Abstract
We present findings suggesting that analogical inference processes can play a role in fluent comprehension and interpretation. Participants were found to use information from a prior relationally similar example in understanding the content of a later example, but they reported that they were not aware of having done so. These inference processes were sensitive to structural mappings between the two instances, ruling out explanations based solely on more general kinds of activation, such as priming. Reading speed measures were consistent with the possibility that these inferences had taken place during encoding of the target rather than during the later recognition test. These findings suggest that analogical mapping, though often viewed as an explicit deliberative process, can sometimes operate without intent or even awareness.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, R. C. (1984). Some reflections on the acquisition of knowledge.Educational Researcher,13, 5–10.
Anderson, R. C., Reynolds, R. E., Schallert, D. L., &Goetz, E. T. (1977). Frameworks for comprehending discourse.American Educational Research Journal,14, 367–381.
Anderson, R. C., Spiro, R. J., &Anderson, M. C. (1978). Schemata as scaffolding for the representation of information in connected discourse.American Educational Research Journal,15, 433–440.
Blanchette, I., &Dunbar, K. (2002). Representational change and analogy: How analogical inferences alter representations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,28, 672–685.
Bowdle, B. F., &Gentner, D. (1997). Informativity and asymmetry in comparisons.Cognitive Psychology,34, 244–286.
Bowdle, B. F., &Gentner, D. (2005). The career of metaphor.Psychological Review,112, 193–216.
Bransford, J. D., &Johnson, M. K. (1972). Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,11, 717–726.
Catrambone, R. (2002). The effects of surface and structural feature matches on the access of story analogs.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,28, 318–334.
Catrambone, R., &Holyoak, K. J. (1989). Overcoming contextual limitations on problem-solving transfer.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 1147–1156.
Cheng, P. W., &Holyoak, K. J. (1985). Pragmatic reasoning schemas.Cognitive Psychology,17, 391–416.
Clement, C. A., &Gentner, D. (1991). Systematicity as a selection constraint in analogical mapping.Cognitive Science,15, 89–132.
Dunbar, K. (1995). How scientists really reason: Scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.),The nature of insight (pp. 365–395). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Dunbar, K. (1999). How scientists build models: InVivo Science as a window on the scientific mind. In L. Magnani, N. J. Nersessian, & P. Thagard (Eds.),Model-based reasoning in scientific discovery (pp. 85–99). New York: Kluwer.
Forbus, K. D., Gentner, D., &Law, K. (1995). MAC/FAC: A model of similarity-based retrieval.Cognitive Science,19, 141–205.
Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy.Cognitive Science,7, 155–170.
Gentner, D. (2002). Analogy in scientific discovery: The case of Johannes Kepler. In L. Magnani & N. J. Nersessian (Eds.),Model-based reasoning: Science, technology, values (pp. 21–39). New York: Kluwer.
Gentner, D. (2003). Analogical reasoning, psychology of. In L. Nadel (Ed.),Encyclopedia of cognitive science (Vol. 1, pp. 106–112). London: Nature Publishing.
Gentner, D., Holyoak, K. J., &Kokinov, B. N. (Eds.) (2001).The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gentner, D., &Landers, R. (1985). Analogical reminding: A good match is hard to find. InProceedings of the International Conference on Cybernetics and Society (pp. 607–613). New York: IEEE Press.
Gentner, D., Loewenstein, J., &Thompson, L. (2003). Learning and transfer: A general role for analogical encoding.Journal of Educational Psychology,95, 393–405.
Gentner, D., &Markman, A. B. (1997). Structure mapping in analogy and similarity.American Psychologist,52, 45–56.
Gentner, D., &Medina, J. (1998). Similarity and the development of rules.Cognition,65, 263–297.
Gentner, D., Rattermann, M. J., &Forbus, K. D. (1993). The roles of similarity in transfer: Separating retrievability from inferential soundness.Cognitive Psychology,25, 524–575.
Gick, M. L., &Holyoak, K. J. (1980). Analogical problem solving.Cognitive Psychology,12, 306–355.
Gick, M. L., &Holyoak, K. J. (1983). Schema induction and analogical transfer.Cognitive Psychology,15, 1–38.
Gillund, G., &Shiffrin, R. M. (1984). A retrieval model for both recognition and recall.Psychological Review,91, 1–67.
