Abstract
Bimanual parity judgments about numerically small (large) digits are faster with the left (right) hand, even though parity is unrelated to numerical magnitude per se (the SNARC effect; Dehaene, Bossini, & Giraux, 1993). According to one model, this effect reflects a space-related representation of numerical magnitudes (mental number line) with a genuine left-to-right orientation. Alternatively, it may simply reflect an overlearned motor association between numbers and manual responses—as, for example, on typewriters or computer keyboards#x2014;in which case it should be weaker or absent with effectors whose horizontal response component is less systematically associated with individual numbers. Two experiments involving comparisons of saccadic and manual parity judgment tasks clearly support the first view; they also establish a vertical SNARC effect, suggesting that our magnitude representation resembles a number map, rather than a number line.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Algom, D., Dekel, A., &Pansky, A. (1996). The perception of number from the separability of the stimulus: The Stroop effect revisited.Memory & Cognition,24, 557–572.
Ashcraft, M. H. (1992). Cognitive arithmetic: A review of data and theory.Cognition,44, 75–106.
Bächtold, D., Baumüller, M., &Brugger, P. (1998). Stimulus-response compatibility in representational space.Neuropsychologia,36, 731–735.
Berch, D. B., Foley, E. J., Hill, R. J., &Ryan, P. M. (1999). Extracting parity and magnitude from Arabic numerals: Developmental changes in number processing and mental representation.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,74, 286–308.
Besner, D., &Coltheart, M. (1979). Ideographic and alphabetic processing in skilled reading of English.Neuropsychologia,17, 467–472.
Bishop, Y. M. M., Fienberg, S. E., &Holland, P.W. (1975).Discrete multivariate analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Butterworth, B. (1999).The mathematical brain. London: Macmillan.
Chochon, F., Cohen, L., van de Moortele, P. F., &Dehaene, S. (1999). Differential contributions of the left and right inferior parietal lobules to number processing.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,11, 617–630.
Colby, C. L., &Goldberg, M. E. (1999). Space and attention in parietal cortex.Annual Review of Neuroscience,22, 319–349.
Corballis, M. C. (1994). Can commissurotomized subjects compare digits between the visual fields?Neuropsychologia,32, 1475–1486.
Dehaene, S. (1996). The organization of brain activations in number comparison: Event-related potentials and the additive-factors method.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,8, 47–68.
Dehaene, S. (1997).The number sense: How the mind creates mathematics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Dehaene, S., &Akhavein, R. (1995). Attention, automaticity, and levels of representation in number processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 314–326.
Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., &Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and numerical magnitude.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,122, 371–396.
Dehaene, S., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., &Cohen, L. (1998). Abstract representations of numbers in the animal and the human brain.Trends in Neurosciences,21, 355–361.
Dehaene, S., Spelke, E., Pinel, P., Stanescu, R., &Tsivkin, S. (1999). Sources of mathematical thinking: Behavioral and brainimaging evidence.Science,284, 970–974.
Fias, W. (2001). Two routes for the processing of verbal numbers: Evidence from the SNARC effect.Psychological Research,65, 250–259.
Fias, W., Brysbaert, M., Geypens, F., &d’Ydewalle, G. (1996). The importance of magnitude information in numerical processing: Evidence from the SNARC effect.Mathematical Cognition,2, 95–110.
Fias, W., Lauwereyns, J., &Lammertyn, J. (2001). Irrelevant digits affect feature-based attention depending on the overlap of neural circuits.Cognitive Brain Research,12, 415–423.
Fischer, M. H. (2001). Number processing induces spatial performance biases.Neurology,57, 822–826.
Fischer, M. H., Castel, A. D., Dodd, M. D., &Pratt J. (2003). Perceiving numbers causes spatial shifts of attention.Nature Neuroscience,6, 555–556.
Gallistel, C. R. (2002). Language and spatial frames of reference in mind and brain.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,6, 321–322.
Gallistel, C. R., &Gelman, R. (1992). Preverbal and verbal counting and computation.Cognition,44, 43–74.
Girelli, L., Lucangeli, D., &Butterworth, B. (2000). The development of automaticity in accessing number magnitude.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,76, 104–122.
Glover, S. R., &Dixon, P. (2001). Dynamic illusion effects in a reaching task: Evidence for separate visual representations in the planning and control of reaching.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,27, 560–572.
Glover, S. [R.], &Dixon, P. (2002). Dynamic effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion in grasping: Support for a planning/control model of action.Perception & Psychophysics,64, 266–278.
Göbel, S., Walsh, V., &Rushworth, M. F. S. (2001). The mental number line and the human angular gyrus.NeuroImage,14, 1278–1289.
Lammertyn, J., Fias, W., &Lauwereyns, J. (2002). Semantic influences on feature-based attention due to overlap of neural circuits.Cortex,38, 878–882.
Latash, M. L. (1999). Mirror writing: Learning, transfer, and implications for internal inverse models.Journal of Motor Behavior,31, 107–111.
McCloskey, M. (1992). Cognitive mechanisms in numerical processing: Evidence from acquired dyscalculia.Cognition,44, 107–157.
Milner, A. D., &Goodale, M. A. (1995).The visual brain in action. London: Oxford University Press.
Otten, L. J., Sudevan, P., Logan, G. D., &Coles, M. G. H. (1996). Magnitude versus parity in numerical judgements: Event-related brain potentials implicate response conflict as the source of interference.Acta Psychologica,94, 21–40.
Pansky, A., &Algom, D. (1999). Stroop and Garner effects in comparative judgment of numerals: The role of attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,25, 39–58.
Pansky, A., &Algom, D. (2002). Comparative judgment of numerosity and numerical magnitude: Attention preempts automaticity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,28, 259–274.
Restle, F. (1970). Speed of adding and comparing numbers.Journal of Experimental Psychology,83, 274–278.
Rosenbaum, D. A. (1991).Human motor control. San Diego: Academic Press.
Rubin, N., Nakayama, K., &Shapley, R. (1996). Enhanced perception of illusory contours in the lower vs. upper visual hemifields.Science,271, 651–653.
Schmidt, R. A. (1988).Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis (2nd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Schwarz, W., &Heinze, H.-J. (1998). On the interaction of numerical and size comparison: A behavioral and event-related potential study.Neuropsychologia,36, 1167–1179.
Schwarz, W., &Ischebeck, A. (2000). Sequential effects in number comparison.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,26, 1606–1621.
Schwarz, W., &Ischebeck, A. (2003). On the relative speed account of number-size interference effects in comparative judgments of numerals.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,29, 507–522.
Schwarz, W., &Stein, F. (1998). On the temporal dynamics of digit comparison processes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 1275–1293.
Sudevan, P., &Taylor, D. A. (1987). The cuing and priming of cognitive operations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,13, 89–103.
Tlauka, M. (2002). The processing of numbers in choice-reaction tasks.Australian Journal of Psychology,54, 94–98.
Tzelgov, J., Meyer, J., &Henik, A. (1992). Automatic and intentional processing of numerical information.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 166–179.
Wascher, E., Schatz, U., Kuder, T., &Verleger, R. (2001). Validity and boundary conditions of automatic response activation in the Simon task.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,27, 731–751.
Zorzi, M., Priftis, K., &Umiltá, C. (2002). Brain damage: Neglect disrupts the mental number line.Nature,417, 138–139.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schwarz, W., Keus, I.M. Moving the eyes along the mental number line: Comparing SNARC effects with saccadic and manual responses. Perception & Psychophysics 66, 651–664 (2004). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194909
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194909