Abstract
High levels of false recognition are observed after people study lists of semantic associates that all converge on a nonpresented lure word. In previous experiments, we have found that orienting participants to encode distinctive information about study list items by presenting them as pictures as opposed to words produces marked reductions in false recognition. We have suggested that these reductions reflect the operation of a distinctiveness heuristic: Participants demand access to detailed pictorial information in order to support a positive recognition decision. The present experiments provide additional evidence on this point and allow us to distinguish between the distinctiveness heuristic account and an alternative account based on the impoverished encoding of relational information that occurs when one is studying pictures. In Experiment 1, even when only half of the items in a study list were presented as pictures, a general suppression of false recognition was observed that could be attributable to impoverished encoding of relational information. Experiment 2 provided a critical test of the distinctiveness heuristic account: We manipulated test instructions and found that differences in false recognition rates between picture and word encoding were attenuated in a retrieval condition that did not encourage reliance on a distinctiveness heuristic.
Article PDF
References
Brainerd, C. J., &Reyna, V. F. (1998). When things that never happened are easier to “remember” than things that did.Psychological Science,9, 484–489.
Brewer, W. F., &Treyens, J. C. (1981). Role of schemata in memory for places.Cognitive Psychology,13, 207–230.
Brown, J., Lewis, V. J., &Monk, A. F. (1977). Memorability, word frequency and negative recognition.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,29, 461–473.
Deese, J. (1959). On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology,58, 17–22.
Dodson, C. S., &Schacter, D. L. (2001). “If I had said it I would have remembered it”: Reducing false memories with a distinctiveness heuristic.Psychological Bulletin & Review,8, 155–161.
Dodson, C. S., & Schacter, D. L. (in press). When false recognition meets metacognition: The distinctiveness heuristic.Journal of Memory & Language.
Hintzman, D. L. (1988). Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model.Psychological Review,95, 528–551.
Hunt, R. R., &McDaniel, M. A. (1993). The enigma of organization and distinctiveness.Journal of Memory & Language,32, 421–445.
Israel, L., &Schacter, D. L. (1997). Pictorial encoding reduces false recognition of semantic associates.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,4, 577–581.
Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., &Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring.Psychological Bulletin,114, 3–28.
Koutstaal, W., &Schacter, D. L. (1997). Gist-based false recognition of pictures in older and younger adults.Journal of Memory & Language,37, 555–583.
Marsh, R. L., &Hicks, J. L. (1998). Test formats change sourcemonitoring decision processes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 1137–1151.
Miller, M. B., &Wolford, G. L. (1999). The role of criterion shift in false memory.Psychological Review,106, 398–405.
Payne, D.G., Elie, C. J., Blackwell, J.M., &Neuschatz, J. S. (1996). Memory illusions: Recalling, recognizing, and recollecting events that never occurred.Journal of Memory & Language,35, 261–285.
Roediger, H. L., III, &McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 803–814.
Roediger, H. L., III, &McDermott, K. B. (1999). False alarms about false memories.Psychological Review,106, 406–410.
Rotello, C.M. (1999). Metacognition and memory for nonoccurrence.Memory,7, 43–63.
Russell, W.A., & Jenkins, J. J. (1954).The complete Minnesota norms for responses to 100 words from the Kent-Rosonoff Word Association Test (Tech. Rep. No. 11, Contract N8 ONR 66216). University of Minnesota.
Schacter, D. L. (2001).The seven sins of memory: How the mind forgets and remembers. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Schacter, D. L., Israel, L., &Racine, C. (1999). Suppressing false recognition in younger and older adults: The distinctiveness heuristic.Journal of Memory & Language,40, 1–24.
Schacter, D. L., Norman, K. A., &Koutstaal, W. (1998). The cognitive neuroscience of constructive memory.Annual Review of Psychology,49, 289–318.
Schacter, D. L., Verfaellie, M., &Anes, M. D. (1997). Illusory memories in amnesic patients: Conceptual and perceptual false recognition.Neuropsychology,11, 331–342.
Schacter, D. L., Verfaellie, M., &Pradere D. (1996). The neuropsychology of memory illusions: False recall and recognition in amnesic patients.Journal of Memory & Language,35, 319–334.
Shiffrin, R., Huber, D. E., &Marinelli, K. (1995). Effects of category length and strength on familiarity in recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 267–287.
Smith, R. E., &Hunt, R. R. (1998). Presentation modality affects false memory.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,5, 710–715.
Strack, F., &Bless, H. (1994). Memory for nonoccurrence: Metacognitive and prepositional strategies.Journal of Memory & Language,33, 203–217.
Underwood, B. J. (1965). False recognition produced by implicit verbal responses.Journal of Experimental Psychology,70, 122–129.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The second experiment was based on a senior thesis carried out by the second author under the supervision of the first author. Both experiments were supported by National Institute on Aging Grant AG08441 and the Harvard College Research Fund.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schacter, D.L., Cendan, D.L., Dodson, C.S. et al. Retrieval conditions and false recognition: Testing the distinctiveness heuristic. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 8, 827–833 (2001). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196224
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196224