Abstract
The aim of the present study was to determine whether physical attributes of a memory representation would affect explicit memory performance and, if so, what type of factors would affect the size of a perceptual match effect. Subjects studied words in different, uncommon fonts and were later asked whether the word had been studied earlier. Words could be re-presented in the original font, a font studied with another word, or a font not seen earlier. In two additional experiments, we varied the numbers of words studied in the same unusual font (1 vs. 12 words per font). Recognition memory for the words was better if the test and study fonts matched, and this effect was larger for fonts not shared with other words. Moreover, old judgments were most likely to be classified as remember responses when words were re-presented in the same font when it had not been studied with other words. Although we found a significant effect of levels of processing, this factor did not interact with whether the font matched between study and test. These results are consistent with the predictions of the source of activation confusion model of memory and suggest that perceptual information operates according to the same memory principles as conceptual information.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, J. R. (1974). Retrieval of propositional information from long-term memory.Cognitive Psychology,6, 451–474.
Arndt, J., & Reder, L. M. (2001).The role of contextual competition on judgments of distinctiveness. Manuscript in preparation.
Blaxton, T. A. (1989). Investigating dissociations among memory measures: Support for a transfer-appropriate processing framework.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 657–668.
Cantor, J., &Engle, R. W. (1993). Working-memory capacity as longterm memory activation: An individual-differences approach.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 1101–1114.
Carr, T. H., Brown, J. S., &Charalambous, A. (1989). Repetition and reading: Perceptual encoding mechanisms are very abstract but not very interactive.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 763–778.
Cary, M., & Reder, L. M. (2000, November).Modeling the role of perceptual features in word recognition and fragment completion. Paper presented at the 41st Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, New Orleans.
Cave, C. B., Bost, P. R., &Cobb, R. E. (1996). Effects of color and pattern on implicit and explicit picture memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 639–653.
Clarke, R., &Morton, J. (1983). Cross modality facilitation in tachistoscopic word recognition.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,35A, 79–96.
Craik, F. I. M., &Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,11, 671–684.
Craik, F. I. M., Moscovitch, M., &McDowd, J. M. (1994). Contributions of surface and conceptual information to performance on implicit and explicit memory tasks.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 864–875.
Curran, T., Schacter, D. L., &Bessenoff, G. (1996). Visual specificity effects on memory: Beyond transfer appropriate processing?Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology,50, 22–33.
Donaldson, W. (1996). The role of decision processes in remembering and knowing.Memory & Cognition,24, 523–533.
Durgunoĝlu, A. Y., &Roediger, H. L., III (1987). Test differences in accessing bilingual memory.Journal of Memory & Language,26, 377–391.
Feustel, T. C., Shiffrin, R. M., &Salasoo, A. (1983). Episodic and lexical contributions to the repetition effect in word identification.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,112, 309–346.
Franks, J. J., Bilbrey, C. W., Lien, K. G., &McNamara, T. P. (2000). Transfer-appropriate processing (TAP) and repetition priming.Memory & Cognition,28, 1140–1151.
Gardiner, J. M. (1988). Functional aspects of recollective experience.Memory & Cognition,16, 309–313.
Gardiner, J. M., &Java, R. I. (1990). Recollective experience in word and nonword recognition.Memory & Cognition,18, 23–30.
Gardiner, J. M., &Parkin, A. J. (1990). Attention and recollective experience in recognition memory.Memory & Cognition,18, 579–583.
Graf, P., &Levy, B. A. (1984). Reading and remembering: Conceptual and perceptual processing involved in reading rotated passages.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,23, 405–424.
Graf, P., &Ryan, L. (1990). Transfer-appropriate processing for implicit and explicit memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 978–992.
Graf, P., Shimamura, A. P., &Squire, L. R. (1985). Priming across modalities and priming across category levels: Extending the domain of preserved function in amnesia.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,11, 386–396.
Hirshman, E., &Henzler, A. (1998). The role of decision processes in conscious recollection.Psychological Science,9, 61–65.
Hirshman, E., &Master, S. (1997). Modeling the conscious correlates of recognition memory: Reflections on the remember—know paradigm.Memory & Cognition,25, 345–351.
Hofstadter, D. (1985). Metafont, metamathematics, and metaphysics. In D. Hofstadter (Ed.),Metamagical themas: Questing for the essence of mind and pattern (pp. 260–296). New York: Basic Books.
Hofstadter, D., &McGraw, G. (1995). Letter spirit: Esthetic perception and creative play in the rich microcosm of the Roman alphabet. In D. Hofstadter & the Fluid Analogies Research Group,Fluid concepts and creative analogies (pp. 405–466). New York: Basic Books.
Inoue, C., &Bellezza, F. S. (1998). The detection model of recognition using know and remember judgments.Memory & Cognition,26, 299–308.
Jacoby, L. L. (1983). Remembering the data: Analyzing interactive processes in reading.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,22, 485–508.
Jacoby, L. L., &Dallas, M. (1981). On the relationship between auto biographical memory and perceptual learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,110, 306–340.
Jacoby, L. L., &Hayman, C. A. (1987). Specific visual transfer in word identification.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,13, 456–463.
Jacoby, L. L., &Witherspoon, D. (1982). Remembering without awareness.Canadian Journal of Psychology,36, 300–324.
