Abstract
Divided attention at encoding is well known to have adverse effects on episodic memory performance (e.g., Naveh-Benjamin & Greg, 2000). This article attempts to determine whether these effects are a result of the interruption of encoding of associative information among the components of an episode. Five experiments, using different types of episodes and episodes components, were conducted. Participants studied information under either full or divided attention and were then tested on their memory for both the episodes’ components and the associations between them. Divided attention did not produce a differential deficit in memory for associative information; memory for the components suffered to the same degree as memory for the associations among the components. The cause of the divided-attention effect at encoding lies somewhere other than in the associative processes that are engaged.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, J. R., &Bower, G. H. (1973).Human associative memory. Washington, DC: V. H. Winston & Sons.
Anderson, N. D., Iidaka, T., Cabeza, R., Kapur, S., McIntosh, A. R., &Craik, F. I.M. (2000). The effects of divided attention on encoding-and retrieval-related brain activity: A PET study of younger and older adults.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,12, 775–792.
Atkinson, R. C., &Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K.W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds.),The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 2, pp. 89–105). New York: Academic Press.
Baddeley, A. D., Lewis, V., Eldridge, M., &Thomson, N. (1984). Attention and retrieval from long-term memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,13, 518–540.
Balgur, R. (1968).List of basic words for school. Tel Aviv: Otsar Hamoreh.
Chalfonte, B. L., &Johnson, M. K. (1996). Feature memory and binding in young and older adults.Memory & Cognition,24, 403–416.
Clark, S. E. (1992). Word frequency effects in associative and item recognition.Memory & Cognition,20, 231–243.
Cooper, E. E., &Wojan, T. J. (2000). Differences in the coding of spatial relations in face identification and basic-level object recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 470–488.
Craik, F. I. M. (1982). Selective changes in encoding as a function of reduced processing capacity. In F. Klix, J. Hoffman, & E. Van der Meer (Eds.),Cognitive research in psychology (pp. 152–161). Berlin: DVW.
Craik, F. I. M. (1983). On the transfer of information from temporary to permanent memory.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Series B,302, 341–359.
Craik, F. I. M. (1986). A functional account of age differences in memory. In F. Klix & H. Hagendorf (Eds.),Human memory and cognitive capabilities, mechanisms, and performance (pp. 409–422). Amsterdam: Elsevier, North-Holland.
Craik, F. I. M., &Byrd, M. (1982). Aging and cognitive deficits: The role of attentional resources. In F. I.M. Craik and S. E. Trehub (Eds.),Aging and cognitive processes (pp. 191–211). New York: Plenum.
Craik, F. I. M., Govoni, R., Naveh-Benjamin, M., &Anderson, N. D. (1996). The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,125, 159–180.
Craik, F. I. M., &Kester, J. D. (2000). Divided attention and memory: Impairment of processing or consolidation? In E. Tulving (Ed.),Memory, consciousness, and brain: The Tallinn conference (pp. 38–51). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
Craik, F. I. M., &McDowd, J. M. (1987). Age differences in recall and recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 474–479.
Craik, F. I. M., &Simon, E. (1980). Age differences in memory: The roles of attention and depth of processing. In L.W. Poon, J. L. Fozard, L. S. Cermak, D. Arenberg, & L.W. Thomson (Eds.),New directions in memory and aging (pp. 95–112). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Dosher, B. A. (1988).Retrieval dynamics of item and associative information. Unpublished manuscript.
Fletcher, P. C., Frith, C. D., Grasby, P. M., Shallice, T., Frackowiak, R. S., &Dulan, R. J. (1995). Brain systems for encoding and retrieval of auditory-verbal memory: An in vivo study in humans.Brain,118, 401–416.
Gillund, G., &Shiffrin, R. M. (1984). A retrieval model for both recognition and recall.Psychological Review,91, 1–67.
Gronlund, S. D., &Ratcliff, R. (1989). Time course of item and associative information: Implications for global memory models.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 846–858.
Hashtroudi, S., Johnson, M. K., &Chrosniak, L. D. (1990). Aging and qualitative characteristics of memories for perceived and imagined complex events.Psychology & Aging,5, 119–126.
Henik, A., &Kaplan, L. (1988). Categories content: Findings regarding Hebrew categories and comparison to US findings.Psychology,1, 104–112.
Hess, T. M., Donley, J., &Vandermaas, M. O. (1989). Aging-related changes in the processing and retention of script information.Experimental Aging Research,15, 89–96.
Hockley, W. E. (1991). Recognition memory for item and associative information: A comparison of forgetting rates. In W. E. Hockley & S. Lewandowsky (Eds.),Relating theory and data: Essays on human-memory in honor of Bennet B. Murdock (pp. 227–248). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Hockley, W. E. (1992). Item versus associative information: Further comparisons of forgetting rates.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 1321–1330.
