Abstract
We conducted two experiments examining children’s and adults’ gaze behavior when processing faces analytically (focusing on a single feature) or holistically (comparing the overall similarity of the faces). Children 6–8 and 9–10 years of age and adults were instructed to assign schematically drawn faces in Experiment 1 and photos of real faces in Experiment 2 to two categories. The categories were constructed so as to allow either an analytical or holistic categorization of the faces. During all trials, gaze behavior was recorded from stimulus onset until reaction. The location and duration of the fixations used were analyzed. Whereas the holistic processors fixated the whole area of the eyes and nose most and longest independently of age, analytical processors showed a more feature-specific gaze behavior, focusing their fixations upon the particular feature used for subsequent processing. Thus, differences in analytical and holistic face processing can be detected early in gaze behavior—that is, at the visual encoding stage.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bruyer, R., &Coget, M. C. (1987). Features of laterally displayed faces: Saliency or top-down processing?Acta Psychologica,66, 103–114.
Carey, S. (1996). Perceptual categorization and expertise. In R. Gelman & T. Kit-Fong Au (Eds.),Perceptual and cognitive development (pp. 49–69). San Diego: Academic Press.
Collishaw, S. M., &Hole, G. J. (2000). Featural and configural processes in the recognition of faces of different familiarity.Perception,29, 893–909.
Cutting, J. (1990).The right cerebral hemisphere and psychiatric disorders. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Diamond, R., &Carey, S. (1986). Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,115, 107–117.
Farah, M. J., Tanaka, J. W., &Drain, H. M. (1995). What causes the face inversion effect?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,21, 628–634.
Farah, M. J., Wilson, K. D., Drain, [H.] M., &Tanaka, J. N. (1998). What is special about face perception?Psychological Review,105, 482–498.
Freire, A., Lee, K., &Symons, L. A. (2000). The face inversion effect as a deficit in the encoding of configural information: Direct evidence.Perception,29, 159–170.
Groner, R., Walder, F., &Groner, M. (1984). Looking at faces: Local and global aspects of scan paths. In A. G. Gale & F. Johnson (Eds.),Theoretical and applied aspects of gaze behavior research (pp. 523–533). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Haig, N. D. (1984). The effect of feature displacement on face recognition.Perception,13, 505–512.
Henderson, J. M., Falk, R., Minut, S., Dyer, F. C., &Mahadevan, S. (2001). Gaze control for face learning and recognition in humans and machines. In T. Shipley & P. Kellman (Eds.),From fragments to objects: Segmentation processes in vision (pp. 463–481). New York: Elsevier.
Janik, S. W., Wellens, A. R., Goldberg, M. L., &Dell’Osso, L. F. (1978). Eyes as the center of focus in the visual examination of human faces.Perceptual & Motor Skills,47, 857–858.
Jeffreys, D. A., Tukmachi, E. S. A., &Rockley, G. (1992). Evoked potential evidence for human brain mechanisms that respond to single, fixated faces.Experimental Brain Research,91, 351–362.
Kemler Nelson, D. G. (1989). The nature and occurrence of holistic processing. In B. E. Shepp & S. Ballesteros (Eds.),Object perception: Structure and process (pp. 357–386). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Leder, H., &Bruce, V. (2000). When inverted faces are recognized: The role of configural information in face recognition.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,53A, 513–536.
Macho, S., &Leder, H. (1998). Your eyes only? A test of interactive influence on the processing of facial features.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 1486–1500.
Manor, B. R., Gordon, E., Williams, L. M., Rennie, C. J., Bahramali, H., Latimer, C. R., Barry, R. J., &Meares, R. A. (1999). Gaze behavior reflects impaired face processing in patients with schizophrenia.Biological Psychiatry,46, 963–969.
Maurer, D., Le Grand, R., &Mondloch, C. J. (2002). The many faces of configural processing.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,6, 255–260.
Mertens, I., Siegmund, H., &Grüsser, O.-J. (1993). Gaze motor asymmetries in the perception of faces during a memory task.Neuropsychologia,31, 989–998.
