Abstract
A model of visual search (Greenwood & Parasuraman, 1999) postulating that visuospatial attention is composed of two processing components—shifting and scaling of a variable-gradient attentional focus—was tested in three experiments. Whereas young participants are able to dynamically constrict or expand the focus of visuospatial attention on the basis of prior information, in healthy aging individuals visuospatial attention becomes a poorly focused beam, unable to be constricted around one array element. In the present work, we sought to examine predictions of this view in healthy young and older participants. An attentional focus constricted in response to an element-sized precue had the strongest facilitatory effect on visual search. However, this was true only when the precue correctly indicated the location of a target fixed in size. When precues incorrectly indicated target location or when target size varied, the optimal spatial scale of attention for search was larger, encompassing a number of array elements. Healthy aging altered the deployment of attentional scaling: The benefit of valid precues on search initially (in participants 65-74 years of age) was increased but later (in those 75-85 years of age) was reduced. The results also provided evidence that cue size effects are attentional, not strategic. This evidence is consistent with the proposed model of attentional scaling in visual search.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Braun, J., &Sagi, D. (1991). Texture-based tasks are little affected by second tasks requiring peripheral or central attentive fixation.Perception,20, 483–500.
Cabeza, R. (2002). Hemispheric asymmetry reduction in older adults: the HAROLD model.Psychology & Aging,17, 85–100.
Caggiano, D., Greenwood, P. M., & Parasuraman, R. (2001, April).Aging alters the role of saccades in attentional scaling effects on visual search. Paper presented at the meeting of the Cognitive Aging Society, Atlanta.
Carter, J. E., Obler, L., Woodward, S., &Albert, M. L. (1983). The effect of increasing age on the latency for saccadic eye movements.Journals of Gerontology,38, 318–320.
Castiello, U., &Umiltà, C. (1990). Size of the attentional focus and efficiency of processing.Acta Psychologica,73, 195–209.
Cave, K. R., &Bichot, N. P. (1999). Visuospatial attention: Beyond a spotlight model.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,6, 204–223.
Cave, K. R., &Wolfe, J. M. (1990). Modeling the role of parallel processing in visual search.Cognitive Psychology,22, 225–271.
Corbetta, M. (1998). Frontoparietal cortical networks for directing attention and the eye to visual locations: Identical, independent, or overlapping neural systems?Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,95, 831–838.
Davidson, M. C., &Marrocco, R. T. (2000). Local infusion of scopolamine into intraparietal cortex slows covert orienting in rhesus monkeys.Journal of Neurophysiology,83, 1536–1549.
Desimone, R., &Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.Annual Review of Neuroscience,18, 192–222.
Diamond, M. R., Ross, J., &Morrone, M. C. (2000). Extraretinal control of saccadic suppression.Journal of Neuroscience,20, 3449–3455.
Duncan, J., &Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity.Psychological Review,96, 433–458.
Eriksen, C. W., &St. James, J. D. (1986). Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model.Perception & Psychophysics,40, 225–240.
Faust, M. E., &Balota, D. A. (1997). Inhibition of return and visuospatial attention in healthy older adults and individuals with dementia of the Alzheimer type.Neuropsychology,11, 13–29.
Fink, G. R., Halligan, P. W., Marshall, J. C., Frith, C. D., Frackowiak, R. S., &Dolan, R. J. (1996). Where in the brain does visual attention select the forest and the trees?Nature,382, 626–628.
Fink, G. R., Halligan, P. W., Marshall, J. C., Frith, C. D., Frackowiak, R. S., &Dolan, R. J. (1997). Neural mechanisms involved in the processing of global and local aspects of hierarchically organized visual stimuli.Brain,120(Pt. 10), 1779–1791.
Gilbert, C., Ito, M., Kapadia, M., &Westheimer, G. (2000). Interactions between attention, context and learning in primary visual cortex.Vision Research,40, 1217–1226.
Gilchrist, I. D., Heywood, C. A., &Findlay, J. M. (1999). Saccade selection in visual search: Evidence for spatial frequency specific betweenitem interactions.Vision Research,39, 1373–1383.
Gottlob, L. R., &Madden, D. J. (1999). Age differences in the strategic allocation of visual attention.Journals of Gerontology,54, 165–172.
Grady, C. L. (1998). Brain imaging and age-related changes in cognition.Experimental Gerontology,33, 661–673.
Greenwood, P. M. (2000). The frontal aging hypothesis evaluated.Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society,6, 705–726.