Hockley, W. E. (1994). Reflections of the mirror effect for item and associative recognition.Memory & Cognition,22, 713–722.
Hockley, W. E., &Christi, C. (1996). Tests of encoding trade-offs between item and associative information.Memory & Cognition,24, 202–216.
Humphreys, M. S. (1976). Relational information and the context effect in recognition memory.Memory & Cognition,4, 221–232.
Johnson, M. K. (1992). MEM: Mechanisms of recollection.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,4, 268–280.
Johnson, M. K., &Chalfonte, B. L. (1994). Binding complex memories: The role of reactivation and the hippocampus. In D. L. Schacter & E. Tulving (Eds.),Memory systems 1994 (pp. 311–350). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kapur, S., Craik, F. I. M., Tulving, E., Wilson, A. A., Houle, S., &Brown, G. M. (1994). Neuroanatomical correlates of encoding in episodic memory: Levels of processing effect.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,91, 2008–2011.
Mandler, G. (1979). Organization and repetition: Organizational principles with special reference to role learning. In L.-G. Nilsson (Ed.),Perspectives on memory research: Essays in honor of Uppsala University’s 500th anniversary (pp. 293–328). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Murdock, B. B., Jr. (1965). Effects of a subsidiary task on short-term memory.British Journal of Psychology,56, 413–419.
Murdock, B. B., Jr. (1982). A theory of storage and retrieval of item and associative information.Psychological Review,89, 609–626.
Murdock, B. B. (1993). TODAM2: A model for the storage and retrieval of item, associative, and serial-order information.Psychological Review,100, 183–203.
Naveh-Benjamin, M. (1987). Coding of spatial location information: An automatic process?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 595–605.
Naveh-Benjamin, M. (1988). Recognition of spatial location information: Another failure to support automaticity.Memory & Cognition,16, 437–445.
Naveh-Benjamin, M. (1990). Coding of temporal order information: An automatic process? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 117–126.
Naveh-Benjamin, M. (2000). Adult-age differences in memory performance: Tests of an associative deficit hypothesis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 1170–1187.
Naveh-Benjamin, M. (2002). The effects of divided attention on encoding processes: Underlying mechanisms. In M. Naveh-Benjamin, M. Moscovitch, & H. L. Roediger III (Eds.),Perspectives on human memory and cognitive aging: Essays in honor of Fergus Craik (pp. 193–207). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
Naveh-Benjamin, M., &Craik, F. I. M. (1998). Presenting and analyzing results in aging research.Experimental Aging Research,24, 83–98.
Naveh-Benjamin, M., Craik, F. I. M, Gavrilescu, D., &Anderson, N. D. (2000). Asymmetry between encoding and retrieval processes: Evidence from a divided attention paradigm and a calibration analysis.Memory & Cognition,28, 965–976.
Naveh-Benjamin, M., Craik, F. I. M., Guez, J., &Dori, H. (1998). Effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory: Further support for an asymmetry.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 1091–1104.
Naveh-Benjamin, M., Craik, F. I. M., Perretta, J. G., &Tonev, S. T. (2000). The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes: The resiliency of retrieval processes.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,53A, 609–625.
Naveh-Benjamin, M., &Guez, J. (2000). Effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes: Assessment of attentional costs and a componential analysis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 1461–1482.
Naveh-Benjamin, M., Hussain, Z., Guez, J., &Bar-On, M. (2003). Adult-age differences in memory performance: Further support for an associative deficit hypothesis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,29, 826–837.
Naveh-Benjamin, M., &Jonides, J. (1986). On the automaticity of frequency coding: Effects of competing task load, encoding strategy, and intention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,12, 378–386.
Rabinowitz, J. C., Craik, F. I. M., &Ackerman, B. P. (1982). A processing resource account of age differences in recall.Canadian Journal of Psychology,36, 325–344.
Reinitz, M. T., Morrissey, J., &Demb, J. (1994). Role of attention in face encoding.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 161–168.
Salthouse, T. A. (1991).Theoretical perspectives on cognitive aging. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Tanaka, J. W., &Sengco, J. A. (1997). Features and their configuration in face recognition.Memory & Cognition,25, 583–592.
Underwood, B. J. (1969). Attributes of memory.Psychological Review,76, 559–573.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported in part by a grant from the Ben-Gurion University Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences as well as a grant from the Zlotowski Center for the Neurosciences.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Naveh-Benjamin, M., Guez, J. & Marom, M. The effects of divided attention at encoding on item and associative memory. Memory & Cognition 31, 1021–1035 (2003). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196123
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196123