Mogg, K., Millar, N., &Bradley, B. P. (2000). Biases in gaze behavior to threatening facial expressions in generalized anxiety disorder and depressive disorder.Journal of Abnormal Psychology,109, 695–704.
Moscovitch, M., Winocur, G., &Behrmann, M. (1997). What is special about face perception? Nineteen experiments on a person with visual object agnosia and dyslexia but normal face recognition.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,9, 555–604.
Schwaninger, A., Lobmaier, J., &Collishaw, S. M. (2002). Role of featural and configural information in familiar and unfamiliar face recognition.Lecture Notes in Computer Science,2525, 643–650.
Schwarzer G. (2000). Development of face processing: The effect of face inversion.Child Development,71, 391–401.
Schwarzer, G. (2002). Processing of facial and nonfacial visual stimuli in 2-5-year-old children.Infant & Child Development,11, 253–269.
Schwarzer, G., & Korell, M. (1999). Development of face processing: Differences between schematic and photorealistic faces.Poster presented at the biennial meetings of the Society for Research in Child Development. Albuquerque, NM.
Schwarzer, G., &Massaro, D. W. (2001). Modeling face identification processing in children and adults.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,79, 139–161.
Searcy, J. H., &Bartlett, J. C. (1996). Inversion and processing of component and spatial-relational information in faces.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,22, 904–915.
Shimizu, T., Shimizu, A., Yamashita, E., Iwase, M., Kajimoto, O., &Kawasaki, T. (2000). Comparison of eye-movement patterns in schizophrenic and normal adults during the examination of facial affect displays.Perceptual & Motor Skills,91, 1045–1056.
Stark, L., &Ellis, S. R. (1981). Scanpath revisited: Cognitive models of direct active looking. In D. F. Fisher, R. A. Monty, & J.W. Senders (Eds.),Gaze behavior: Cognition and visual perception (pp. 193–226). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Tanaka, J. W., &Farah, M. J. (1993). Parts and wholes in face recognition.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,46A, 225–245.
Tanaka, J. W., Kay, J. B., Grinnell, E., Stansfield, B., &Szechter, L. (1998). Face recognition in young children: When the whole is greater than the sum of its parts.Visual Cognition,5, 479–496.
Tanaka, J. W., &Sengco, J. A. (1997). Features and their configuration in face recognition.Memory & Cognition,25, 583–592.
van der Geest, J. N., Kemner, C., Verbaten, M. N., &van Engeland, H. (2002). Gaze behavior of children with pervasive developmental disorder toward human faces: A fixation time study.Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry & Allied Disciplines,43, 669–678.
Vetter, T., &Troje, N. (1997). Separation of texture and shape in images of faces for image encoding and synthesis.Journal of the Optical Society of America,14, 2152–2161.
Viviani, P. (1990). Gaze behavior in visual search. Cognitive, perceptual and motor control aspects. In E. Kowler (Ed.),Eye movements and their role in visual and cognitive processes (pp. 353–393). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Ward, T. B. (1989). Analytic and holistic modes of processing in category learning. In B. E. Shepp & S. Ballesteros (Eds.),Object perception: Structure and process. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Ward, T. B., &Scott, J. G. (1987). Analytical and holistic modes of learning family-resemblance concepts.Memory & Cognition,15, 42–54.
Wenger, M. J., &Ingvalson, E. M. (2002). A decisional component of holistic encoding.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,28, 872–892.
Yarbus, A. L. (1967).Gaze behavior and vision. New York: Plenum.
Yin, R. K. (1969). Looking at upside-down faces.Journal of Experimental Psychology.81, 141–145.
Young, A. W., Hellaway, D., &Hay, D. (1987). Configural information in face perception.Perception,16, 747–759.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schwarzer, G., Huber, S. & Dümmler, T. Gaze behavior in analytical and holistic face processing. Mem Cogn 33, 344–354 (2005). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195322
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195322