Abstract
A ladle was recalled as being taller by participants who observed tedious removal of sand from it with a small teaspoon than by those who observed removal with a larger spoon. A second experiment showed that the number of darts thrown in order to hit a target correlated negatively with memory estimates of the size of the target, a finding replicated in a third experiment with size estimates made while the target was visible. The first two experiments suggest that the way an object is used can influence memory of its size. The third experiment supports the hypothesis that in vivo size estimation of familiar objects may employ a mechanism that derives size from memory and that size memory can be distorted by the way an object was used.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Amorim, M. A., Loomis, J. M., &Fukusima, S. S. (1998). Reproduction of object shape is more accurate without the continued availability of visual information.Perception,27, 69–86.
Bhalla, M., &Proffitt, D. R. (1999). Visual-motor recalibration in geographical slant perception.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,25, 1–21.
Bertamini, M., Yang, T. L., &Proffitt, D. R. (1998). Relative size perception at a distance is best at eye level.Perception & Psychophysics,60, 673–682.
Bolles, R., &Bailey, D. (1956). Importance of object recognition in size constancy.Journal of Experimental Psychology,51, 222–225.
Brenner, E., van Damme, W. J., &Smeets, J. B. J. (1997). Holding an object one is looking at: Kinesthetic information on the object’s distance does not improve visual judgments of its size.Perception & Psychophysics,59, 1153–1159.
Bruner, J. S., &Goodman, C. C. (1947). Value and need as organizing factors in perception.Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology,42, 33–44.
Cavalier, R., &Wesp, R. (1997). The garbage can illusion as a teaching demonstration.Teaching of Psychology,24, 125–127.
Chapanis, A., &Mankin, D. A. (1967). The vertical-horizontal illusion in a visually-rich environment.Perception & Psychophysics,2, 249–255.
Cohen, R., Baldwin, L. M., &Sherman, R. C. (1978). Cognitive maps of naturalistic settings.Child Development,49, 1216–1218.
Fitzpatrick, V., Pasnak, R., &Tyer, Z. E. (1982). The effect of familiar size at familiar distances.Perception,11, 85–91.
Gibson, J. J. (1950).The perception of the visual world. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Gibson, J. J. (1979).The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Gogel, W. C. (1998). An analysis of perceptions from changes in optical size.Perception & Psychophysics,60, 805–820.
Goodale, M. A., Milner, A. D., Jakobson, L. S., &Carey, D. P. (1991). A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them.Nature,349, 154–156.
Greeno, J. G. (1994). Gibson’s affordances.Psychological Review,101, 336–342.
Gregory, R. (1963). Distortion of visual space as a function of inappropriate size scaling.Nature,199, 678–680.
Haber, R. N., &Levin, C. A. (2001). The independence of size perception and distance perception.Perception & Psychophysics,63, 1140–1152.
Hanyu, K., &Itsukushima, Y. (1995). Cognitive distance of stairways: Distance, traversal time, and mental walking time estimations.Environment & Behavior,27, 579–591.
Holway, A. H., &Boring, E. G. (1941). Determinants of apparent visual size with distance variant.American Journal of Psychology,54, 21–37.
Hubbard, T. L., Kall, D., &Baird, J. C. (1989). Imagery, memory, and size-distance invariance.Memory & Cognition,17, 87–94.
Huttenlocher, J., Hedges, L. V., &Vevea, J. L. (2000). Why do categories affect stimulus judgment?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,129, 220–241.
Ittelson, W. H. (1951). Size as a cue to distance: Static localization.American Journal of Psychology,64, 54–67.
Kassubek, J., Otte, M., Wolter, T., Greenlee, M. W.,Mergner, T., &Lucking, C. H. (1999). Brain imaging in a patient with hemimicropsia.Neuropsychologia,37, 1327–1334.
Kosslyn, S. M., Pick, H. L., Jr., &Fariello, G. R. (1974). Cognitive maps in children and men.Child Development,45, 707–716.
McBeath, M. K., Neuhoff, J. G., & Schiano, D. J. (1993, June).Familiar suspended objects appear smaller than actual independent of viewing distance. Poster presented at the 5th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Society, Chicago.
Neisser, U. (1994). Multiple systems: A new approach to cognitive theory.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,6, 225–241.
Nelson, T. E., Biernat, M. B., &Manis, M. (1990). Everyday base rates (sex stereotypes): Potent and resilient.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,59, 664–675.
Norman, J. (2002). Two visual systems and two theories of perception: An attempt to reconcile the constructivist and ecological approaches.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,25, 73–96.
Pastore, N. (1949). Need as a determinant of perception.Journal of Psychology,28, 457–475.
Proffitt, D. R., Bhalla, M., Gossweiler, R., &Midgett, J. (1995). Perceiving geographical slant.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,2, 409–428.
Proffitt, D. R., Stefanucci, J., Banton, T., &Epstein, W. (2003). The role of effort in perceiving distance.Psychological Science,14, 106–112.
Treisman, A. (1988). Features and objects: The fourteenth Bartlett memorial lecture.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,40A, 201–237.
Wesp, R., Cavalier, R., Clough, M., & Rancourt, J. (1996, April).Function as a determinant of perception of size. Poster presented at the meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Philadelphia.
Wesp, R., Peckyno, A., McCall, S., &Peters, S. (2000). Object recognition may distort size perception.Perceptual & Motor Skills,90, 803–809.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wesp, R., Cichello, P., Gracia, E.B. et al. Observing and engaging in purposeful actions with objects influences estimates of their size. Perception & Psychophysics 66, 1261–1267 (2004). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194996
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194996