Abstract
In two experiments, we examined the effects of task and location switching on the accuracy of reporting target characters in an attentional blink (AB) paradigm. Single-character streams were presented at a rate of 100 msec per character in Experiment 1, and successive pairs of characters on either side of fixation were presented in Experiment 2. On each trial, two targets appeared that were either white letters or black digits embedded in a stream of black letter distractors, and they were separated by between zero and five items in the stream (lags 1-6). Experiment 1 showed that report of the first target was least accurate if it immediately preceded the second target and if the two targets were either both letters or both digits (task repetition cost). Report of the second target was least accurate if one or two distractors intervened between the two targets (the U-shapedAB lag effect) and if one target was a letter and the other a digit (task switch cost). Experiment 2 added location uncertainty as a factor and showed similar effects as Experiment 1, with one exception. Lag 1 sparing (the preserved accuracy in reporting the second of two targets if the second immediately follows the first) was completely eliminated when the task required attention switching across locations. Two-way additive effects were found between task switching and location switching in the AB paradigm. These results suggests separate loci for their attentional effects. It is likely that the AB deficit is due mainly to central memory limitations, whereas location-switching costs occur at early visual levels. Task-switching costs occur at an intermediate visual level, since the present task switch involved encoding differences without changes in stimulus-response mapping rules (i.e., the task was character identification for both letters and digits).
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allport, A., &Hsieh, S. (2001). Task-switching: Using RSVP methods to study an experimenter-cued shift of set. In K. Shapiro (Ed.),The limits of attention (pp. 36–64). New York: Oxford University Press.
Arnell, K. M. (2001). Cross-modal interactions in dual-task paradigms. In K. Shapiro (Ed.),The limits of attention (pp. 141–177). New York: Oxford University Press.
Arrington, C. M., Altmann, E. M., &Carr, T. H. (2003). Tasks of a feather flock together: Similarity effects in task switching.Memory & Cognition,31, 781–789.
Arrington, C. M., &Logan, G. D. (2004). The cost of a voluntary task switch.Psychological Science,15, 610–615.
Botella, J., Barriopedro, M. I., &Suero, M. (2001). A model of the formation of illusory conjunctions in the time domain.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,27, 1452–1467.
Breitmeyer, B. (1984).Visual masking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Briand, K. A., &Klein, R. M. (1987). Is Posner’s “beam” the same as Treisman’s “glue”? On the relation between visual orienting and feature integration theory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,13, 228–241.
Broadbent, D. E., &Broadbent, M. H. P. (1987). From detection to identification: Response to multiple targets in rapid serial visual presentation.Perception & Psychophysics,42, 105–113.
Chun, M. M., &Potter, M. C. (1995). A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,21, 109–127.
Chun, M. M., &Potter, M. C. (2001). The attentional blink and task switching within and between modalities. In K. Shapiro (Ed.),The limits of attention (pp. 20–35). New York: Oxford University Press.
Enns, J. T., Visser, T. A. W., Kawahara, J.-I., &Di Lollo, V. (2001). Visual masking and task switching in the attentional blink. In K. Shapiro (Ed.),The limits of attention (pp. 65–81). New York: Oxford University Press.
Holmgren, J. (1968). Visual search with imperfect recognition.Perception & Psychophysics,4, 247–252.
Isaak, M. I., Shapiro, K. L., &Martin, J. (1999). The attentional blink reflects retrieval competition among multiple RSVP items: Tests of the interference model.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,25, 1774–1792.
Jolicoeur, P., Dell’Acqua, R., &Crebolder, J. M. (2001). The attentional blink bottleneck. In K. Shapiro (Ed.),The limits of attention (pp. 82–99). New York: Oxford University Press.
Juola, J. F., Duvuru, P., &Peterson, M. S. (2000). Priming effects in attentional gating.Memory & Cognition,28, 224–235.
Juola, J. F., Koshino, H., &Warner, C. B. (1995). Tradeoffs between attentional effects of spatial cues and abrupt onsets.Perception & Psychophysics,57, 333–342.
Kawahara, J.-I., Zuvic, S. M., Enns, J. T., &Di Lollo, V. (2003). Task switching mediates the attentional blink even without backward masking.Perception & Psychophysics,65, 339–351.
Kristjánsson, Á., &Nakayama, K. (2002). The attentional blink in space and time.Vision Research,42, 2039–2050.
Liu, G., Healey, C. G., &Enns, J. T. (2003). Target detection and localization in visual search: A dual systems perspective.Perception & Psychophysics,65, 678–694.
Meiran, N. (2000). Modeling cognitive control in task-switching.Psychological Research,63, 234–249.
Monsell, S., Sumner, P., &Waters, H. (2003). Task-set reconfiguration with predictable and unpredictable task switches.Memory & Cognition,31, 327–342.
Müller, H. J., &Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1989). Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: Time course of activation and resistance to interruption.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 315–330.
Nieuwenhuis, S., &Monsell, S. (2002). Residual costs in task switching: Testing the failure-to-engage hypothesis.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,9, 86–92.
Norman, D. A., &Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behavior. In R. J. Davidson, G. E. Schwartz, & D. Shapiro (Eds.),Consciousness and self-regulation (Vol. 4, pp. 1–18). New York: Plenum.
Peterson, M. S., &Juola, J. F. (2000). Evidence for distinct attentional bottlenecks in attention switching and attentional blink tasks.Journal of General Psychology,127, 6–26.
Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,32, 3–25.
Posner, M. I., &Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. Bouwhuis (Eds.),Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 531–556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Potter, M. C., Chun, M. M., Banks, B. S., &Muckenhoupt, M. (1998). Two attentional deficits in serial target search: The visual attentional blink and an amodal task-switch deficit.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 979–992.
Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., &Arnell, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 849–860.
Rogers, R. D., &Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,124, 207–231.
Ruthruff, E., &Pashler, H. E. (2001). Perceptual and central interference in dual-task performance. In K. Shapiro (Ed.),The limits of attention (pp. 100–123). New York: Oxford University Press.
Seiffert, A. E., &Di Lollo, V. (1997). Low-level masking in the attentional blink.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,23, 1061–1073.
Shapiro, K. L., &Raymond, J. E. (1994). Temporal allocation of visual attention: Inhibition or interference? in D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.),Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 151–188). San Diego: Academic Press.
Shih, S.-I (2000). Recall of two visual targets embedded in RSVP streams of distractors depends on their temporal and spatial relationship.Perception & Psychophysics,62, 1348–1355.
Sperling, G., &Weichselgartner, E. (1995). Episodic theory of the dynamics of spatial attention.Psychological Review,102, 503–532.
Turvey, M. T. (1973). On peripheral and central processes in vision: Inferences from an information-processing analysis of masking with patterned stimuli.Psychological Review,80, 1–52.
Visser, T. A., & Bischof, W. F. (2000, November).T1-difficulty and the attentional blink: We interrupt this processing to bring you an account. Paper presented at the 41st Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, New Orleans.
Visser, T. A., Bischof, W. F., &Di Lollo, V. (1999). Attentional switching in spatial and nonspatial domains: Evidence from the attentional blink.Psychological Bulletin,125, 458–469.
Weichselgartner, E., &Sperling, G. (1987). Dynamics of automatic and controlled visual attention.Science,238, 778–780.
Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided Search 2.0: A revised model of visual search.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,1, 202–238.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Juola, J.F., Botella, J. & Palacios, A. Task- and location-switching effects on visual attention. Perception & Psychophysics 66, 1303–1317 (2004). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195000
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195000