Abstract
To account for the size effect in numerical comparison, three assumptions about the internal structure of the mental number line (e.g., Dehaene, 1992) have been proposed. These are magnitude coding (e.g., Zorzi & Butterworth, 1999), compressed scaling (e.g., Dehaene, 1992), and increasing variability (e.g., Gallistel & Gelman, 1992). However, there are other tasks besides numerical comparison for which there is clear evidence that the mental number line is accessed, and no size effect has been observed in these tasks. This is contrary to the predictions of these three assumptions. Moreover, all three assumptions have difficulties explaining certain symmetries in priming studies of number naming and parity judgment. We propose a neural network model that avoids these three assumptions but, instead, uses place coding, linear scaling, and constant variability on the mental number line. We train the model on naming, parity judgment, and comparison and show that the size effect appears in comparison, but not in naming or parity judgment. Moreover, no asymmetries appear in primed naming or primed parity judgment with this model, in line with empirical data. Implications of our findings are discussed. This work was supported by Grant P5/04 from the Interuniversity Attraction Poles Program—Belgian Science Policy and by a GOA grant from the Ghent University Research Council to W.F.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Banks, W. P., Fujii, M., &Kayra-Stuart, F. (1976). Semantic congruity effects in comparative judgments of magnitudes of digits.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,2, 435–447.
Brysbaert, M. (1995). Arabic number reading: On the nature of the numerical scale and the origin of phonological recoding.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,124, 434–452.
Buckley, P. B., &Gillman, C. B. (1974). Comparisons of digits and dot patterns.Journal of Experimental Psychology,103, 1131–1136.
Butterworth, B., Zorzi, M., Girelli, L., &Jonckheere, A. R. (2001). Storage and retrieval of addition facts: The role of number comparison.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,54A, 1005–1029.
Carey, S. (2001). Cognitive foundations of arithmetic: Evolution and ontogenesis.Mind & Language,16, 37–55.
Cipolotti, L., &Butterworth, B. (1995). Toward a multiroute model of number processing: Impaired number transcoding with preserved calculation skills.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,124, 375–390.
Dehaene, S. (1992). Varieties of numerical abilities.Cognition,44, 1–42.
Dehaene, S. (2004). The neural bases of subliminal priming. In N. Kanwisher & J. Duncan (Eds.),Functional neuroimaging of visual cognition: Attention and performance XX (pp. 205–224). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., &Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,122, 371–396.
Dehaene, S., Dupoux, E., &Mehler, J. (1990). Is numerical comparison digital? Analogical and symbolic effects in two-digit number comparison.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 626–641.
Dehaene, S., &Mehler, J. (1992). Cross-linguistic regularities in the frequency of number words.Cognition,43, 1–29.
Dehaene, S., Piazza, M., Pinel, P., &Cohen, L. (2003). Three parietal circuits for number processing.Cognitive Neuropsychology,20, 487–506.
Festinger, L. (1943). Studies in decision: I. Decision time, relative frequency of judgment and subjective confidence as related to physical stimulus difference.Journal of Experimental Psychology,32, 291–306.
Fias, W. (2001). Two routes for the processing of verbal numbers: Evidence from the SNARC effect.Psychological Research,65, 250–259.
Fias, W., Brysbaert, M., Geypens, F., &d’Ydewalle, G. (1996). The importance of magnitude information in numerical processing: Evidence from the SNARC effect.Mathematical Cognition,2, 95–110.
Fias, W., Lammertyn, J., Reynvoet, B., Dupont, P., &Orban, G. A. (2003). Parietal representation of symbolic and nonsymbolic magnitude.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,15, 47–56.
Fias, W., Reynvoet, B., &Brysbaert, M. (2001). Are Arabic numerals processed as pictures in a Stroop interference task?Psychological Research,65, 242–249.
Gallistel, C. R., &Gelman, R. (1992). Preverbal and verbal counting and computation.Cognition,44, 43–74.
Göbel, S., Rushworth, M. F. S., &Walsh, V. (2001). rTMS disrupts the representation of small numbers in supramarginal gyrus [Abstract].NeuroImage,13(6, Suppl. 1), 409.
Göbel, S., Walsh, V., &Rushworth, M. F. S. (2001). The mental number line and the human angular gyrus.NeuroImage,14, 1278–1289.
Koechlin, E., Naccache, L., Block, E., &Dehaene, S. (1999). Primed numbers: Exploring the modularity of numerical representations with masked and unmasked semantic priming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,25, 1882–1905.
Link, S. (1990). Modeling imageless thought: The relative judgment theory of numerical comparisons.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,34, 2–41.
Lorch, R. F., Jr., &Myers, J. L. (1990). Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 149–157.
Moyer, R. S., &Landauer, T. K. (1967). Time required for judgements of numerical inequality.Nature,215, 1519–1520.
Nieder, A., Freedman, D. J., &Miller, E. K. (2002). Representation of the quantity of visual items in the primate prefrontal cortex.Science,297, 1708–1711.
Nieder, A., &Miller, E. K. (2003). Coding of cognitive magnitude: Compressed scaling of numerical information in the primate prefrontal cortex.Neuron,37, 149–157.
Nürk, H. C., Weger, U., &Willmes, K. (2001). Decade breaks in the mental number line? Putting the tens and units back in different bins.Cognition,82, B25-B33.
Ratinckx, E., Brysbaert, M., & Fias, W. (2005).Naming two-digit Arabic numerals: Evidence from masked priming studies. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Reynvoet, B., &Brysbaert, M. (1999). Single-digit and two-digit numerals address the same semantic number line.Cognition,72, 191–201.
Reynvoet, B., &Brysbaert, M. (2004). Cross-notation number priming investigated at different stimulus onset asynchronies in parity and naming tasks.Experimental Psychology,51, 81–90.
Reynvoet, B., Brysbaert, M., &Fias, W. (2002). Semantic priming in number naming.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,55A, 1127–1139.
Reynvoet, B., Caessens, B., &Brysbaert, M. (2002). Automatic stimulus—response associations may be semantically mediated.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,9, 107–112.
Schwarz, W., &Stein, F. (1998). On the temporal dynamics of digit comparison processes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 1275–1293.
Sekuler, R., Rubin, E., &Armstrong, R. (1971). Processing numerical information: A choice time analysis.Journal of Experimental Psychology,90, 75–80.
Spelke, E. S., &Tsivkin, S. (2001). Language and number: A bilingual training study.Cognition,78, 45–88.
Trick, L. M., &Pylyshyn, Z.W. (1994). Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision.Psychological Review,101, 80–102.
van Oeffelen, M. P., &Vos, P. G. (1982). A probabilistic model for the discrimination of visual number.Perception & Psychophysics,32, 163–170.
Verguts, T., &Fias, W. (2004). Representation of number in animals and humans: A neural model.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,16, 1493–1504.
Whalen, J., Gallistel, C. R., &Gelman, R. (1999). Nonverbal counting in humans: The psychophysics of number representation.Psychological Science,10, 130–137.
Whalen, J., & Morelli, F. (2002, November).Cognitive neuroscience of number. Poster presented at the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Kansas City, MO.
Widrow, B., &Lehr, M. A. (1990). 30 years of adaptive neural networks: Perceptron, madaline, and backpropagation.Proceedings of the IEEE,78, 1415–1442.
Zorzi, M., &Butterworth, B. (1999). A computational model of number comparison. In M. Hahn & S. C. Stoness (Eds.),Proceedings of the Twenty-First Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 778–783). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Verguts, T., Fias, W. & Stevens, M. A model of exact small-number representation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 12, 66–80 (2005). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196349
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196349