Abstract
Although it is natural to suppose that visual mental imagery is important in human deductive reasoning, the evidence is equivocal. This article argues that reasoning studies have not distinguished between ease of visualization and ease of constructing spatial models. Rating studies show that these factors can be separated. Their results yielded four sorts of relations: (1)visuospatial relations that are easy to envisage visually and spatially, (2)visual relations that are easy to envisage visually but hard to envisage spatially, (3)spatial relations that are hard to envisage visually but easy to envisage spatially, and (4)control relations that are hard to envisage both visually and spatially. Three experiments showed that visual relations slow down the process of reasoning in comparison with control relations, whereas visuospatial and spatial relations yield inferences comparable with those of control relations. We conclude that irrelevant visual detail can be a nuisance in reasoning and can impede the process.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berendt, B. (1996). Explaining preferred mental models in Allen inferences with a metrical model of imagery. In G. N. Cottrell (Ed.)Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 489–494). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Braine, M. D. S., &O’Brien, D. P. (Eds.) (1998).Mental logic. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Byrne, R. M. J., &Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1989). Spatial reasoning.Journal of Memory & Language,28, 564–575.
Clark, H. H. (1969). Linguistic processes in deductive reasoning.Psychological Review,76, 387–404.
Clement, C. A., &Falmagne, R. J. (1986). Logical reasoning, world knowledge, and mental imagery: Interconnections in cognitive processes.Memory & Cognition,14, 299–307.
DeSoto, L. B., London, M., &Handel, M. S. (1965). Social reasoning and spatial paralogic.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,2, 513–521.
D’Esposito, M., Aguirre, G. K., Zarahn, E., Ballard, D., Shin, R.K., &Lease, J. (1998). Functional MRI studies of spatial and nonspatial working memory.Cognitive Brain Research,7, 1–13.
Egan, D. E., &Grimes-Farrow, D. D. (1982). Differences in mental representations spontaneously adopted for reasoning.Memory & Cognition,10, 297–307.
Evans, J. S. B. T. (1980). Thinking: Experimental and information processing approaches. In G. Claxton (Ed.),Cognitive psychology: New directions (pp. 275–299). London: Routledge.
Finke, R. A. (1989).Principles of mental imagery. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Francis, W. N., &Kucčera, H. (1982).Frequency analysis of English usage: Lexicon and grammar. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Goel, V., &Dolan, R. J. (2001). Functional neuroanatomy of threeterm-relational reasoning.Neuropsychologia,39, 901–909.
Golding, W. (1955).The inheritors. New York: Harcourt Brace.
Huttenlocher, J. (1968). Constructing spatial images: A strategy in reasoning.Psychological Review,75, 550–560.
Johnson, M. K., &Raye, C. L. (1981). Reality monitoring.Psychological Review,88, 67–85.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983).Mental models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1998). Imagery, visualization, and thinking. In J. Hochberg (Ed.),Perception and cognition at century’s end (pp. 441–467). San Diego: Academic Press.
Johnson-Laird, P. N., &Byrne, R. M. J. (1991).Deduction. Hove, U.K.: Erlbaum.
Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Byrne, R. M. J. (in press). Conditionals: A theory of meaning, pragmatics, and inference.Psychological Review.
Johnson-Laird, P. N., Byrne, R. M. J, & Tabossi, P. (1989). Reasoning by model: The case of multiple quantifiers.Psychological Review,96, 658–673.
Klauer, K. C., Stegmaier, R., &Meiser, T. (1997). Working memory involvement in propositional and spatial reasoning.Thinking & Reasoning,3, 9–47.
Knauff, M. (1999). The cognitive adequacy of Allen’s interval calculus for qualitative spatial representation and reasoning.Spatial Cognition & Computation,1, 261–290.
Knauff, M., Jola, C., &Strube, G. (2001). Spatial reasoning: No need for visual information. In D. Montello (Ed.),Spatial information theory: Proceedings of COSIT’01 (pp. 447–457). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Knauff, M., Jola, C., Strube, G., Rauh, R., & Schlieder, C. (2002).Spatial representations can be the basis of reasoning. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Knauff, M., Kassubek, J., Mulack, T., &Greenlee, M. W. (2000). Cortical activation evoked by visual mental imagery as measured by functional MRI.NeuroReport,11, 3957–3962.
Knauff, M., Mulack, T., Kassubek, J., Salih, H. R., &Greenlee, M. W. (2002). Spatial imagery in deductive reasoning: A functional MRI.Cognitive Brain Research,13, 203–212.
