Abstract
Inhibition is often proposed as an important executive-control process, but its existence is difficult to establish empirically. Recently, Mayr and Keele (2000) reported that it takes longer to switch to a recently disengaged task set (i.e.,n−2 task-set repetitions) than to a less recently disengaged task set. Thissetalternation cost may indicate inhibition of the disengaged task set. The primary goal of the present study was to test the inhibition account of set-alternation costs against an important alternative account based on automatic episodic retrieval. The episodic retrieval account predicts reaction time facilitation instead of costs for the special case ofcomplete n−2 repetitions of both task sets and all stimulus— response aspects. A new task-switching paradigm, in which action rules varied on a trial-by-trial basis while the relevant stimulus dimension remained invariant, allowed the implementation of a high proportion of completen−2 repetitions. Consistent with the inhibition view, set-alternation costs were obtained even for these constellations.
Article PDF
References
Allport, D. A., Styles, E. A., &Hsieh, S. (1994). Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitsch (Eds.),Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 421–452). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Allport, [D.] A., &Wylie, G. (2000). Task-switching, stimulus— response bindings, and negative priming. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.),Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 35–70). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Amos, A. (2000). A computational model of information processing in the frontal cortex and the basal ganglia.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,12, 505–519.
Anderson, J. R. (1993).Rules of the mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Anderson, M. C., Bjork, E. L., &Bjork, R. A. (2000). Retrieval-induced forgetting: Evidence for a recall-specific mechanism.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,7, 522–550.
Corbetta, M., Miezin, F. M., Dobmeyer, S., Shulman, G. L., &Petersen, S. E. (1991). Selective and divided attention during visual discrimination of shape, color, and speed: Functional anatomy by Positron Emission Tomography.Journal of Neuroscience,11, 2383–2404.
Goschke, T. (2000). Intentional reconfiguration and involuntary persistence in task-set switching. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.),Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 331–355). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Dehaene, S., Kerszeberg, M., &Changeux, J. A. (1998). A neuronal model of global workspace in effortful cognitive tasks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,95, 14529–14534.
Houghton, G., &Tipper, S. P. (1994). A model of inhibitory mechanisms in selective attention. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.),Inhibitory mechanism in attention, memory, and language (pp. 53–112). San Diego: Academic Press.
Just, M. A., &Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension and individual differences in working memory.Psychological Review,99, 122–149.
Kahneman, D., &Tversky, A. (1972). Subjective probability: A judgement of representativeness.Cognitive Psychology,3, 430–454.
Kane, M. J., May, C. P., Hasher, L., &Rahal, T. (1997). Dual mechanisms of negative priming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,23, 632–650.
Kimberg, D. Y., &Farah, M. J. (1993). A unified account of cognitive impairments following frontal lobe damage: The role of working memory in complex, organized behavior.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,122, 411–428.
Logan, G. (1978). Attention in character-classification tasks: Evidence for the automaticity of component stages.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,107, 32–63.
Mayr, U. (2001). Age differences in the selection of mental sets: The role of inhibition, stimulus ambiguity, and response-set overlap.Psychology & Aging,16, 96–109.
Mayr, U., &Keele, S. W. (2000). Changing internal constraints on action: The role of backward inhibition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,129, 4–26.
Mayr, U., &Kliegl, R. (2000). Task-set switching and long-term memory retrieval.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 1124–1140.
Meiran, N. (1996). Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 1423–1442.
Neill, W. T. (1997). Episodic retrieval in negative priming and repetition priming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 1291–1305.
Quinlan, P. T. (1999). Sequential effects in auditory choice reaction time tasks.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,6, 297–303.
Rogers, R. D., &Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,124, 207–231.
Rubinstein, J. S., Meyer, D. E., &Evans, J. E. (2001). Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,27, 763–797.
Shallice, T. (1994). Multiple levels of control processes. In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitsch (Eds.),Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 395–420). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Tipper, S. P., &Cranston, M. (1985). Selective attention and priming: Inhibitory and facilitatory effects of ignored primes.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,37, 591–611.
Woodworth, R. S. (1938).Experimental Psychology. New York: Holt.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was funded through the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Grant INK 12/A1, Project C).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mayr, U. Inhibition of action rules. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 9, 93–99 (2002). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196261
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196261