Kimberg, D. Y. (1994).Executive functions, working memory, and frontal lobe function. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University.
Kirsner, K., Milech, D., &Standen, P. (1983). Common and modalityspecific processes in the mental lexicon.Memory & Cognition,11, 621–630.
Kolers, P. A. (1975). Specificity of operations in sentence recognition.Cognitive Psychology,7, 289–306.
Kolers, P. A. (1979). Reading and knowing.Canadian Journal of Psychology,33, 106–117.
Kolers, P. A., &Ostry, D. J. (1974). Time course of loss of information regarding pattern analyzing operations.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,13, 599–612.
Kučera, H., &Francis, W. N. (1967).Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
Lewis, C. H., &Anderson, J. R. (1976). Interference with real world knowledge.Cognitive Psychology,8, 311–335.
Light, L. L., LaVoie, D., Valencia-Laver, D., Owens, S. A., &Mead, G. (1992). Direct and indirect measures of memory for modality in young and older adults.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 1284–1297.
Mandler, G. (1980). Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence.Psychological Review,87, 252–271.
Murdock, B. B., &Walker, K. D. (1969). Modality effects in free recall.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,8, 665–676.
Peterson, M. J., & Reder, L. M. (2002).The role of spurious feature familiarity in recognition memory. Manuscript in preparation.
Peterson, S. B., &Potts, G. R. (1982). Global and specific components of information interpretation.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,21, 403–420.
Rajaram, S. (1993). Remembering and knowing: Two means of access to the personal past.Memory & Cognition,21, 89–102.
Rajaram, S., &Roediger, H. L., III (1993). Direct comparison of four implicit memory tests.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 765–776.
Reder, L. M., Angstadt, P., Cary, M., Ayers, M. A., &Erickson, M.A. (2002). A reexamination of stimulus-frequency effects in recognition: Two mirrors for low- and high-frequency pseudowords.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,28, 138–152.
Reder, L. M., Nhouyvanisvong, A., Schunn, C. D., Ayers, M. S., Angstadt, P., &Hiraki, K. (2000). A mechanistic account of the mirror effect for word frequency: A computational model of remember— know judgments in a continuous recognition paradigm.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 294–320.
Reder, L. M., &Ross, B. H. (1983). Integrated knowledge of different tasks: The role of retrieval strategy on fan effects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,9, 55–72.
Reder, L. M., &Schunn, C. D. (1996). Metacognition does not imply awareness: Strategy choice is governed by implicit learning and memory. In L.M. Reder (Ed.),Implicit memory and metacognition (pp. 45–77). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Reder, L. M., &Wible, C. (1984). Strategy use in question-answering: Memory strength and task constraints on fan effects.Memory & Cognition,12, 411–419.
Richardson-Klavehn, A., &Bjork, R. A. (1998). Measures of memory.Annual Review of Psychology,36, 475–543.
Roediger, H. L., III, &Blaxton, T. A. (1987a). Effects of varying modality, surface features, and retention interval on priming in wordfragment completion.Memory & Cognition,15, 379–388.
Roediger, H. L., III, &Blaxton, T. A. (1987b). Retrieval modes produce dissociations in memory for surface information. In D. S. Gorfein & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.),The Ebbinghaus Centennial Conference (pp. 349–379). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Roediger, H. L., III, &McDermott, K. B. (1993). Implicit memory in normal human subjects. In H. Spinnler & F. Boller (Eds.),Handbook of neuropsychology (pp. 64–131). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Roediger, H. L., III,Srinivas, K., &Weldon, M. S. (1989). Dissociations between implicit measures of retention. In S. S. Lewandowsky, J. C. Dunn, & K. Kirsner (Eds.),Implicit memory: Theoretical issues (pp. 67–84). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Schacter, D. L., &Graf, P. (1989). Modality specificity of implicit memory for new associations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 3–12.
Schacter, D. L., &Tulving, E. (1994). What are the memory systems of 1994? In D. L. Schacter & E. Tulving (Eds.),Memory systems (pp. 1–38). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Schunn, C. D., Reder, L. M., Nhouyvanisvong, A., Richards, D.R., &Stroffolino, P. J. (1997). To calculate or not to calculate: A source activation confusion model of problem familiarity’s role in strategy selection.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 3–29.
Tulving, E. (1985). Memory and consciousness.Canadian Psychologist,26, 1–12.
Tulving, E., &Schacter, D. L. (1990). Priming and human memory systems.Science,247, 301–306.
Weldon, M. S., &Roediger, H. L., III (1987). Altering retrieval demands reverses the picture superiority effect.Memory & Cognition,15, 269–280.
Zbrodoff, N. J. (1995). Why is 9+7 harder than 2+3? Strength and interference as explanations of the problem-size effect.Memory & Cognition,23, 689–700.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
These experiments were described in a talk at the 40th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, November 1999, and also as part of an address at the Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Society, June 1999. This research was supported by Grants 1-R01-MH52808 and 2-R01-MH52808 from the National Institute of Mental Health.
—Accepted by previous editorial team
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Reder, L.M., Donavos, D.K. & Erickson, M.A. Perceptual match effects in direct tests of memory: The role of contextual fan. Mem Cogn 30, 312–323 (2002). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195292
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195292