Abstract
Numbers can be represented as Arabic digits (“6”) or as number words (“six”). The present study investigated potential processing differences between the two notational formats. In view of the previous finding (e.g., Potter & Faulconer, 1975) that objects are named slower, but semantically categorized faster, than corresponding words, it was investigated whether a similar interaction between stimulus format and task could be obtained with numbers. Experiment 1 established that number words were named faster than corresponding digits, but only if the two notation formats were presented in separate experimental blocks. Experiment 2 contrasted naming with a numerical magnitude judgment task and demonstrated an interaction between notation and task, with slower naming but faster magnitude judgment latencies for digits than for number words. These findings suggest that processing of the two notation formats is asymmetric, with digits gaining rapid access to numerical magnitude representations, but slower access to lexical codes, and the reverse for number words.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Besner, D., &Coltheart, M. (1979). Ideographic and alphabetic processing in skilled reading of English.Neuropsychologica,17, 467–472.
BROWN, W. (1915). Practice in associating color-names with colors.Psychological Review,22, 45–55.
Cattell, J. M. (1885). Uber die Zeit der Erkennung und Benennung von Schriftzeichen, Bildern und Farben [The time it takes to recognize and name letters, pictures, and colors].Philosophische Studien,2, 635–650.
Chainay,H., &Humphreys, G. W. (2002). Privileged access to action for objects relative to words.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,9, 348–355.
Cipolotti, L. (1995). Multiple routes for reading words, why not numbers? Evidence from a case of Arabic numeral dyslexia.Cognitive Neuropsychology,12, 313–342.
Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., &Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud.Psychological Review,108, 204–256.
Dehaene, S. (1992). Varieties of numerical abilities.Cognition,44, 1–42.
Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., &Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,122, 371–396.
Dehaene, S., &Cohen, L. (1995). Towards an anatomical and functional model of number processing.Mathematical Cognition,1, 83–120.
Dehaene, S., &Cohen, L. (1997). Cerebral pathways for calculation: Double dissociation between rote verbal and quantitative knowledge of arithmetic.Cortex,33, 219–250.
Dehaene, S., &Mehler, J. (1992). Cross-linguistic regularities in the frequency of number words.Cognition,43, 1–29.
Dehaene, S., Naccache, L., LeClec’H,G., Koechlin, E., Mueller, M., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., Van De Moortele, P.-F., &Le Bihan, D. (1998). Imaging unconscious semantic priming.Nature,395, 597–600.
Deloche, G., &Seron, X. (1987). Numerical transcoding: A general production model. In G. Deloche & X. Seron (Eds.),Mathematical disabilities: A cognitive neuropsychological perspective (pp. 137–170). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Ferrand, L. (1999). Why naming takes longer than reading? The special case of Arabic numbers.Acta Psychologica,100, 253–266.
Fias, W. (2001). Two routes for the processing of verbal numbers: Evidence from the SNARC effect.Psychological Research,65, 250–259.
Fias, W., Reynvoet, B., &Brysbaert, M. (2001). Are Arabic numerals processed as pictures in a Stroop interference task?Psychological Research,65, 242–249.
Foltz, G. S., Poltrock, S. E., &Potts, G. R. (1984). Mental comparison of size and magnitude: Size congruity effects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,10, 442–453.
Fraisse, P. (1960). Recognition time measured by verbal reaction to figures and words.Perceptual & Motor Skills,11, 204–211.
Glaser, W. R. (1992). Picture naming.Cognition,42, 61–105.
Glaser, W. R., &Dÿngelhoff, F.-J. (1984). The time course of picture-word interference.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human-Perception & Performance,10, 640–654.
Henik, A., &Tzelgov, J. (1982). Is three greater than five? The relation between physical and semantic size in comparison tasks.Memory & Cognition,10, 389–395.
Hino, Y., &Lupker, S. J. (1996). The effects of polysemy in lexical decision and naming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 1331–1356.
Hino, Y., Pexman, P. M., &Lupker, S. J. (2002). Ambiguity and synonymy effects in lexical decision, naming, and semantic categorization tasks: Interactions between orthography, phonology, and semantics.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,28, 686–713.
Holender, D., &Peereman, R. (1987). Differential processing of phonographic and logographic single-digit numbers by the two hemispheres. In G. Deloche & X. Seron (Eds.),Mathematical disabilities: A cognitive neuropsychological perspective (pp. 43–85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Humphreys, G. W., Price, C. J., &Riddoch, M. J. (1999). From objects to names: A cognitive neuroscience approach.Psychological Research,62, 118–130.
Irwin, D. I., &Lupker, S. J. (1983). Semantic priming of pictures and words: A levels of processing approach.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,22, 45–60.
Ito, Y., &Hatta, T. (2003). Semantic processing of Arabic, Kanji, and Kana numbers: Evidence from interference in physical and numerical size judgments.Memory & Cognition,31, 360–368.
Lupker, S. J., Brown, P., &Colombo, L. (1997). Strategic control in a naming task: Changing routes or changing deadlines?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 570–590.
Lupker, S. J., Kinoshita, S., Coltheart, M., &Taylor, T. E. (2003). Mixing costs and mixing benefits in naming words, pictures, nand sums.Journal of Memory & Language,49, 556–575.
McCloskey, M. (1992). Cognitive mechanisms in numerical processing: Evidence from acquired dyscalculia.Cognition,44, 107–157.
Meyer, A. S., Roelofs, A., &Levelt, W. J. M. (2003). Word length effects in object naming: The role of a response criterion.Journal of Memory & Language,48, 131–147.
Naccache, L., &Dehaene, S. (2001). Unconscious semantic priming extends to novel unseen stimuli.Cognition,80, 223–237.
Noel, M. P., &Seron, X. (1993). Arabic number reading deficit: A single case study.Cognitive Neuropsychology,10, 317–339.
Pecher, D. (2001). Perception is a two-way junction: Feedback semantics in word recognition.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,8, 545–551.
Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M., &Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains.Psychological Review,103, 56–115.
Potter, M. C., &Faulconer, B. A. (1975). Time to understand pictures and words.Nature,253, 437–438.
Rastle, K., Kinoshita, S., Lupker, S. J., &Coltheart, M. (2003). Cross-task strategic effects.Memory & Cognition,31, 867–876.
Seidenberg, M. S., &McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed developmental model of word recognition.Psychological Review,96, 523–568.
Seifert, L. S. (1997). Activating representations in permanent memory: Different benefits for pictures and words.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 1106–1121.
Smith, M. C., &Magee, L. E. (1980). Tracing the time course of picture-word processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,109, 373–392.
Strain, E., Patterson, K., &Seidenberg, M. S. (1995). Semantic effects in single-word naming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 1140–1154.
Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions.Journal of Experimental Psychology,18, 643–662.
Taylor, T. E., &Lupker, S. J. (2001). Sequential effects in naming: A time-criterion account.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 117–138.
Theios, J., &Amrhein, P. C. (1989). Theoretical analysis of the cognitive processing of lexical and pictorial stimuli: Reading, naming, and visual and conceptual comparisons.Psychological Review,96, 5–24.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Damian, M.F. Asymmetries in the processing of Arabic digits and number words. Memory & Cognition 32, 164–171 (2004). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195829
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195829