Abstract
Subjects named the colors in which high- and low-frequency words and pronounceable nonwords, otherwise matched, were displayed. Color naming was slower for all three item types than for visually equivalent strings of nonalphanumeric symbols but was no slower for words than for nonwords, nor for high-frequency words than for low-frequency words. Unpronounceable letter strings had intermediate color-naming latencies. However, frequency and lexical status had large effects on latency for reading the same words and pseudowords aloud. Interference is thus predicted not by the strength of association between a letter string and its pronunciation but by the presence of word-like constituents. We argue that the interference from an unprimed noncolor word is due to, and isolates, one of two components of the classic Stroop effect: competition from the whole task set of reading. The other component, response competition, occurs only when lexical access is sufficiently primed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allport, D.A., Styles, E.A., &Hsieh, S. (1994). Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.),Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 421–452). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Allport, [D.] A., &Wylie, G. (2000). Task-switching, stimulus-response bindings and negative priming. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.),Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII ( pp. 35–70). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Balota, D. A., &Chumbley, J. I. (1985). The locus of frequency effects in the pronunciation task: Lexical access and/or production.Journal of Memory & Language,24, 89–106.
Bauer, B., &Besner, D. (1997). Processing in the Stroop task: Mental set as a determinant of performance.Canadian Journal of Psychology,51, 61–68.
Besner, B., Stolz, J. A., &Boutilier, C. (1997). The Stroop effect and the myth of automaticity.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,4, 221–225.
Borowsky, R., &Besner, D. (1993). Visual word recognition: A multistage activation model.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 815–840.
Burnage, G. (1988).CELEX: A guide for users. Nijmegen, The Netherlands: Centre for Lexical Information.
Cohen, J. D., Dunbar, K., &McClelland, J. L. (1990). On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect.Psychological Review,97, 332–361.
Cohen, J. D., &Huston, T.A. (1994). Progress in the use of interactive models for understanding attention and performance. In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.),Attention and performance XV (pp. 453–476). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cohen, J. D., Usher, M., &McClelland, J. L. (1998). A PDP approach to set size effects within the Stroop task: Reply to Kanne, Balota, Spieler, and Faust (1998).Psychological Review,105, 188–194.
Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. T., &Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.),Attention and performance VI (pp. 535–555). London: Academic Press.
Conrad, C. (1974). Context effects in sentence comprehension: A study of the subjective lexicon.Memory & Cognition,2, 130–138.
Dalgleish, T. (1995). Performance on the emotional Stroop task in groups of anxious, expert and control subjects: A comparison of computer and card presentation formats.Cognition & Emotion,9, 341–362.
De Jong, R. (2000). An intention-activation account of residual switch costs. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.),Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 357–376). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Deutsch, J. A., &Deutsch, D. (1963). Attention: Some theoretical considerations.Psychological Review,70, 80–90.
Dulaney, C. L., &Rogers, W. A. (1994). Mechanisms underlying reduction in Stroop interference with practice for young and old adults.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 470–484.
Dyer, F. N. (1973). The Stroop phenomenon and its use in the study of perceptual, cognitive, and response processes.Memory & Cognition,1, 106–120.
Fox, L. A., Schor, R. E., &Steinman, R. J. (1971). Semantic gradients and interference in naming color, spatial direction, and numerosity.Journal of Experimental Psychology,91, 59–65.
Glaser, M. D., &Glaser, W. R. (1982). Time course analysis of the Stroop phenomenon.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,8, 875–894.
Goldinger, S.D., Azuma, T., Abramson, M., &Jain, P. (1997). Open wide and say “Blah!” Attention dynamics of delayed naming.Journal of Memory & Language,37, 190–216.
Gopher, D. (1996). Attention control: Explorations of the work of an executive controller.Cognitive Brain Research,5, 23–38.
Goschke, T. (2000). Intentional reconfiguration and involuntary persistence in task-set switching. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.),Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (pp. 331–355). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Grainger, J., &Jacobs, A. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model.Psychological Review,103, 518–565.
Jersild, A. T. (1927). Mental set and shift.Archives of Psychology,14 (No. 89), 81.
Jones, J. L. (1989). Multiple access of homonym meanings: An artifact of backward priming?Journal of Psycholinguistic Research,18, 417–432.
Jones Chesters, M. H., Monsell, S., &Cooper, P. J. (1998). The disorder-salient Stroop effect as a measure of psychopathology in eating disorders.International Journal of Eating Disorders,24, 65–82.
Kahneman, D., &Chajczyk, D. (1983). Tests of the automaticity of reading: Dilution of Stroop effects by color-irrelevant stimuli.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,9, 497–509.
Kanne, S.M., Balota, D. A., Spieler, D. H., &Faust, M. E. (1998). Explorations of Cohen, Dunbar, and McCelland’s connectionist model of Stroop performance.Psychological Review,105, 174–187.
Klein, G. S. (1964). Semantic power measured through the interference of words with color-naming.American Journal of Psychology,77, 576–588.
Kučera, H., &Francis, W. N. (1967).Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
LaBerge, D. (1983). The spatial extent of attention to letters and words.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,9, 371–379.
Lhermitte, F. (1983). “Utilization behaviour” and its relation to lesions of the frontal lobes.Brain,106, 237–255.
Lupker, S. J., Brown, P., &Colombo, L. (1997). Strategic control in a naming task: Changing routes or changing deadlines.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,3, 570–590.
MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review.Psychological Bulletin,109, 163–203.
