Abstract
I examined the relation between two inhibitory processes operating on spatial and temporal representations. In two experiments, participants had to detect a peripheral target that was presented after a variable interval following the onset of an uninformative peripheral cue. For the shortest cue-target interval, target detection was faster at the cued than at the uncued location, but this effect was reversed for the longer cue-target intervals. This finding has been taken to reflect a buildup of space-related inhibition over time, known asinhibition of return. Also, target detection was slower when the cue-target interval of the preceding trial was longer than that of the current trial than when this was not so. This sequential effect has been taken to reflect an intertrial carryover of time-related inhibition. Crucially, the spatial and temporal effects were additive in both experiments, suggesting a modular organization of the underlying inhibitory processes.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrams, R. A., &Dobkin, R. S. (1994). Inhibition of return: Effects of attentional cuing on eye movement latencies.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 467–477.
Alegria, J. (1978). Sequential effects of catch-trials on choice reaction time.Acta Psychologica,42, 1–6.
Arbuthnott, K. D. (1995). Inhibitory mechanisms in cognition.Current Psychology of Cognition,14, 3–45.
Band, G. P. H., &van Boxtel, G. J. M. (1999). Inhibitory motor control in stop paradigms: Review and reinterpretation of neural mechanisms.Acta Psychologica,101, 179–211.
Baumeister, A., &Joubert, C. (1969). Interactive effects on reaction time of preparatory interval length and preparatory interval frequency.Journal of Experimental Psychology,82, 393–395.
Beringer, J. (1992).Entwurf einer Anwendersprache zur Steuerung psychologischer Reaktionszeitexperimente [Design of an application language for conducting psychological reaction time experiments]. Frankfurt: Lang.
Bohlin, G., &Kjellberg, A. (1979). Orienting activity in two-stimulus paradigms as reflected in heart rate. In H. D. Kimmel, E. H. van Olst, & J. F. Orlebeke (Eds.),The orienting reflex in humans (pp. 169–197). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Brunia, C. H. M. (1993). Waiting in readiness: Gating in attention and motor preparation.Psychophysiology,30, 327–339.
Brunia, C. H. M., &Boelhouwer, A. J. W. (1988). Reflexes as a tool: A window on the central nervous system. In P. K. Ackles, J. R. Jennings, & M. G. H. Coles (Eds.),Advances in psychophysiology (Vol. 3, pp. 1–67). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
Coull, J. T., Frith, C. D., Büchel, C., &Nobre, A. C. (2000). Orienting attention in time: Behavioral and neuroanatomical distinction between exogenous and endogenous shifts.Neuropsychologia,38, 808–819.
Coull, J. T., &Nobre, A. C. (1998). Where and when to pay attention: The neural systems for directing attention to spatial locations and to time intervals as revealed by both PET and fMRI.Journal of Neuroscience,18, 7426–7435.
Danziger, S., &Kingstone, A. (1999). Unmasking the inhibition of return phenomenon.Perception & Psychophysics,61, 1024–1037.
Danziger, S., Kingstone, A., &Snyder, J. J. (1998). Inhibition of return to successively stimulated locations in a sequential visual search paradigm.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 1467–1475.
Dorris, M. C., Klein, R. M., Everling, S., &Munoz, D. P. (2002). Contribution of the primate superior colliculus to inhibition of return.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,14, 1256–1263.
Drazin, D. (1961). Effects of foreperiod, foreperiod variability and probability of stimulus occurrence on simple reaction time.Journal of Experimental Psychology,62, 43–50.
Fan, J., McCandliss, B. D., Sommer, T., Raz, A., &Posner, M. I. (2002). Testing the eff iciency and independence of attentional networks.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,14, 340–347.
Frick, R. W. (1995). Accepting the null hypothesis.Memory & Cognition,23, 132–138.
Gallistel, C. R., &Gibbon, J. (2000). Time, rate and conditioning.Psychological Review,107, 289–344.
Handy, T. C., Jha, A. P., &Mangun, G. R. (1999). Promoting novelty in vision: Inhibition of return modulates perceptual-level processing.Psychological Science,10, 157–161.
Ivanoff, J., &Klein, R. M. (2001). The presence of a nonresponding effector increases inhibition of return.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,8, 307–314.
Jennings, J. R., van der Molen, M. W., &Steinhauer, S. R. (1998). Preparing the eye, heart, and brain: Foreperiod length effects in a nonaging paradigm.Psychophysiology,35, 90–98.
Kingstone, A., &Pratt, J. (1999). Inhibition of return is composed of attentional and oculomotor processes.Perception & Psychophysics,61, 1046–1054.
Klein, R. M. (1988). Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search.Nature,334, 430–431.
Klein, R. M. (2000). Inhibition of return.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,4, 138–147.
Lepsien, J., &Pollmann, S. (2002). Covert reorienting and inhibition of return: An event-related fMRI study.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,14, 127–144.
Los, S. A. (1996). On the origin of mixing costs: Exploring information processing in pure and mixed blocks of trials.Acta Psychologica,94, 145–188.
Los, S. A. (2004).Bypassing the critical moment: Response inhibition accounts for sequential effects in nonspecific preparation. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Los, S. A., Knol, D. L., &Boers, R. M. (2001). The foreperiod effect revisited: Conditioning as a basis for nonspecific preparation.Acta Psychologica,106, 121–145.