Greenwood, P. M., Alexander, G. E., & Parasuraman, R. (1999, Month).Progression in early Alzheimer disease increases costs but not benefits of cue validity in visuospatial attention. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Neuroscience, Miami, FL.
Greenwood, P. M., &Parasuraman, R. (1994). Attentional disengagement deficit in nondemented elderly over 75 years of age.Aging & Cognition,1, 188–202.
Greenwood, P. M., &Parasuraman, R. (1999). Scale of attentional focus in visual search.Perception & Psychophysics,61, 837–859.
Greenwood, P. M., Parasuraman, R., &Alexander, G. E. (1997). Controlling the focus of spatial attention during visual search: Effects of advanced aging and Alzheimer disease.Neuropsychology,11, 3–12.
Greenwood, P. M., Parasuraman, R., &Haxby, J. (1993). Changes in visuospatial attention over the adult lifespan.Neuropsychologia,31, 471–485.
Greenwood, P. M., Sunderland, T., Friz, J. L., &Parasuraman, R. (2000). Genetics and visual attention: Selective deficits in healthy adult carriers of the varepsilon 4 allele of the apolipoprotein E gene.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,97, 11661–11666.
Hartley, A. A., Kieley, J., &McKenzie, C. R. M. (1992). Allocation of visual attention in younger and older adults.Perception & Psychophysics,52, 175–185.
Hawkins, H. L., Hillyard, S. A., Luck, S. J., Mouloua, M., Downing, C. J., &Woodward, D. P. (1990). Visual attention modulates signal detectability.Journal of Experimental Psychology,16, 802–811.
Intriligator, J., &Cavanagh, P. (2001). The spatial resolution of visual attention.Cognitive Psychology,43, 171–216.
Ito, M., &Gilbert, C. D. (1999). Attention modulates contextual influences in the primary visual cortex of alert monkeys.Neuron,22, 593–604.
James, W. (1981).The principles of psychology (Vol. 1). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1890)
Jernigan, T. L., Archibald, S. L., Berhow, M. T., Sowell, E. R., Foster, D. S., &Hesselink, J. R. (1991). Cerebral structure on MRI: Pt. I. Localization of age-related changes.Biological Psychiatry,29, 55–67.
Kinchla, R. A., Chen, Z., &Evert, D. L. (1995). Precue effects in visual search: Data or resource limited?Perception & Psychophysics,57, 441–450.
LaBerge, D., &Brown, V. (1989). Theory of attentional operations in shape identification.Psychological Review,96, 101–124.
LaBerge, D., Brown, V., Carter, M., Bash, D., &Hartley, A. (1991). Reducing the effects of adjacent distractors by narrowing attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,17, 65–76.
LaBerge, D., Carlson, R. L., Williams, J. K., &Bunney, B. G. (1997). Shifting attention in visual space: Tests of moving-spotlight models versus an activity-distribution model.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,23, 1380–1392.
Luck, S. J., &Hillyard, S. A. (1994). Spatial filtering during visual search: Evidence from human electrophysiology.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 1000–1014
Luo, Y. J., Greenwood, P. M., &Parasuraman, R. (2001). Dynamics of the spatial scale of visual attention revealed by brain event-related potentials.Cognitive Brain Research,12, 371–381.
Madden, D. J., &Gottlob, L. R. (1997). Adult age differences in strategic and dynamic components of focusing visual attiention.Aging, Neuropsychology, & Cognition,4, 185–210.
Madden, D. J., Pierce, T. W., &Allen, P. A. (1992). Adult age differences in attentional allocation during memory search.Psychology & Aging,7, 594–601.
Martin, A. J., Friston, K. J., Colebatch, J. G., &Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1991). Decreases in regional cerebral blood flow with normal aging.Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism,11, 684–689.
Matin, E. (1974). Saccadic suppression: A review and an analysis.Psychological Bulletin,81, 899–917.
McElree, B., &Carrasco, M. (1999). The temporal dynamics of visual search: Evidence for parallel processing in feature and conjunction searches.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,25, 1517–1539.
Moran, J., &Desimone, R. (1985). Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex.Science,229, 782–784.
Motter, B. C. (1993). Focal attention produces spatially selective processing in visual cortical areas V1, V2, and V4 in the presence of competing stimuli.Journal of Neurophysiology,70, 909–919.
