Abstract
Face recognition models suggest independent processing for functionally different types of information, such as identity, expression, sex, and facial speech. Interference between sex and expression information was tested using both a rating study and Garner’s selective attention paradigm using speeded sex and expression decisions. When participants were asked to assess the masculinity of male and female angry and surprised faces, they found surprised faces to be more feminine than angry ones (Experiment 1). However, in a speeded-classification situation in the laboratory in which the sex decision was either “easy” relative to the expression decision (Experiment 2) or of more equivalent difficulty (Experiment 3), it was possible for participants to attend selectively to either dimension without interference from the other. Qualified support is offered for independent processing routes.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ashby, F. G., &Townsend, J. T. (1986). Varieties of perceptual independence.Psychological Review,93, 154–179.
Biederman, I., &Checkosky, S. F. (1970). Processing redundant information.Journal of Experimental Psychology,83, 486–490.
Brown, E., &Perrett, D. I. (1993). What gives a face its gender?Perception,22, 829–840.
Bruce, V. (1986). Influences of familiarity on the processing of faces.Perception,15, 387–397.
Bruce, V., Burton, A. M., Hanna, E., Healey, P., Mason, O., Coombes, A., Fright, R., &Linney, A. (1993). Sex discrimination: How do we tell the difference between male and female faces?Perception,22, 131–152.
Bruce, V., Ellis, H. D., Gibling, F., &Young, A. W. (1987). Parallel processing of the sex and familiarity of faces.Canadian Journal of Psychology,41, 510–520.
Bruce, V., &Young, A. (1986). Understanding face recognition.British Journal of Psychology,77, 305–327.
Burton, A. M., Bruce, V., &Dench, N. (1993). What’s the difference between men and women? Evidence from facial measurement.Perception,22, 153–176.
Calder, A. J., Young, A. W., Rowland, D., Perrett, D. I., Hodges, J. R., &Etcoff, N. L. (1996). Facial emotion recognition after bilateral amygdala damage: Differentially severe impairment of fear.Cognitive Neuropsychology,13, 699–745.
Campbell, R., Benson, P. J., Wallace, S. B., Doesbergh, S., &Coleman, M. (1999). More about brows: How poses that change brow position affect perceptions of gender.Perception,28, 489–504.
Campbell, R., Landis, T., &Regard, M. (1986). Face recognition and lipreading: A neurological dissociation.Brain,109, 509–521.
Campbell, R., Wallace, S., &Benson, P. J. (1996). Real men don’t look down: Direction of gaze affects sex decisions on faces.Visual Cognition,3, 393–412.
Cole, M., &Perez-Cruet, J. (1964). Prosopagnosia.Neuropsychologia,2, 237–246.
Ellis, A. W., Young, A. W., &Flude, B. M. (1990). Repetition priming and face processing: Priming occurs within the system that responds to the identity of a face.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,42A, 495–512.
Ellis, H. D. (1986). Processes underlying face recognition. In R. Bruyer (Ed.),The neuropsychology of face perception and facial expression (pp. 1–27). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Etcoff, N. L. (1984). Selective attention to facial identity and facial emotion.Neuropsychologia,22, 281–295.
Felfoldy, G. L., &Garner, W. R. (1971). The effects on speeded classification of implicit and explicit instructions regarding redundant dimensions.Perception & Psychophysics,9, 289–292.
Garner, W. R. (1974).The processing of information and structure. Potomac, MD: Erlbaum.
Garner, W. R. (1976). Interaction of stimulus dimensions in concept and choice processes.Cognitive Psychology,8, 98–123.
Gosselin, P., Kirouac, G., &Doré, F. Y. (1997). Components and recognition of facial expression in the communication of emotion by actors. In P. Ekman & E. L. Rosenberg (Eds.),What the face reveals: Basic and applied studies of spontaneous expression using the facial action coding system (FACS) (pp. 243–267). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Green, K. P., Kuhl, P. K., Meltzoff, A. N., &Stevens, E. B. (1991). Integrating speech information across talkers, gender, and sensory modality: Female faces and male voices in the McGurk effect.Perception & Psychophysics,50, 524–536.
Humphreys, G. W., Donnelly, N., &Riddoch, M. J. (1993). Expression is computed separately from facial identity, and it is computed separately for moving and static faces: Neuropsychological evidence.Neuropsychologia,31, 173–181.
Le Gal, P. M. (1999).Cognitive aspects of emotional expression processing. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Stirling.
McGurk, H., &MacDonald, J. (1976). Hearing lips and seeing voices.Nature,264, 746–748.
Melara, R. D., &Marks, L. E. (1990). Perceptual primacy of dimensions: Support for a model of dimensional interaction.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 398–414.
Melara, R. D., &Mounts, J. R. W. (1993). Selective attention to Stroop dimensions: Effects of baseline discriminability, response mode, and practice.Memory & Cognition,21, 627–645.
O’Toole, A. J., Abdi, H., Deffenbacher, K. A., &Valentin, D. (1993). Low-dimensional representation of faces in higher dimensions of the face space.Journal of the Optical Society of America A,10, 405–410.
Parry, F. M., Young, A. W., Saul, J. S. M., &Moss, A. (1991). Dissociable face processing impairments after brain injury.Journal of Clinical & Experimental Neuropsychology,13, 545–558.
Rolls, E. T. (1992). Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying face processing within and beyond the temporal cortical visual areas.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Series B,335, 11–21.
Rosenberg, E. L. (1997). The study of spontaneous facial expressions. In P. Ekman & E. L. Rosenberg (Eds.),What the face reveals: Basic and applied studies of spontaneous expression using the facial action coding system (FACS) (pp. 3–17). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schweinberger, S. R., Burton, A. M., &Kelly, S. W. (1999). Asymmetric dependencies in perceiving identity and emotion: Experiments with morphed faces.Perception & Psychophysics,61, 1102–1115.
Schweinberger, S. R., &Soukup, G. R. (1998). Asymmetric relationships among perceptions of facial identity, emotion, and facial speech.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 1748–1765.
Sergent, J., Ohta, S., MacDonald, B., &Zuck, E. (1994). Segregated processing of facial identity and emotion in the human brain: A PET study.Visual Cognition,1, 349–369.
Tranel, D., Damasio, A. R., &Damasio, H. (1988). Intact recognition of facial expression, gender, and age in patients with impaired recognition of face identity.Neurology,38, 690–696.
Walker, S., Bruce, V., &O’Malley, C. (1995). Facial identity and facial speech processing: Familiar faces and voices in the McGurk effect.Perception & Psychophysics,57, 1124–1133.
Young, A. W. (1998).Face and mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Young, A. W., McWeeny, K. H., Hay, D. C., &Ellis, A. W. (1986). Matching familiar and unfamiliar faces on identity and expression.Psychological Research,48, 63–68.
Young, A. W., Newcombe, F., De Haan, E. H. F., Small, M., &Hay, D. C. (1993). Face perception after brain injury: Selective impairments affecting identity and expression.Brain,116, 941–959.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was conducted when the first author was a PhD student funded by the United Kingdom Medical Research Council.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Le Gal, P.M., Bruce, V. Evaluating the independence of sex and expression in judgments of faces. Perception & Psychophysics 64, 230–243 (2002). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195789
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195789