Abstract
Many researchers consider costs in shifting attention and mental set to reflect a basic ability to use top-down goal information to guide action. Although switch costs have been used as measures of individuals’ executive function, whether common abilities underlie task set switching across different types of shifting tasks has not been well studied. In 249 participants, we studied whether switch costs in a novel two-choice reaction time task were correlated across variations in two variables: the locus of representation (stimuli were either perceptually available or stored in working memory [WM]) and which of two judgment tasks was performed. Switch costs were asymmetrical, in that it was easier to switch to the easier judgment, and were related to overall and relative processing speed: Switch costs were higher when the task was more difficult. These factors should be accounted for when one is measuring individual differences in switch costs. After controlling for these effects, we found evidence for a common ability underlying switch costs that involved both task set preparation and response selection; however,residual shift costs, which involve only response selection, were uncorrelated across tasks. Correlations among switch costs were substantially higher within task type (e.g., correlations of WM shifting tasks with other WM shifting tasks and of perceptual tasks with perceptual ones), suggesting that there are also processes unique to switching within WM and switching among visible stimuli.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allport, D. A., Styles, E. A., &Hsieh, S. (1994). Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.),Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 421–452). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Bradford Books.
Allport, [D.] A., &Wylie, G. (1999). Task-switching: Positive and negative priming of task-set. In G. W. Humphreys, J. Duncan, & A. Treisman (Eds.),Attention, space, and action: Studies in cognitive neuroscience (pp. 273–296). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Baddeley, A. (1992). Working memory.Science,255, 556–559.
Bleckley, M., Durso, F. T., Crutchfield, J. M., Engle, R. W., &Khanna, M. M. (2003). Individual differences in working memory capacity predict visual attention allocation.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,10, 884–889.
Burgess, P. W., Alderman, N., Evans, J., Emslie, H., &Wilson, B. A. (1998). The ecological validity of tests of executive function.Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society,4, 547–558.
Conway, A. R. A., Kane, M. J., &Engle, R. W. (2003). Working memory capacity and its relation to general intelligence.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,7, 547–552.
Coull, J. T., Frith, C. D., Büchel, C., &Nobre, A. C. (2000). Orienting attention in time: Behavioural and neuroanatomical distinction between exogenous and endogenous shifts.Neuropsychologia,38, 808–819.
Derrfuss, J., Brass, M., Neumann, J., &von Cramon, D. Y. (2005). Involvement of the inferior frontal junction in cognitive control: Metaanalyses of switching and Stroop studies.Human Brain Mapping,25, 22–34.
Downing, P., Liu, J., &Kanwisher, N. (2001). Testing cognitive models of visual attention with fMRI and MEG.Neuropsychologia,39, 1329–1342.
Dreher, J. C., Koechlin, E., Ali, S. O., &Grafman, J. (2002). The roles of timing and task order during task switching.NeuroImage,17, 95–109.
Driver, J. (1996). Attention and segmentation.The Psychologist,9, 119–123.
Duncan, J., Emslie, H., Williams, P., Johnson, R., &Freer, C. (1996). Intelligence and the frontal lobe: The organization of goaldirected behavior.Cognitive Psychology,30, 257–303.
Duncan, J., Johnson, R., Swales, M., &Freer, C. (1997). Frontal lobe deficits after head injury: Unity and diversity of function.Cognitive Neuropsychology,14, 713–741.
Dyer, F. N. (1973). The Stroop phenomenon and its use in the study of perceptual, cognitive, and response processes.Memory & Cognition,1, 106–120.
Egly, R., Driver, J., &Rafal, R. D. (1994). Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: Evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,123, 161–177.
Garavan, H. (1998). Serial attention within working memory.Memory & Cognition,26, 263–276.
Garavan, H., Ross, T. J., Li, S.-J., &Stein, E. A. (2000). A parametric manipulation of central executive functioning.Cerebral Cortex,10, 585–592.
Gilbert, S. J., &Shallice, T. (2002). Task switching: A PDP model.Cognitive Psychology,44, 297–337.
Gopher, D. (1996). Attention control: Explorations of the work of an executive controller.Cognitive Brain Research,5, 23–38.
Gopher, D., Armony, L., &Greenshpan, Y. (2000). Switching tasks and attention policies.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,129, 308–339.
Hitch, G. J., &Baddeley, A. D. (1976). Verbal reasoning and working memory.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,28, 603–621.
Hsieh, S., &Allport, A. (1994). Shifting attention in a rapid visual search paradigm.Perceptual & Motor Skills,79, 315–335.
Jersild, A. (1927). Mental set and shift.Archives of Psychology, Whole No. 89, 5–82.
Johnson, R. A., &Wichern, D. W. (2002).Applied multivariate statistical analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Kane, M. J., &Engle, R. W. (2003). Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: The contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,132, 47–70.
Kane, M. J., Hambrick, D. Z., Tuholski, S. W., Wilhelm, O., Payne, T. W., &Engle, R. W. (2004). The generality of working memory capacity: A latent-variable approach to verbal and visuospatial memory span and reasoning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,133, 189–217.
Kimberg, D. Y., Aguirre, G. K., &D’Esposito, M. (2000). Modulation of task-related neural activity in task-switching: An fMRI study.Cognitive Brain Research,10, 189–196.
Koch, I. (2003). The role of external cues for endogenous advance reconfiguration in task switching.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,10, 488–492.
Lamy, D., &Egeth, H. (2002). Object-based selection: The role of attentional shifts.Perception & Psychophysics,64, 52–66.
Macaluso, E., Frith, C. D., &Driver, J. (2002). Directing attention to locations and to sensory modalities: Multiple levels of selective processing revealed with PET.Cerebral Cortex,12, 357–368.