Motter, B. C. (1994). Neural correlates of feature selective memory and pop-out in extrastriate area V4.Journal of Neuroscience,14, 2190–2199.
Motter, B. C., &Belky, E. J. (1998). The zone of focal attention during active visual search.Vision Research,38, 1007–1022.
MŸller, H. J., &Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1989). Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: Time course of activation and resistance to interruption.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 315–330.
Nakayama, K., &Makeben, M. (1989). Sustained and transient components of focal visual attention.Vision Research,29, 1631–1647.
Nobre, A. C., Sebestyen, G. N., Gitelman, D. R., Mesulam, M. M., Frackowiak, R. S., &Frith, C. D. (1997). Functional localization of the system for visuospatial attention using positron emission tomography.Brain,120, 515–533.
Noesselt, T., Hillyard, S. A., Woldorff, M. G., Schoenfeld, A., Hagner, T., Jancke, L., Tempelmann, C., Hinrichs, H., &Heinze, H. J. (2002). Delayed striate cortical activation during spatial attention.Neuron,35, 575–587.
Plude, D. J., &Doussard-Roosevelt, J. A. (1989). Aging, selective attention and feature integration.Psychology & Aging,4, 98–105.
Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,32, 3–25.
Posner, M. I., Walker, J. A., Friderich, F. J., &Rafal, R. D. (1984). Effects of parietal injury on covert orienting of attention.Journal of Neuroscience,4, 1863–1874.
Previc, F. H. (1995, April).Oculomotor behavior during visual search in humans. Paper presented at the meeting of Society for Neuroscience, San Diego.
Prinzmetal, W., Presti, D. E., &Posner, M. I. (1986). Does attention affect visual feature integration?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,12, 361–369.
Rabbitt, P., Diggle, P., Smith, D., Holland, F., &McInnes, L. (2001). Identifying and separating the effects of practice and of cognitive ageing during a large longitudinal study of elderly community residents.Neuropsychologia,39, 532–543.
Reiman, E. M., Caselli, R. J., Yun, L. S., Chen, K., Bandy, D., Minoshima, S., Thibodeau, S. N., &Osborne, D. (1996). Preclinical evidence of Alzheimer’s disease in persons homozygous for the epsilon 4 allele for apolipoprotein E.New England Journal of Medicine,334, 752–758.
Scialfa, C. T., Esau, S. P., &Joffe, K. M. (1998). Age, target-distractor similarity, and visual search.Experimental Aging Research,24, 337–358.
Shaw, M. L. (1984). Division of attention among spatial locations: A fundamental difference between detection of letters and detection of luminance increments. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.),Attention and performance X (pp. 109–120). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Smith, C. D., Andersen, A. H., Kryscio, R. J., Schmitt, F. A., Kindy, M. S., Blonder, L. X., &Avison, M. J. (1999). Altered brain activation in cognitively intact individuals at high risk for Alzheimer’s disease.Neurology,53, 1391–1396.
Theeuwes, J., Kramer, A. F., &Atchley, P. (1999). Attentional effects on preattentive vision: Spatial precues affect the detection of simple features.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,25, 341–347.
Townsend, J. T., &Ashby, F. G. (1984).Stochastic modeling of elementary psychological processing. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Treisman, A. M. (1985). Preattentive processing in vision.Computer Vision, Graphics & Imaging Processing,31, 156–177.
Treisman, A. [M.] (1996). The binding problem.Current Opinion in Neurobiology,6, 171–178.
Treisman, A. [M.], &Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention.Cognitive Psychology,12, 97–136.
Treisman, A. [M.], &Gormican, S. (1988). Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries.Psychological Review,95, 15–48.
Treisman, A. [M.], &Sato, S. (1990). Conjunction search revisited.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,16, 459–478.
Yamaguchi, S., Yamagata, S., &Kobayashi, S. (2000). Cerebral asymmetry of the “top-down” allocation of attention to global and local features.Journal of Neuroscience,20, RC72.
Zelinsky, G. J., Rao, R. P. N., Hayhoe, M. M., &Ballard, D. H. (1997). Eye movements reveal the spatiotemporal dynamics of visual search.Psychological Sciences,8, 448–453.
Zelinsky, G. J., &Sheinberg, D. L. (1997). Eye movements during parallel-serial visual search.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,23, 244–262.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Greenwood, P.M., Parasuraman, R. The scaling of spatial attention in visual search and its modification in healthy aging. Perception & Psychophysics 66, 3–22 (2004). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194857
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194857