Abstract
The fluency of retrieval during a test of memory has been implicated as a cue for judgments of learning (JOLs), but little is known about how fluency affects JOLs. In three experiments, we investigated (1)whether the fluency of generation during study may be a cue for JOLs and (2) whether such fluency effects are mediated by an analytic or nonanalytic inference. To accomplish our goals, we used a learner-observer-judge method. While studying paired associates, learners generated some targets at study. For these items, their JOLs were negatively correlated with the time taken to generate targets. Observers watched learners generate targets and then predicted learners' memory performance. Judges also made JOLs but did not watch the learners generate targets. JOLs from all groups were negatively related to learners' latencies to generate targets, with the magnitude of the relationship equivalent for learners and observers and lower for judges. These and other findings are consistent with the conclusions that the fluency of generation at study is a cue for JOLs and that such fluency effects are partly mediated by an analytic inference about how fluency is related to memory.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Battig, W. F., & Montague, W. F. (1969). Category norms for verbal items in 56 categories: A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms.Journal of Experimental Psychology Monographs,80(3, Pt. 2).
Begg, I., Vinski, E., Frankovich, L., &Holgate, B. (1991). Generating makes words memorable, but so does effective reading.Memory & Cognition,19, 487–497.
Benjamin, A. S., &Bjork, R. A. (1996). Retrieval fluency as a metacognitive index. In L.M. Reder (Ed.),Implicit memory and metacognition (pp. 309–338). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Benjamin, A. S., Bjork, R. A., &Schwartz, B. L. (1998). The mismeasure of memory: When retrieval fluency is misleading as a metacognitive index.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,127, 55–68.
Brennan, S. E., &Williams, M. (1995). The feeling of another's knowing: Prosody and filled pauses as cues to listeners about the metacognitive states of speakers.Journal of Memory & Language,34, 383–398.
Carroll, M., Nelson, T. O., &Kirwan, A. (1997). Tradeoff of semantic relatedness and degree of overlearning: Differential effects on metamemory and on long-term retention.Acta Psychologica,95, 239–253.
Costermans, J., Lories, G., &Ansay, C. (1992). Confidence level and feeling of knowing in question answering: The weight of inferential processes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 142–150.
Dunlosky, J., &Nelson, T. O. (1994). Does the sensitivity of judgments of learning (JOLs) to the effects of various study activities depend on when the JOLs occur?Journal of Memory & Language,33, 545–565.
Jacoby, L. R., &Brooks, L. R. (1984). Nonanalytic cognition: Memory, perception, and concept learning. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 18, pp. 1–47). New York: Academic Press.
Jameson, A., Nelson, T. O., Leonesio, R. J., &Narens, L. (1993). The feeling of another person's knowing.Journal of Memory & Language,32, 320–335.
Kelley, C. M., &Jacoby, L. L. (1996a). Adult egocentrism: Subjective experience versus analytic bases for judgment.Journal of Memory & Language,35, 157–175.
Kelley, C. M., &Jacoby, L. L. (1996b). Memory attributions: Remembering, knowing, and feeling of knowing. In L.M. Reder (Ed.),Implicit memory and metacognition (pp. 287–307). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Koriat, A. (1997). Monitoring one's own knowledge during study: A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,126, 349–370.
Leonesio, R. J., &Nelson, T. O. (1990). Do different metamemory judgments tap the same underlying aspects of memory?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 464–470.
Mazzoni, G., &Nelson, T. O. (1995). Judgments of learning are affected by the kind of encoding in ways that cannot be attributed to the level of recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 1263–1274.
Nelson, T. O., & Dunlosky, J. (1996, November).Toward the theoretical mechanisms underlying immediate versus delayed judgments of learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Chicago.
Nelson, T. O., &Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 26, pp. 125–173). San Diego: Academic Press.
Paivio, A., Yuille, J. C., & Madigan, S. A. (1968). Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns.Journal of Experimental Psychology Monographs,76(1, Pt. 2).
Schwartz, B. L. (1994). Sources of information in metamemory: Judgments of learning and feelings of knowing.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,1, 357–375.
Schwartz, B. L., &Metcalfe, J. (1994). Methodological problems and pitfalls in the study of human metacognition. In J. Metcalfe & A. P. Shimamura (Eds.),Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 93–114). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Thiede, K. W., &Dunlosky, J. (1994). Delaying students' metacognitive monitoring improves their accuracy in predicting their recognition performance.Journal of Educational Psychology,86, 290–302.
Thiede, K. W., &Dunlosky, J. (1999). Toward a general model of selfregulated study: An analysis of selection of items for study and self paced study time.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,25, 1024–1037.
Thorndike, E. L., &Lorge, I. (1944).The teacher's word book of 30,000 words. New York: Columbia University, Teachers College, Bureau of Publications.
Vesonder, G. T., &Voss, J. F. (1985). On the ability to predict one's own responses while learning.Journal of Memory & Language,24, 363–376.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Matvey, G., Dunlosky, J. & Guttentag, R. Fluency of retrieval at study affects judgments of learning (JOLs): An analytic or nonanalytic basis for JOLs?. Memory & Cognition 29, 222–233 (2001). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194916
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194916