MacLeod, C. M., &Dunbar, K. (1988). Training and Stroop-like interference: Evidence for a continuum of automaticity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,14, 126–135.
Mayr, U. (2003). Towards principles of executive control: How mental sets are selected. In R. H. Kluwe, G. Lüer, & F. Rösler (Eds.),Principles of learning and memory (pp. 223–241). Basel: Birkhäuser.
Mayr, U., &Kliegl, R. (2000). Task-set switching and long-term memory retrieval.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 1124–1140.
Meiran, N. (1996). Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 1423–1442.
Meiran, N., Chorev, Z., &Sapir, A. (2000). Component processes in task switching.Cognitive Psychology,41, 211–253.
Meiran, N., Hommel, B., Bibi, U., &Lev, I. (2002). Consciousness and control in task switching.Consciousness & Cognition,11, 10–33.
Miller, E. K., &Cohen, J. D. (2001). An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function.Annual Review of Neuroscience,24, 167–202.
Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., &Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis.Cognitive Psychology,41, 49–100.
Monsell, S., Yeung, N., &Azuma, R. (2000). Reconfiguration of task-set: Is it easier to switch to the weaker task?Psychological Research,63, 250–264.
Norman, D. A., &Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behavior. In R. J. Davidson, G. E. Schwartz, & D. Shapiro (Eds.),Consciousness and self-regulation (Vol. 4, pp. 1–18). New York: Plenum.
O’Craven, K. M., Downing, P. E., &Kanwisher, N. (1999). fMRI evidence for objects as the units of attentional selection.Nature,401, 584–587.
Owen, A. M., Roberts, A. C., Polkey, C. E., Sahakian, B. J., &Robbins, T. W. (1991). Extra-dimensional versus intra-dimensional set shifting performance following frontal lobe excisions, temporal lobe excisions or amygdalo-hippocampectomy in man.Neuropsychologia,29, 993–1006.
Pachella, R. G. (1974). The interpretation of reaction time in information processing research. In B. H. Kantowitz (Ed.),Human information processing: Tutorials in performance and cognition (pp. 41–82). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rabbitt, P., &Lowe, C. (2000). Patterns of cognitive ageing.Psychological Research,63, 308–316.
Roberts, A. C., &Wallis, J. D. (2000). Inhibitory control and affective processing in the prefrontal cortex: Neuropsychological studies in the common marmoset.Cerebral Cortex,10, 252–262.
Rogers, R. D., &Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,124, 207–231.
Rousseeuw, P. J. (1984). Least median of squares regression.Journal of the American Statistical Association,79, 871–881.
Rubinstein, J. S., Meyer, D. E., &Evans, J. E. (2001). Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,27, 763–797.
Salthouse, T. A. (1996). The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition.Psychological Review,103, 403–428.
Salthouse, T. A., Fristoe, N., McGuthry, K. E., &Hambrick, D. Z. (1998). Relation of task switching to speed, age, and fluid intelligence.Psychology & Aging,13, 445–461.
Shafiullah, M., &Monsell, S. (1999). The cost of switching between Kanji and Kana while reading Japanese.Language & Cognitive Processes,14, 567–607.
Spector, A., &Biederman, I. (1976). Mental set and mental shift revisited.American Journal of Psychology,89, 669–679.
Steiger, J. H. (1980). Testing pattern hypotheses on correlation matrices: Alternative statistics and some empirical results.Multivariate Behavioral Research,15, 335–352.
Steiger, J. H. (2005). Comparing correlations: Pattern hypothesis tests between and/or within independent samples. In A. Maydeu-Olivares & J. J. McArdle (Eds.),Contemporary psychometrics: A festschrift for Roderick P. McDonald (pp. 377–414). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders’ method. In W. G. Koster (Ed.),Attention and performance II(pp. 276–315). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Sylvester, C. Y. C., Wager, T. D., Lacey, S. C., Hernandez, L., Nichols, T. E., Smith, E. E., &Jonides, J. (2003). Switching attention and resolving interference: fMRI measures of executive functions.Neuropsychologia,41, 357–370.
Vogel, E. K., Woodman, G. F., &Luck, S. J. (2001). Storage of features, conjunctions, and objects in visual working memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,27, 92–114.
Wager, T. D., Jonides, J., &Reading, S. (2004). Neuroimaging studies of shifting attention: A meta-analysis.NeuroImage,22, 1679–1693.
Wager, T. D., Jonides, J., Smith, E. E., &Nichols, T. E. (2005). Toward a taxonomy of attention shifting: Individual differences in fMRI during multiple shift types.Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience,5, 127–143.
Wager, T. D., &Smith, E. E. (2003). Neuroimaging studies of working memory: A meta-analysis.Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience,3, 255–274.
Ward, G., Roberts, M. J., &Phillips, L. H. (2001). Task-switching costs, Stroop-costs, and executive control: A correlational study.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,54A, 491–511.
Wylie, G., &Allport, A. (2000). Task switching and the measurement of “switch costs.”Psychological Research,63, 212–233.
Yeung, N., &Monsell, S. (2003a). The effects of recent practice on task switching.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,29, 919–936.
Yeung, N., &Monsell, S. (2003b). Switching between tasks of unequal familiarity: The role of stimulus-attribute and response-set selection.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,29, 455–469.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Note—This article was accepted by the previous editorial team, when Colin M. MacLeod was Editor.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wager, T.D., Jonides, J. & Smith, E.E. Individual differences in multiple types of shifting attention. Memory & Cognition 34, 1730–1743 (2006). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195934
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195934