Abstract
The performance advantage for spatially compatible mappings of physical locations to keypress responses, relative to incompatible mappings, is eliminated when stimulus color, rather than location, is relevant on half of the trials. In Experiment 1, we compared the effects of mixing for different stimulus modes (physical locations, arrow directions, and location words) to determine whether this elimination of the stimulus—response compatibility (SRC) effect would generalize to other stimulus modes. The SRC effect was unaffected when the location information was conveyed by arrows and was amplified when the location information was conveyed by words. In Experiment 2, we used vocalleft—right responses instead of keypresses, and the SRC effects for all three stimulus modes were enhanced by mixing. In both experiments, for all stimulus modes, mixing reduced or reversed correspondence effects for trials on which the location information was irrelevant when the mapping for those trials on which it was relevant was incompatible. These findings suggest that when trial types are mixed, direct activation of the corresponding response, regardless of mapping, does not occur for physical locations mapped to keypresses. However, such activation does occur when stimuli or responses are verbal, apparently because performance is mediated in part by activation of a verbal name code for the stimulus.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barber, P., &O’Leary, M. (1997). The relevance of salience: Towards an activation account of irrelevant stimulus—response compatibility effects. In B. Hommel & W. Prinz (Eds.),Theoretical issues in stimulus— response compatibility (pp. 135–172). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
De Jong, R. (1995). Strategical determinants of compatibility effects with task uncertainty.Acta Psychologica,88, 187–207.
Duncan, J. (1978). Response selection in spatial choice reaction: Further evidence against associative models.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,30, 429–440.
Ehrenstein, A., &Proctor, R. W. (1998). Selecting mapping rules and responses in mixed compatibility four-choice tasks.Psychological Research,61, 231–248.
Eimer, M. (1995). S-R compatibility and automatic response activation: Evidence from psychophysiological studies.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,21, 837–854.
Greenwald, A. G. (1970). A choice reaction time test of ideomotor theory.Journal of Experimental Psychology,86, 20–26.
Hommel, B., &Prinz, W. (Eds.) (1997).Theoretical issues in stimulus— response compatibility. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Kornblum, S. (1994). The way irrelevant dimensions are processed depends on what they overlap with: The case of Stroop- and Simon-like stimuli.Psychological Research,56, 130–135.
Los, S. A. (1996). On the origin of mixing costs: Exploring information processing in pure and mixed blocks of trials.Acta Psychologica,94, 145–188.
Lu, C.-H., &Proctor, R. W. (1995). The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,2, 174–207
Lu, C.-H., &Proctor, R. W. (2001). Influence of irrelevant information on human performance.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,54A, 95–136.
MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review.Psychological Bulletin,109, 163–203.
Marble J. G., &Proctor, R. W. (2000). Mixing location-relevant and location-irrelevant choice-reaction tasks: Influences of location mapping on the Simon effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,26, 1515–1533.
Proctor, R. W., &Fisicaro, S. A. (1977). Time, capacity, and selection between perceptual attributes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,3, 337–348.
Proctor, R. W., Marble, J. G., &Vu, K.-P. L. (2000). Mixing incompatibly mapped location-relevant trials with location-irrelevant trials: Effects of stimulus mode on the reverse Simon effect.Psychological Research,64, 11–24.
Proctor, R. W., &Reeve, T. G. (Eds.) (1990).Stimulus—response compatibility: An integrated perspective. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Proctor, R. W., &Vu, K.-P. L. (2002). Eliminating, magnifying, and reversing spatial compatibility effects with mixed location-relevant and irrelevant trials. In W. Prinz & B. Hommel (Eds.),Common mechanisms in perception and action: Attention and performance XIX (pp. 443–473). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Proctor, R. W., Vu, K.-P. L., & Marble, J. G. (in press). Eliminating spatial compatibility effects for location-relevant trials by intermixing location-irrelevant trials.Visual Cognition.
Proctor, R. W., &Wang, H. (1997). Differentiating types of set-level compatibility. In B. Hommel & W. Prinz (Eds.),Theoretical issues in stimulus—response compatibility (pp. 11–37). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Shaffer, L. H. (1965). Choice reaction with variable S—R mapping.Journal of Experimental Psychology,70, 284–288.
Simon, J. R. (1990). The effects of an irrelevant directional cue on human information processing. In R.W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds.),Stimulus—response compatibility: An integrated prospective (pp. 31–86). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Stoffels, E. J. (1996a). On stage robustness and response selection routes: Further evidence.Acta Psychologica,91, 67–88.
Stoffels, E. J. (1996bA). Uncertainty and processing routes in the selection of a response: An S—R compatibility study.Acta Psychologica,94, 227–252.
Stroop, J. R. (1935/1992). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions.Journal of Experimental Psychology,18, 643–662. (Reprinted inJournal of Experimental Psychology: General,121, 15-23)
Tagliabue, M., Zorzi, M., Umiltà, C., &Bassignani, F. (2000). The role of LTM links and STM links in the Simon effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,26, 648–670.
Van Duren, L., &Sanders, A. F. (1988). On the robustness of the additive factors stage structure in blocked and mixed choice reaction designs.Acta Psychologica,69, 83–94.
Wang, H., &Proctor, R. W. (1996). Stimulus—response compatibility as a function of stimulus code and response modality.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,22, 1201–1217.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
—Accepted by previous editorial team
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Proctor, R.W., Vu, KP.L. Mixing location-irrelevant and location-relevant trials: Influence of stimulus mode on spatial compatibility effects. Mem Cogn 30, 281–293 (2002). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195289
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195289