Abstract
A brightness discrimination experiment was performed to examine how subjects decide whether a patch of pixels is “bright” or “dark,” and stimulus duration, brightness, and speed versus accuracy instructions were manipulated. The diffusion model (Ratcliff, 1978) was fit to the data, and it accounted for all the dependent variables: mean correct and error response times, the shapes of response time distributions for correct and error responses, and accuracy values. Speed-accuracy manipulations affected only boundary separation (response criteria settings) in the model. Drift rate (the rate of accumulation of evidence) in the diffusion model, which represents stimulus quality, increased as a function of stimulus duration and stimulus brightness but asymptoted as stimulus duration increased from 100 to 150 msec. To address the argument that the diffusion model can fit any pattern of data, simulated patterns of plausible data are presented that the model cannot fit.
Article PDF
References
Bloch, A. M. (1885). Expériences sur la vision.Comptes Rendus de la Societé de Biologie,37, 493–495.
Busey, T. A., &Loftus, G. R. (1994). Sensory and cognitive components of visual information acquisition.Psychological Review,101, 446–469.
Carterette, E. C., Friedman, M. P., &Cosmides, R. (1965). Reactiontime distributions in the detection of weak signals in noise.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,38, 531–542.
Espinoza-Varas, B., &Watson, C. S. (1994). Effects of decision criterion on response latencies of binary decisions.Perception & Psychophysics,55, 190–203.
Hacker, M. J. (1980). Speed and accuracy of recency judgments for events in short-term memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,6, 651–675.
Kellogg, W. N. (1931). The time of judgement in psychometric measures.American Journal of Psychology,43, 65–86.
LaBerge, D. A. (1962). A recruitment theory of simple behavior.Psychometrika,27, 375–396.
Laming, D. R. J. (1968).Information theory of choice reaction time. New York: Wiley.
Link, S. W. (1992).The wave theory of difference and similarity. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Luce, R. D. (1986).Response times. New York: Oxford University Press.
Muter, P. A. (1979). Response latencies in discriminations of recency.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,5, 160–169.
Nelder, J. A., &Mead, R. (1965). A simplex method for function minimization.Computer Journal,7, 308–313.
Ratcliff, R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval.Psychological Review,85, 59–108.
Ratcliff, R. (1979). Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics.Psychological Bulletin,86, 446–461.
Ratcliff, R. (1981). A theory of order relations in perceptual matching.Psychological Review,88, 552–572.
Ratcliff, R. (1985). Theoretical interpretations of speed and accuracy of positive and negative responses.Psychological Review,92, 212–225.
Ratcliff, R. (1988). Continuous versus discrete information processing: Modeling the accumulation of partial information.Psychological Review,95, 238–255.
Ratcliff, R., Gomez, P., & McKoon, G. (2002).Diffusion model account of lexical decision. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Ratcliff, R., &Rouder, J. N. (1998). Modeling response times for two-choice decisions.Psychological Science,9, 347–356.
Ratcliff, R., &Rouder, J. N. (2000). A diffusion model account of masking in letter identification.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,26, 127–140.
Ratcliff, R., Thapar, A., &McKoon, G. (2001). The effects of aging on reaction time in a signal detection task.Psychology & Aging,16, 323–341.
Ratcliff, R., & Tuerlinckx, F. (in press). Estimating parameters of the diffusion model: Approaches to dealing with contaminant reaction times and parameter.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
Ratcliff, R., Van Zandt, T., &McKoon, G. (1999). Connectionist and diffusion models of reaction time variability.Psychological Review,106, 261–300.
Rayner, K., Inhoff, A. W., Morrison, R. E., Slowiaczek, M. L., &Bertera, J. H. (1981). Masking of foveal and parafoveal vision dur ing eye fixations in reading.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,7, 167–179.
Roberts, S., &Pashler, H. (2000). How persuasive is a good fit? A comment on theory testing.Psychological Review,107, 358–367.
Sekuler, R. W. (1965). Signal detection, choice response times, and visual backward masking.Canadian Journal of Psychology,19, 118–132.
Slamecka, N. J. (1991). The analysis of recognition. In W. E. Hockley & S. Lewandowsky (Eds.),Relating theory and data: Essays on human memory in honor of Bennet B. Murdock (pp. 297–306). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Smith, P. L. (1995). Psychophysically principled models of visual simple reaction time.Psychological Review,102, 567–591.
Smith, P. L. (1998). Bloch’s law predictions from diffusion process models of detection.Australian Journal of Psychology,50, 139–147.
Smith, P. L., &Vickers, D. (1988). The accumulator model of two-choice discrimination.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,32, 135–168.
Stone, M. (1960). Models for choice reaction time.Psychometrika,25, 251–260.
Swensson, R. G. (1972). The elusive tradeoff: Speed vs. accuracy in visual discrimination tasks.Perception & Psychophysics,12, 16–32.
Watson, A. B. (1986). Temporal sensitivity. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.),Handbook of perception and human performance (pp. 6-1 to 6-43. New York: Wiley.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The research in this article was supported by NIMH Grants K05 MH01891 and R37 MH44640.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ratcliff, R. A diffusion model account of response time and accuracy in a brightness discrimination task: Fitting real data and failing to fit fake but plausible data. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 9, 278–291 (2002). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196283
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196283