1101–1114.
Chi, M. T. H., &Klahr, D. (1975). Span and rate of apprehension in children and adults.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,19, 434–439.
Conway, A. R. A., Cowan, N., Bunting, M. F., Therriault, D., & Minkoff, S. (2000).A latent variable analysis of working memory capacity, short term memory capacity, processing speed, and general fluid intelligence. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Conway, A. R. A., &Engle, R. W. (1994). Working memory and retrieval: A resource-dependent inhibition model.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,123, 354–373.
Conway, A. R. A., Tuholski, S. W., Shisler, R. J., &Engle, R. W. (1999). The effect of memory load on negative priming: An individual differences investigation.Memory & Cognition,27, 1042–1050.
Cowan, N. (1988). Evolving conceptions of memory storage, selective attention, and their mutual constraints within the human information processing system.Psychological Bulletin,104, 163–191.
Cowan, N. (1995).Attention and memory: An integrated framework. New York: Oxford University Press.
Daneman, M., &Carpenter, P. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,19, 450–466.
Engle, R. W., Kane, M., &Tuholski, S. W. (1999). Individual differences in working memory capacity and what they tell us about controlled attention, general fluid intelligence, and functions of the prefrontal cortex. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.),Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 102–134), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Engle, R. W., Tuholski, S. W., Laughlin, J. E., &Conway, A. R.A. (1999). Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: A latent-variable approach.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,128, 309–331.
Ericsson, K. A., &Dulaney, P. F. (1999). Long-term working memory as an alternative to capacity models of working memory in everyday skilled performance. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.),Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 257–297). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ericsson, K. A., &Kintsch, W. (1995). Long-term working memory.Psychological Review,102, 211–245.
Jevons, W. (1871). The power of numerical discrimination.Nature,3, 281–282.
Kane, M. J., &Engle, R. W. (2000). Working memory capacity, proactive interference, and divided attention: Limits on long-term memory retrieval.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 336–358.
King, J., &Just, M. A. (1991). Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory.Journal of Memory & Language,30, 580–602.
Kyllonen, P. C., &Chrystal, R. E. (1990). Reasoning ability is (little more than) working memory capacity?Intelligence,14, 389–433.
MacDonald, M. C., Just, M. A., &Carpenter, P. A. (1992). Working memory constraints on the processing of syntactic ambiguity.Cognitive Psychology,24, 56–98.
Miyake, A., &Shah, P. (Eds.) (1999).Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and control. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pylyshyn, Z. (1994). Some primitive mechanisms of spatial attention.Cognition,50, 363–384.
Rosen, V. M., &Engle, R. W. (1997). The role of working memory capacity in retrieval.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,126, 211–227.
Rosen, V. M., &Engle, R. W. (1998). Working memory capacity and suppression.Journal of Memory & Language,39, 418–436.
Treisman, A. [M.] (1986). Properties, parts, and objects. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.),Handbook of perception and human performance: Vol. 2. Cognitive processes & performance (pp. 1–70). New York: Wiley.
Treisman, A. M., &Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention.Cognitive Psychology,12, 97–136.
Treisman, A. [M.], &Gormican, S. (1988). Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries.Psychological Review,95, 15–48.
Treisman, A. [M.], &Sato, S. (1990). Conjunction search revisited.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 459–478.
Trick, L. M. &Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1993). What enumeration studies can show us about spatial attention: Evidence for limited capacity preat tentive processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,19, 331–351.
Trick, L. M., &Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1994). Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision.Psychological Review,101, 80–102.
Turner, M. L., &Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent?Journal of Memory & Language,28, 127–154.
Verhaeghen, P., &Salthouse, T. A. (1998). Meta-analysis of age-cognition relations in adulthood: Estimates of linear and nonlinear age effects.Psychological Bulletin,122, 231–249.
Wolfe, J. M., Cave, K. R., &Franzel, S. L. (1989). Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 419–433.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tuholski, S.W., Engle, R.W. & Baylis, G.C. Individual differences in working memory capacity and enumeration. Memory & Cognition 29, 484–492 (2001). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196399
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196399