Los, S. A., &van den Heuvel, C. E. (2001). Intentional and unintentional contributions to nonspecific preparation during reaction time foreperiods.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,27, 370–386.
Machado, A. (1997). Learning the temporal dynamics of behavior.Psychological Review,104, 241–265.
Maylor, E. A. (1985). Facilitatory and inhibitory components of orienting in visual space. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.),Attention and performance XI (pp. 189–204). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Maylor, E. A., &Hockey, R. (1985). Inhibitory component of externally controlled covert orienting in visual space.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,11, 777–787.
McClelland, J. L. (1979). On the time relations of mental processes: An examination of systems of processes in cascade.Psychological Review,86, 287–330.
McDonald, J. J., Ward, L. M., &Kiehl, K. A. (1999). An eventrelated brain potential study of inhibition of return.Perception & Psychophysics,61, 1411–1423.
Miller, J. (1993). A queue-series model for reaction time, with discretestage and continuous-flow models as special cases.Psychological Review,100, 702–715.
Miller, J., van der Ham, F., &Sanders, A. F. (1995). Overlapping stage models and reaction time additivity: Effects of activation equation.Acta Psychologica,90, 11–28.
Müller, H. J., &von Mühlenen, A. (2000). Probing distractor inhibition in visual search: Inhibition of return.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,26, 1591–1605.
Niemi, P., &Näätänen, R. (1981). Foreperiod and simple reaction time.Psychological Bulletin,89, 133–162.
Nobre, A. C. (2001). Orienting attention to instants in time.Neuropsychologia,39, 1317–1328.
Posner, M. I., &Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. Bouwhuis (Eds.),Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 531–556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Posner, M. I., & Fan, J. (in press). Attention as an organ system. In J. Pomerantz (Ed.),Neurobiology of perception and communication: From synapse to society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Posner, M. I., &Petersen, S. E. (1990). The attention systems of the human brain.Annual Review of Neuroscience,13, 25–42.
Posner, M. I., Rafal, R. D., Choate, L. S., &Vaughan, J. (1985). Inhibition of return: Neural basis and function.Cognitive Neuropsychology,2, 211–228.
Pratt, J., Hillis, J., &Gold, J. M. (2001). The effect of the physical characteristics of cues and targets on facilitation and inhibition.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,8, 489–495.
Pratt, J., Spalek, T. M., &Bradshaw, F. (1999). The time to detect targets at inhibited and noninhibited locations: Preliminary evidence for attentional momentum.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,25, 730–746.
Rafal, R. D., Calabresi, P. A., Brennan, C. W., &Sciolto, T. K. (1989). Saccade preparation inhibits reorienting to recently attended locations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 673–685.
Requin, J., Brener, J., &Ring, C. (1991). Preparation for action. In J. R. Jennings & M. G. H. Coles (Eds.),Handbook of cognitive psychophysiology: Central and automatic nervous system approaches (pp. 357–448). New York: Wiley.
Roberts, S., &Sternberg, S. (1993). The meaning of additive reactiontime effects: Tests of three alternatives. In D. E. Meyer & S. Kornblum (Eds.),Attention and performance XIV: Synergies in experimental psychology, artificial intelligence, and cognitive neuroscience (pp. 611–653). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Robinson, D. L., Bowman, E. M., &Kertzman, C. (1995). Covert orienting of attention in macaques: II. Contributions of parietal cortex.Journal of Neurophysiology,74, 698–712.
Rudell, A., &Hu, B. (2001). Does a warning signal accelerate the processing of sensory information? Evidence from recognition potential responses to high and low frequency words.International Journal of Psychophysiology,41, 31–42.
Sanders, A. F. (1980). Some effects of instructed muscle tension on choice reaction time and movement time. In R. S. Nickerson (Ed.),Attention and performance VII (pp. 59–74). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Sanders, A. F. (1998).Elements of human performance: Reaction processes and attention in human skill. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Snyder, J. J., Schmidt, W. C., &Kingstone, A. (2001). Attentional momentum does not underlie the inhibition of return effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,27, 1420–1432.
Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders’ method.Acta Psychologica,30, 276–315.
Sternberg, S. (1998). Discovering mental processing stages: The method of additive factors. In D. Scarborough & S. Sternberg (Eds.),An invitation to cognitive science: Vol. 4. Methods, models, and conceptual issues (pp. 703–863). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Sternberg, S. (2001). Separate modifiability, mental modules, and the use of pure and composite measures to reveal them.Acta Psychologica,106, 147–246.
Stevens, J. (1992).Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Tassinari, G., Aglioti, S., Chelazzi, L., Peru, A., &Berlucchi, G. (1994). Do peripheral non-informative cues induce early facilitation of target detection?Vision Research,34, 179–189.
Taylor, T. L., &Klein, R. M. (1998). On the causes and effects of inhibition of return.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,5, 625–643.
Tipper, S. P., Weaver, B., Jerreat, L. M., &Burak, A. L. (1994). Objectbased and environment-based inhibition of return of visual attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 478–499.
Woodrow, H. (1914). The measurement of attention.Psychological Monographs,17(5, Whole No. 76), 1–158.
Wundt, W. (1887).Grundzüge der physiologischen Psychologie [Foundations of physiological psychology]. Leipzig: Engelmann.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Los, S.A. Inhibition of return and nonspecific preparation: Separable inhibitory control mechanisms in space and time. Perception & Psychophysics 66, 119–130 (2004). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194866
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194866