Glenberg, A. M., Meyer, M., &Lindem, K. (1987). Mental models contribute to foregrounding during text comprehension.Journal of Memory & Language,26, 69–83.
Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., &Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension.Psychological Review,101, 371–395.
Hintzman, D. L. (1986). Schema “abstraction” in a multiple-trace memory model.Psychological Review,93, 411–428.
Holyoak, K. J., &Koh, K. (1987). Surface and structural similarity in analogical transfer.Memory & Cognition,15, 332–340.
Holyoak, K. J., &Thagard, P. (1989). Analogical mapping by constraint satisfaction.Cognitive Science,13, 295–355.
Holyoak, K. J., &Thagard, P. (1995).Mental leaps: Analogy in creative thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hummel, J. E., &Holyoak, K. J. (1997). Distributed representations of structure: A theory of analogical access and mapping.Psychological Review,104, 427–466.
Keane, M. T. (1988).Analogical problem solving. New York: Wiley.
Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model.Psychological Review,95, 163–182.
Kokinov, B., &French, R. M. (2003). Computational models of analogy making. In L. Nadel (Ed.),Encyclopedia of cognitive science (Vol. 1, pp. 113–118). London: Nature Publishing.
Loewenstein, J., Thompson, L., &Gentner, D. (1999). Analogical encoding facilitates knowledge transfer in negotiation.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,6, 586–597.
Loewenstein, J., Thompson, L., &Gentner, D. (2003). Analogical learning in negotiation teams: Comparing cases promotes learning and transfer.Academy of Management Learning & Education,2, 119–127.
Markman, A. B. (1997). Constraints on analogical inference.Cognitive Science,21, 373–418.
Medin, D. L., &Ross, B. H. (1989). The specific character of abstract thought: Categorization, problem solving, and induction. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.),Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 5, pp. 189–223). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Moreau, C. P., Markman, A. B., &Lehmann, D. R. (2001). “What is it?” Categorization flexibility and consumers’ responses to really new products.Journal of Consumer Research,27, 489–498.
Novick, L. R. (1988). Analogical transfer, problem similarity, and expertise.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,14, 510–520.
O’Brien, E. J. (1995). Automatic components of discourse comprehension. In R. F. Lorch, Jr. & E. J. O’Brien (Eds.),Sources of coherence in reading (pp. 159–176). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Perrott, D. A., Gentner, D., &Bodenhausen, G. V. (2005). Resistance is futile: The unwitting insertion of analogical inferences in memory.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,12, 696–702.
Ratcliff, R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval.Psychological Review,85, 59–108.
Ross, B. H. (1984). Remindings and their effects in learning a cognitive skill.Cognitive Psychology,16, 371–416.
Ross, B. H. (1987). This is like that: The use of earlier problems and the separation of similarity effects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 629–639.
Ross, B. H. (1989). Remindings in learning and instruction. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.),Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 438–469). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ross, B. H., &Bradshaw, G. L. (1994). Encoding effects of remindings.Memory & Cognition,22, 591–605.
Rumelhart, D. E., &Ortony, A. (1977). The representation of knowledge in memory. In R. C. Anderson, R. J. Spiro, & W. E. Montague (Eds.),Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge (pp. 99–135). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Spellman, B. A., &Holyoak, K. J. (1996). Pragmatics in analogical mapping.Cognitive Psychology,31, 307–346.
Steffensen, M. S., Joag-Dev, C., &Anderson, R. C. (1979). A cross-cultural perspective on reading comprehension.Reading Research Quarterly,15, 10–29.
Thagard, P. (1992).Conceptual revolutions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Wharton, C. M., Holyoak, K. J., &Lange, T. E. (1996). Remote analogical reminding.Memory & Cognition,24, 629–643.
Wolff, P., &Gentner, D. (2000). Evidence for role-neutral initial processing of metaphors.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 529–541.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by ONR Grant N00014-02-1-0078 awarded to the second author. We thank Doug Medin, Mark Jung-Beeman, Jason Jameson, and the Language & Cognition lab group for comments and suggestions.
Note—This article was accepted by the previous editorial team, when Colin M. MacLeod was Editor.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Day, S.B., Gentner, D. Nonintentional analogical inference in text comprehension. Memory & Cognition 35, 39–49 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195940
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195940