Abstract
Responding to a target’s location takes longer when that location has recently contained a distractor event (ignored-repetition [IR] trial) relative to when it has been unoccupied (control trial). This is known as thelocation negative priming (NP)effect. We aimed to determine whether the elevated reaction time observed for IR trials was due to the reuse of a distractor location (location locus) and/or to the need to execute a (just inhibited) distractor response (response locus). We isolated these loci latency effects by using many-to-one and one-to-many location-response assignments. Our results showed that reusing a distractor location hastened target processing at that position (facilitative location locus), whereas the production of a distractor response was associated with a time cost (interfering response locus). Accordingly, part of the latency elevation seen with IR trials results from the need on these occasions to execute a just inhibited (distractor) response, and, hence, the location NP effect has a response locus.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baylis, G. C., Tipper.S. P., &Houghton, G. (1997). Externally cued and internally generated selection: Differences in distractor analysis and inhibition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,23, 1617–1630.
Buckolz, E., Boulougouris, A., &Khan, M. (2002). The influence of probe-trial selection requirements on the location negative priming effect.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology,56, 274–283.
Buckolz, E., Boulougouris, A., O’Donnell, C., &Pratt, J. (2002). Disengaging the negative priming mechanism in location tasks.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,14, 207–225.
Buckolz, E., Van Damme, J., &O’Donnell, C. (1998). Positive priming: Locations containing relevant information are labeled accordingly.Human Movement Science,17, 781–799.
Christie, J., &Klein, R. (2001). Negative priming for spatial location?Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology,55, 24–38.
Coles, M. G. H., Gratton, G., Bashore, T. R., Eriksen, C.W., &Donchin, E. (1985). A psychophysiological investigation of the continuous flow model of human information processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,11, 529–553.
De Jong, R., Liang, C.-C., &Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 731–750.
Deutsch, J. A., Deutsch, D., Lindsay, P. H., &Treisman, A. M. (1967). Comments on selective attention: Perception or response.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,19, 362–367.
Eimer, M. (1999). Facilitatory and inhibitory effects of masked prime stimuli on motor activation and behavioral performance.Acta Psychologica,101, 293–313.
Eimer, M., Schubo, A., &Schlaghecken, F. (2002). Locus of inhibition in the masked priming of response alternatives.Journal of Motor Behavior,34, 3–10.
Eriksen, C. W., Coles, M. G. H., Morris, L. R., &O’Hara, W. P. (1985). An electromyographic examination of response competition.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,23, 165–168.
Frame, K., Christie, J., & Klein, R. (1993, November).Negative priming for spatial location: A methodological critique. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Washington, DC.
Guy, S., & Buckolz, E. (2003, October).The locus of location repetition latency effects. Paper presented at the meeting of the Canadian Society for Psychology of Sport and Psychomotor Learning, Hamilton, ON.
Guy, S., Buckolz, E., &Pratt, J. (2004). The influence of distractoronly prime trials on the location negative priming mechanism.Experimental Psychology,54, 4–14.
Houghton, G., &Tipper, S. P. (1994). A model of inhibitory mechanisms in selective attention. In D. Dagenbach & T. Carr (Eds.),Inhibitory mechanisms in attention, memory, and language (pp. 53–112). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Klein, R. M., &Taylor, T. L. (1994). Categories of cognitive inhibition with reference to attention. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.),Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 113–150). San Diego: Academic Press.
Milliken, B., Joordens, S., Merikle, P., &Seiffert, A. (1998). Selective attention: A reevaluation of the implications of negative priming.Psychological Review,105, 203–229.
Milliken, B., Tipper, S. P., Houghton, G., &Lupiáñez, J. (2000). Attending, ignoring, and repetition: On the relation between negative priming and inhibition of return.Perception & Psychophysics,62, 1280–1296.
Moore, C. M. (1994). Negative priming depends on probe-trial conflict: Where has all the inhibition gone?Perception & Psychophysics,56, 133–147.
Neill, W. T. (1997). Episodic retrieval in negative priming and repetition priming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 1291–1305.
Neill, W. T., Terry, K. M., &Valdes, L. A. (1994). Negative priming without probe selection.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,1, 119–121.
Neill, W. T., Valdes, L. A., &Terry, K. M. (1995). Selective attention and the inhibitory control of cognition. In F. M. Dempster & C. J. Brainerd (Eds.),Interference and inhibition in cognition (pp. 207–261). New York: Academic Press.
Smid, H., Mulder, G., &Mulder, L. (1990). Selective response activation can begin before stimulus recognition is complete: A psychophysiological and error analysis of continuous flow.Acta Psychologica,74, 169–201.
Tipper, S. P. (1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,37A, 571–590.
Tipper, S. P. (2001). Does negative priming reflect inhibitory mechanisms? A review and integration of conflicting views.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,54A, 321–343.
Tipper, S. P., Brehaut, J. C., &Driver, J. (1990). Selection of moving and static objects for the control of spatially directed action.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 492–504.
Tipper, S. P., &Cranston, M. (1985). Selective attention and priming: Inhibitory and facilitatory effects of ignore primes.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,37A, 581–611.
Tipper, S. P., Meegan, D., &Howard, L. A. (2002). Action-centered negative priming: Evidence for reactive inhibition.Visual Cognition,9, 591–614.
Valle-Inclán, F., &Redondo, M. (1998). On the automaticity of ipsilateral response activation in the Simon effect.Psychophysiology,35, 366–371.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was supported by a grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada to E.B.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Buckolz, E., Goldfarb, A. & Khan, M. The use of a distractor-assigned response slows later responding in a location negative priming task. Perception & Psychophysics 66, 837–845 (2004). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194977
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194977