Abstract
Eye movements were monitored while participants performed a change detection task with images of natural scenes. An initial and a modified scene image were displayed in alternation, separated by a blank interval (flicker paradigm). In the modified image, a single target object was changed either by deleting that object from the scene or by rotating that object 90° in depth. In Experiment 1, fixation position at detection was more likely to be in the target object region than in any other region of the scene. In Experiment 2, participants detected scene changes more accurately, with fewer false alarms, and more quickly when allowed to move their eyes in the scene than when required to maintain central fixation. These data suggest a major role for fixation position in the detection of changes to natural scenes across discrete views.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Crane, H. D., &Steele, C. M. (1985). Generation-V dual-Purkinjeimage eyetracker.Applied Optics,24, 527–537.
Currie, C. B., McConkie, G. W., Carlson-Radvansky, L. A., &Irwin, D. E. (2000). The role of the saccade target object in the perception of a visually stable world.Perception & Psychophysics,62, 673–683.
Eriksen, C. W., &St. James, J. D. (1986).Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model.Perception & Psychophysics,40, 225–240
Fernandez-Duque, D., &Thornton, I.M. (2000). Change detection without awareness: Do explicit reports underestimate the representation of change in the visual system?Visual Cognition,7, 324–344.
Grimes, J. (1996). On the failure to detect changes in scenes across saccades. In K. A. Akins (Ed.),Perception (Vancouver Studies in Cognitive Science, Vol. 5, pp. 89–110). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hayhoe, M. M., Bensinger, D. G., &Ballard, D. H. (1998). Task constraints in visual working memory.Vision Research,38, 125–137.
Henderson, J.M. (1991). Stimulus discrimination following covert attentional orienting to an exogenous cue.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,17, 91–106.
Henderson, J. M. (1996). Visual attention and the attention-action interface. In K. A. Akins (Ed.),Perception (Vancouver Studies in Cognitive Science, Vol. 5, pp. 290–316). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Henderson, J. M., &Hollingworth, A. (1999a). High-level scene perception.Annual Review of Psychology,50, 243–271.
Henderson, J.M., &Hollingworth, A. (1999b). The role of fixation position in detecting scene changes across saccades.Psychological Science,10, 438–443.
Henderson J. M., & Hollingworth, A. (in press). Eye movements, visual memory, and scene representation. In M. A. Peterson & G. Rhodes (Eds.),Analytic and holistic processes in the perception of faces, objects, and scenes. New York: JAI/Ablex.
Henderson, J. M., Hollingworth, A., & Subramanian, A. N. (1999).The retention and integration of scene information across saccades: A global change blindness effect. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Los Angeles.
Henderson, J. M., McClure, K. K., Pierce, S., &Schrock, G. (1997). Object identification without foveal vision: Evidence from an artificial scotoma paradigm.Perception & Psychophysics,59, 323–346.
Hollingworth, A., &Henderson, J. M. (2000). Semantic informativeness mediates the detection of changes in natural scenes.Visual Cognition,7, 213–235.
Hollingworth, A., Williams, C. C., & Henderson, J. M. (in press). To see and remember: Visually specific information is retained in memory from previously attended objects in natural scenes.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
Jonides, J. (1981). Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye's movement. In J. B. Long & A. D. Baddeley (Eds.),Attention and performance IX (pp. 187–203). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
McConkie, G.W., &Currie, C. B. (1996). Visual stability while viewing complex pictures.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,22, 563–581.
O'Regan, J. K., Deubel, H., Clark, J. J., &Rensink, R. A. (2000). Picture changes during blinks: Looking without seeing and seeing without looking.Visual Cognition,7, 191–212.
Posner, M. I., Snyder, C. R., &Davidson, B. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,109, 160–174.
Rensink, R. A. (2000a). The dynamic representation of scenes.Visual Cognition,7, 17–42.
Rensink, R.A. (2000b). Visual search for change: A probe into the nature of attentional processing.Visual Cognition,7, 345–376.
Rensink, R.A., O'Regan, J. K., &Clark, J. J. (1997). To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes.Psychological Science,8, 368–373.
Scholl, B. J. (2000). Attenuated change blindness for exogenously attended items in a flicker paradigm.Visual Cognition,7, 377–396.
Simons, D. J., &Levin, D. T. (1997). Change blindness.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,1, 261–267.
Theeuwes, J. (1991). Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity.Perception & Psychophysics,50, 184–193.
Williams, P., &Simons, D. J. (2000). Detecting changes in novel 3D objects: Effects of change magnitude, spatiotemporal continuity, and stimulus familiarity.Visual Cognition,7, 297–322.
Wolfe, J.M. (1999). Inattentional amnesia. In V. Coltheart (Ed.), Fleeting memories (pp. 71–94). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by an NSF Graduate Research Fellowship to A.H. and NSF Grants SBR 9617274 and ECS 9873531 to J.M.H. A brief report of this work was presented at the 39th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society in Dallas, November 1998.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hollingworth, A., Schrock, G. & Henderson, J.M. Change detection in the flicker paradigm: The role of fixation position within the scene. Memory & Cognition 29, 296–304 (2001). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194923
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194923