Abstract
Recent studies (Driver et al., 1999; Friesen & Kingstone, 1998; Langton & Bruce, 1999) have argued that the perception of eye gaze may be unique, as compared with other symbolic cues (e.g., arrows), in being able to automatically trigger attentional orienting. In Experiment 1, 17 participants took part in a visuospatial orienting task to investigate whether arrow cues might also trigger automatic orienting. Two arrow cues were presented for 75 msec to the left and right of a fixation asterisk. After an interval of either 25 or 225 msec, the letter O or X appeared. After both time intervals, mean response times were reliably faster when the arrows pointed toward, rather than away from, the location of the target letter. This occurred despite the fact that the participants were informed that the arrows did not predict where the target would appear. In Experiment 2, the same pattern of data was recorded when several adjustments had been made in an attempt to rule out alternative explanations for the cuing effects. Overall, the findings suggest that the eye gaze is not unique in automatically triggering orienting.
Article PDF
References
Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). The eye direction detector (EDD) and the shared attention mechanism (SAM): Two cases for evolutionary psychology. In C. Moore & P. Dunham (Eds.),Joint attention: Its origins and role in development (pp. 41–59). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bruner, J. (1983).Child’s talk: Learning to use language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cohen, J. D., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., &Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: An interactive graphic for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers.Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,25, 257–271.
Driver, J., Davis, G., Ricciardelli, P., Kidd, P., Maxwell, E., &Baron-Cohen, S. (1999). Gaze perception triggers reflexive visuospatial orienting.Visual Cognition,6, 509–540.
Friesen, C. K., &Kingstone, A. (1998). The eyes have it! Reflexive orienting is triggered by nonpredictive gaze.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,5, 490–495.
Jonides, J. (1981). Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind’s eye’s movement. In J. [B.] Long & A. [D.] Baddeley (Eds.),Attention and performance IX (pp. 187–203). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Langton, S. R. H., &Bruce, V. (1999). Reflexive visual orienting in response to the social attention of others.Visual Cognition,6, 541–567.
Müller, H. J., &Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1989). Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: Time course of activation and resistance to interruption.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 315–330.
Perrett, D., &Emery, N. J. (1994). Understanding the intentions of others from visual signals: Neuropsychological evidence.Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive,13, 683–694.
Posner, M. I. (1978).Chronometric explorations of mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,32A, 3–25.
Posner, M. I., &Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bowhuis (Eds.),Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 531–556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Remington, R. W., Johnston, J. C., &Yantis, S. (1992). Involuntary attentional capture by abrupt onsets.Perception & Psychophysics,51, 279–290.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research article was supported by a grant from the Medical Research Council.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tipples, J. Eye gaze is not unique: Automatic orienting in response to uninformative arrows. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 9, 314–318 (2002). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196287
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196287