Abstract
We measured the extent of amodal completion as a function of stimulus duration over the range of 15–210 msec, for both moving and stationary stimuli. Completion was assessed using a performancebased measure: a shape discrimination task that is easy if the stimulus is amodally completed and difficult if it is not. Specifically, participants judged whether an upright rectangle was longer horizontally or vertically, when the rectangle was unoccluded, occluded at its corners by four negative-contrast squares, or occluded at its corners by four zero-contrast squares. In the zero-contrast condition, amodal completion did not occur because there were no occlusion cues; in the unoccluded condition, the entire figure was present. Thus, comparing performance in the negative-contrast condition to these two extremes provided a quantitative measure of amodal completion. This measure revealed a rapid but measurable time course for amodal completion. Moving and stationary stimuli took the same amount of time to be completed (≈ 75 msec), but moving stimuli had slightly stronger completion at long durations.
Article PDF
References
Baylis, G. C., &Driver, J. (1993). Visual attention and objects: Evidence for hierarchical coding of location.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,19, 451–470.
Behrmann, M., Zemel, R. S., &Mozer, M. C. (1998). Object-based attention and occlusion: Evidence from normal participants and a computational model.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 1011–1036.
Beller, H. K. (1971). Priming: Effects of advance information on matching.Journal of Experimental Psychology,87, 176–182.
Bruno, N., Bertamini, M., &Domini, F. (1997). Amodal completion of partly occluded surfaces: Is there a mosaic stage?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,23, 1412–1426.
Duncan, J. (1984). Selective attention and the organization of visual information.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,113, 501–517.
Gerbino, W., &Salmaso, D. (1985). Un’analisi processuale del completamento amodale [A rigorous analysis of amodal completion].Giornale Italiano di Psicologia,12, 97–121.
Guttman, S., & Sekuler, A. B. (2001).Visual completion: Spatial and temporal limits. Manuscript submitted for publication.
He, Z. J., &Nakayama, K. (1992). Surfaces versus features in visual search.Nature,359, 231–233.
He, Z. J., &Nakayama, K. (1994). Perceiving textures: Beyond filtering.Vision Research,34, 151–162.
Helmholtz, H. von (1962).Treatise on physiological optics (3rd ed.; J. P. C. Southall, Trans.). New York: Dover. (Original work published 1910)
Kanizsa, G. (1979).Organization in vision: Essays on Gestalt perception. New York: Praeger.
Kanizsa, G., &Gerbino, W. (1982). Amodal completion: Seeing or thinking? In J. Beck (Ed.),Organization and representation in perception (pp. 167–190). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kellman, P. J., &Shipley, T. F. (1991). A theory of visual interpolation in object perception.Cognitive Psychology,23, 141–221.
Kellman, P. J., &Spelke, E. S. (1983). Perception of partly occluded objects in infancy.Cognitive Psychology,15, 483–524.
Lorenceau, J., &Shiffrar, M. (1992). The influence of terminators on motion integration across space.Vision Research,32, 263–273.
Meyer, G. E., &Dougherty, T. J. (1990). Ambiguous fluidity and rigidity and diamonds that ooze.Perception,19, 491–496.
Michotte, A., Thinès, G., Costall, A., &Butterworth, G. (1991).Michotte’s experimental phenomenology of perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Nakayama, K., Shimojo, S., &Silverman, G.H. (1989). Stereoscopic depth: Its relation to image segmentation, grouping and the recognition of occluded objects.Perception,18, 55–68.
Ratoosh, P. (1949). On interposition as a cue for the perception of distance.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,35, 257–259.
Regan, D., &Hamstra, S. J. (1992). Shape discrimination and the judgement of perfect symmetry: Dissociation of shape from size.Vision Research,32, 1845–1864.
Rensink, R. A., &Enns, J. T. (1995). Preemption effects in visual search: Evidence for low-level grouping.Psychological Review,102, 101–130.
Rensink, R.A., &Enns, J. T. (1998). Early completion of occluded objects.Vision Research,38, 2489–2505.
Ringach, D. L., &Shapley, R. (1996). Spatial and temporal properties of illusory contours and amodal boundary completion.Vision Research,36, 3037–3050.
Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive representations of semantic categories.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,104, 192–233.
Sekuler, A. B. (1994). Local and global minima in visual completion: Effects of symmetry and orientation.Perception,23, 529–545.
Sekuler, A. B., &Palmer, S. E. (1992). Perception of partly occluded objects: A microgenetic analysis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,121, 95–111.
Sekuler, A. B., Palmer, S. E., &Flynn, C. (1994). Local and global processes in visual completion.Psychological Science,5, 260–267.
Shore, D. I., &Enns, J. T. (1997). Shape completion time depends on the size of the occluded region.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,23, 980–998.
Snowden, R. J., &Braddick, O. J. (1989). The combination of motion signals over time.Vision Research,29, 1621–1630.
Stone, L. S., Beutter, B. R., &Lorenceau, J. (2000). Visual motion integration for perception and pursuit.Perception,29, 771–787.
Uttal, W. R., Spillmann, L., Stürzel, F., &Sekuler, A. B. (2000). Motion and shape in common fate.Vision Research,40, 301–310.
Watamaniuk, S. N. (1993). Ideal observer for discrimination of the global direction of dynamic random-dot stimuli.Journal of the Optical Society of America A,10, 16–28.
Watamaniuk, S. N., Sekuler, R., &Williams, D.W. (1989). Direction perception in complex dynamic displays: The integration of direction information.Vision Research,29, 47–59.
Wertheimer, M. (1955). Laws of organization in perceptual forms. In W. D. Ellis (Ed.),A source book of Gestalt psychology (pp. 71–88). New York: Humanities Press. (Original work published 1923)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by NSERC Grants OGP0105494 and OGP0042133.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Murray, R.F., Sekuler, A.B. & Bennett, P.J. Time course of amodal completion revealed by a shape discrimination task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 8, 713–720 (2001). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196208
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196208