MacLeod, C. M. (1996). How priming affect speeded implicit tests of remembering: Naming colors versus reading words.Consciousness & Cognition,5, 73–90.
MacLeod, C. M. (1998). Training on integrated versus separated Stroop tasks: The progress of interference and facilitation.Memory & Cognition,26, 201–211.
MacLeod, C. M., &Dunbar, K. (1988). Training and Stroop-like interference: Evidence for a continuum of automaticity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,14, 126–135.
McClelland, J. L., &Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive-activation model of context effects in letter perception. Part 1: An account of basic findings.Psychological Review,88, 375–405.
Meiran, N. (1996). Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 1423–1442.
Melara, R. D., &Mounts, J. R. W. (1993). Selective attention to Stroop dimensions: Effects of baseline discriminability, response mode, and practice.Memory & Cognition,21, 627–645.
Merrill, E. C., Sperber, R. D., &McCauley, C. (1981). Differences in semantic encoding as a function of reading and comprehension skill.Memory & Cognition,9, 618–624.
Meuter, R. F. I., &Allport, [D.] A. (1999). Billingual language-switching in naming: Asymmetrical costs of language selection.Journal of Memory & Language,40, 25–40.
Meyer, D. E., &Kieras, D. E. (1997). A computational theory of executive control processes and human multiple task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms.Psychological Review,104, 3–65.
Mogg, K., &Marden, B. (1990). Processing of emotional information in anxious participants.British Journal of Clinical Psychology,29, 227–229.
Monsell, S. (1990). Frequency effects in lexical tasks: Reply to Balota and Chumbley.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,119, 335–339.
Monsell, S. (1991). The nature and locus of word frequency effects in reading. In D. Besner & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.),Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 148–197). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Monsell, S., Doyle, M. C., &Haggard, P. N. (1989). Effects of frequency on visual word recognition tasks: Where are they?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,118, 43–71.
Monsell, S., Patterson, K. E., Graham, A., Hughes, C. H., &Milroy, R. (1992). Lexical and sublexical translation of spelling to sound: Strategic anticipation of lexical status.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 452–467.
Monsell, S., Yeung, N., &Azuma, R. (2000). Reconfiguration of task set: Is it easier to switch to the weaker task?Psychological Research,63, 250–264.
Norman, D. A. (1981). Categorization of action slips.Psychological Review,88, 1–15.
Norman, D.A., &Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behavior. In R. J. Davidson, G. E. Schwartz, & D. Shapiro (Eds.),Consciousness and self regulation (Vol. 4, pp. 1–18). New York: Plenum.
Oden, G. C., &Spira, J. L. (1983). Influence of context on the activation and selection of ambiguous word senses.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,35A, 51–64.
Paap, K. R., &Johansen, L. S. (1994). The case of the vanishing frequency effect: A retest of the verification model.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 1129–1157.
Pashler, H. E. (1998).The psychology of attention. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Perry, N., & Elliot, R. (1990). [Undergraduate research project, University of Cambridge]. Unpublished raw data.
Plaut, D.C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., &Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains.Psychological Review,103, 56–115.
Plourde, C. E., &Besner, D. (1997). On the locus of the word frequency effect in visual word recognition.Canadian Journal of Psychology,51, 181–194.
Posner, M. I., &Snyder, C.R. R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control. In R. L. Solso (Ed.),Information processing and cognition: The Loyola symposium (pp. 55–85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Price, C. J., Wise, R. J. S., &Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1996). Demonstrating the implicit processing of visually presented words and pseu-dowords.Cerebral Cortex,6, 62–70.
Rogers, R. D. (1993).The costs of switching between cognitive tasks: A performance analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge.
Rogers, R.D., &Monsell, S. (1995). The costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,124, 207–231.
Seidenberg, M. S., Waters, G. S., Barnes, M. A., &Tanenhaus, M. K. (1984). When does irregular spelling or pronunciation influence word recognition?Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,23, 383–404.
Shallice, T., Burgess, P.W., Schon, F., &Baxter, D.M. (1989). The origins of utilization behaviour.Brain,112, 1587–1598.
Spector, A., &Biederman, I. (1976). Mental set and mental shift revisited.American Journal of Psychology,89, 669–679.
Spoehr, K. T., &Smith, E. E. (1973). The role of syllables in perceptual processing.Cognitive Psychology,5, 71–89.
Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions.Journal of Experimental Psychology,18, 643–662.
Taft, M. (1979). Lexical access via an orthographic code: The basic orthographic syllable structure.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,18, 21–39.
Taft, M. (1987). Morphographic processing: The BOSS re-emerges. In M. Coltheart (Ed.),Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 265–279). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Treisman, A. (1960). Contextual cues in selective listening.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,12, 242–248.
Van Orden, G. C., &Goldinger, S. D. (1994). Interdependence of form and function in cognitive systems explains perception of printed words.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 1269–1291.
Whitney, P.W., McKay, T., Kellas, G., &Emerson, W. A. J. (1985). Semantic activation of noun concepts in context.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,11, 126–135.
Williams, J.M., Mathews, A., &MacLeod, C. (1996). The emotional Stroop task and psychopathology.Psychological Bulletin,120, 3–24.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Experiment 1 was conducted as a third-year undergraduate research project by T.J.T. and K.M. under the supervision of S.M. Experiments 2 and 3 were run by T.J.T. with the aid of a Grindley Grant from the University of Cambridge.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Monsell, S., Taylor, T.J. & Murphy, K. Naming the color of a word: Is it responses or task sets that compete?. Memory & Cognition 29, 137–151 (2001). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195748
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195748