Knauff, M., Rauh, R., Schlieder, C., &Strube, G. (1998). Mental models in spatial reasoning. In C. Freksa, C. Habel, & K. F. Wender (Eds.),Spatial cognition: An interdisciplinary approach to representing and processing spatial knowledge (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Bd. 1404, pp. 267–291). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Kosslyn, S. M. (1980).Image and mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kosslyn, S. M. (1994).Image and brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kosslyn, S. M., Alpert, N. M., Thompson, W. L., Maljkovic, V., Weise, S. B., Chabris, C. F., Hamilton, S. E., Rauch, S. L., &Buonanno, F. S. (1993). Visual mental imagery activates topographically organized visual cortex: PET investigations.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,5, 263–287.
Kosslyn, S. M., Pascual-Leone, A., Felician, O., Camposano, S., Keenan, J. P., Thompson, W. L., Ganis, G., Sukel, K. E., &Alpert, N. M. (1999). The role of area 17 in visual imagery: Convergent evidence from PET and rTMS.Science,2, 167–170.
Kosslyn, S. M., Thompson, W. L., &Alpert, N. M. (1997). Neural systems shared by visual imagery and visual perception: A positron emission tomography study.NeuroImage,6, 320–334.
Kroger, J., Cohen, J., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2002).A double dissociation between logic and mathematics: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Landau, B., &Jackendoff, R. (1993). “What” and “where” in spatial language and spatial cognition.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,16, 217–265.
Logie, R. H. (1995). Visuo-spatial working memory. Hove, U.K.: Erlbaum.
Newcombe, F., &Ratcliff, G. (1989). Disorders of visuospatial analysis. In F. Boller & J. Grafman (Eds.),Handbook of neuropsychology (pp. 333–356). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Newcombe, F., Ratcliff, G., &Damasio, H. (1987). Dissociable visual and spatial impairments following right posterior cerebral lesions: Clinical, neuropsychological and anatomical evidence.Neuropsychologia,18, 149–161.
Newstead, S. E., Pollard P., &Griggs, R. A. (1986). Response bias in relational reasoning.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,24, 95–98.
Osherson, D., Perani, D., Cappa, S., Schnur, T., Grassi, F., &Fazio, F. (1998). Distinct brain loci in deductive versus probabilistic reasoning.Neuropsychologia,36, 369–376.
Paivio, A. (1975). Perceptual comparisons through the mind’s eye.Memory & Cognition,3, 635–647.
Pearson, D. G., Logie, R. H., &Gilhooly, K. J. (1999). Verbal representations and spatial manipulation during mental synthesis.European Journal of Experimental Psychology,11, 295–314.
Potts, G. R., &Scholz, K. W. (1975). The internal representation of a three-term series problem.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,14, 439–452.
Prabhakaran, V., Smith, J. A., Desmond, J. E., Glover, G. H., &Gabrieli, J. D. (1997). Neural substrates of fluid reasoning: An fMRI study of neocortical activation during performance of the Raven’s Progressive Matrices Test.Cognitive Psychology,33, 43–63.
Richardson, J. T. E. (1987). The role of mental imagery in models of transitive inference.British Journal of Psychology,78, 189–203.
Rips, L. J. (1994).The psychology of proof. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Rueckl, J. G., Cave, K. R., &Kosslyn, S. M. (1989). Why are “what” and “where” processed by separate cortical visual systems? A computational investigation.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,1, 171–186.
Sabbah, P., Simond, G., Levrier, O., Habib, M., Trabaud, V., Murayama, N., Mazoyer, B. M., Briant, J. F., Raybaud, C., &Salamon, G. (1995). Functional magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 T during sensorimotor and cognitive tasks.European Journal of Neurology,35, 131–136.
Shaver, P., Pierson, L., &Lang, S. (1975). Converging evidence for the functional significance of imagery in problem solving.Cognition,3, 359–375.
Shepard, R. N., &Cooper, L. A. (1982).Mental images and their transformations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Siegel, S., &Castellan, N. J., Jr. (1988).Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Smith, E. E., Jonides, J., Koeppe, R. A., Awh, E., Schuhmacher, E.H., &Minoshima, S. (1995). Spatial versus object working memory: PET investigations.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,7, 337–356.
Sternberg, R. J. (1980). Representation and process in linear syllogistic reasoning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,109, 119–159.
Ungerleider, L. G. (1995). Functional brain imaging studies of cortical mechanisms for memory.Science,270, 769–775.
Ungerleider, L. G., &Mishkin, M. (1982). Two cortical visual systems. In D. J. Ingle, M. A. Goodale, & R. J. W. Mansfield (Eds.),Analysis of visual behaviour (pp. 549–586). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
—Accepted by previous editorial team
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Knauff, M., Johnson-Laird, P.N. Visual imagery can impede reasoning. Memory & Cognition 30, 363–371 (2002). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194937
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194937